A Simple Prediction Model for Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Hospital-Based Administrative Database Study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16851
Kenta Watanabe, Tsuyotoshi Tsuji, Hisanori Matsuzawa, Yohei Saruta, Yosuke Shimodaira, Katsunori Iijima
{"title":"A Simple Prediction Model for Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Hospital-Based Administrative Database Study.","authors":"Kenta Watanabe, Tsuyotoshi Tsuji, Hisanori Matsuzawa, Yohei Saruta, Yosuke Shimodaira, Katsunori Iijima","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Few prediction scores for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), a potentially life-threatening nosocomial diarrhea, combine high accuracy with simplicity. A simple prediction score for routine clinical practice is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all inpatients aged ≥ 18 at a secondary care hospital in Japan. The derivation and validation cohorts consisted of patients from January 2016 to December 2020 and January 2021 to September 2022, respectively. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved using electronic medical records and an administrative database. The primary outcome was to derive and validate an accurate, simple prediction score for primary hospital-onset CDI. A derived prediction score by logistic regression analysis was calibrated and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDI developed in 102 of 25 517 and 25 of 6259 patients in the derived and validation cohorts (2.7 cases/10 000 patient-days). The derived model for predicting CDI, including antibiotic use, acid suppressant (proton pump inhibitors or vonoprazan) use, Charlson comorbidity index, and Barthel index, yielded c-statistics of 0.89 and 0.82 in the derivation and validation cohort. The model was well calibrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This simple prediction score enables early medical intervention and modification of treatment plans to reduce the risk of developing primary hospital-onset CDI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Few prediction scores for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), a potentially life-threatening nosocomial diarrhea, combine high accuracy with simplicity. A simple prediction score for routine clinical practice is needed.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all inpatients aged ≥ 18 at a secondary care hospital in Japan. The derivation and validation cohorts consisted of patients from January 2016 to December 2020 and January 2021 to September 2022, respectively. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved using electronic medical records and an administrative database. The primary outcome was to derive and validate an accurate, simple prediction score for primary hospital-onset CDI. A derived prediction score by logistic regression analysis was calibrated and validated.

Results: CDI developed in 102 of 25 517 and 25 of 6259 patients in the derived and validation cohorts (2.7 cases/10 000 patient-days). The derived model for predicting CDI, including antibiotic use, acid suppressant (proton pump inhibitors or vonoprazan) use, Charlson comorbidity index, and Barthel index, yielded c-statistics of 0.89 and 0.82 in the derivation and validation cohort. The model was well calibrated.

Conclusions: This simple prediction score enables early medical intervention and modification of treatment plans to reduce the risk of developing primary hospital-onset CDI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艰难梭菌感染的简单预测模型:基于医院管理数据库的研究。
背景与目的:难辨梭菌感染(CDI)是一种可能危及生命的医院性腹泻,其预测评分既准确又简单。常规临床实践需要一个简单的预测评分。方法:我们对日本一家二级护理医院所有年龄≥18岁的住院患者进行了回顾性队列研究。推导和验证队列分别由2016年1月至2020年12月和2021年1月至2022年9月的患者组成。使用电子病历和行政数据库检索人口统计和临床数据。主要结局是得出并验证一个准确、简单的原发性医院发病CDI预测评分。通过逻辑回归分析得出的预测评分进行校准和验证。结果:在衍生和验证队列中,25517例患者中有102例发生CDI, 6259例患者中有25例发生CDI(2.7例/ 10000患者-天)。预测CDI的衍生模型,包括抗生素使用、酸抑制剂(质子泵抑制剂或伏诺哌嗪)使用、Charlson共病指数和Barthel指数,在推导和验证队列中产生的c统计量分别为0.89和0.82。这个模型校正得很好。结论:这一简单的预测评分使得早期医疗干预和修改治疗计划能够降低发生原发性医院源性CDI的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Current Landscape of Adoptive Cell Therapy and Challenge to Develop "Off-The-Shelf" Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Expression of PCED1A in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer and Its Relationship with Immune Infiltration: Potential as a Diagnostic Marker. Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Asian Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endogenous Ethanol Production in the Human Alimentary Tract: A Literature Review. Impact of Positive Glucose, Lactose, and Fructose Hydrogen Breath Tests on Symptoms and Quality of Life in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1