Implementation of a Child Maltreatment Screening Tool in the Prehospital Setting.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2440905
Makenzie Ferguson, Shelley Brukman, Kim Zaky, Bryan A Lara, Chloe Knudsen-Robbins, Carolina Amaya, Shelby K Shelton, Theodore Heyming
{"title":"Implementation of a Child Maltreatment Screening Tool in the Prehospital Setting.","authors":"Makenzie Ferguson, Shelley Brukman, Kim Zaky, Bryan A Lara, Chloe Knudsen-Robbins, Carolina Amaya, Shelby K Shelton, Theodore Heyming","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2440905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians are in a unique position to screen for child maltreatment as they are often the first point of contact with the health care system and they may encounter children in their home environment. However, EMS training regarding the signs of child maltreatment is lacking. Although several child maltreatment screening tools have been developed for the primary care and emergency department (ED) settings, there appears to be no published literature describing or evaluating a prehospital screening aid. The objective of this study was to develop, implement, and examine the effectiveness and acceptability of a prehospital child maltreatment screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a mixed methods qualitative and quantitative study, with data collection spanning June 2021-June 2022. We developed a child maltreatment screening tool \"Shield\" for the prehospital setting by adapting Pittsburgh Child Abuse Screening Tool (P-CAST), a screening tool developed at the University of Pittsburgh for use in the ED. Shield was integrated into the EMS electronic patient care report (ePCR) for three participating fire agencies. Data, including demographics, ED evaluation, and outcomes, were collected for patients who underwent Shield evaluation. The EMS clinicians completed self-assessment surveys and participated in focus groups to provide feedback on their experience using Shield.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participating EMS agencies evaluated 1,054 eligible patients (children <15 years old) during the study period, June 2021-June 2022. Of these, Shield screenings were initiated on 948 patients and completed on 753. Among all patients for whom a Shield evaluation was started, 32 (3.4%) screened positive for findings and/or histories concerning for possible maltreatment. Of these, 20 patients were transported to the primary study institution; in the ED 10 patients underwent additional child maltreatment evaluation. Pre-implementation surveys suggested a majority (77.2%) of EMS clinicians desired a child abuse screening tool integrated into the ePCR and post-implementation focus group data demonstrated EMS clinicians found Shield to be well integrated into their ePCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shield screens were initiated on nearly 90% of pediatric patients evaluated by EMS during the study period, suggesting that this tool has the potential to help standardize child maltreatment screening in the prehospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2440905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians are in a unique position to screen for child maltreatment as they are often the first point of contact with the health care system and they may encounter children in their home environment. However, EMS training regarding the signs of child maltreatment is lacking. Although several child maltreatment screening tools have been developed for the primary care and emergency department (ED) settings, there appears to be no published literature describing or evaluating a prehospital screening aid. The objective of this study was to develop, implement, and examine the effectiveness and acceptability of a prehospital child maltreatment screening tool.

Methods: We completed a mixed methods qualitative and quantitative study, with data collection spanning June 2021-June 2022. We developed a child maltreatment screening tool "Shield" for the prehospital setting by adapting Pittsburgh Child Abuse Screening Tool (P-CAST), a screening tool developed at the University of Pittsburgh for use in the ED. Shield was integrated into the EMS electronic patient care report (ePCR) for three participating fire agencies. Data, including demographics, ED evaluation, and outcomes, were collected for patients who underwent Shield evaluation. The EMS clinicians completed self-assessment surveys and participated in focus groups to provide feedback on their experience using Shield.

Results: Participating EMS agencies evaluated 1,054 eligible patients (children <15 years old) during the study period, June 2021-June 2022. Of these, Shield screenings were initiated on 948 patients and completed on 753. Among all patients for whom a Shield evaluation was started, 32 (3.4%) screened positive for findings and/or histories concerning for possible maltreatment. Of these, 20 patients were transported to the primary study institution; in the ED 10 patients underwent additional child maltreatment evaluation. Pre-implementation surveys suggested a majority (77.2%) of EMS clinicians desired a child abuse screening tool integrated into the ePCR and post-implementation focus group data demonstrated EMS clinicians found Shield to be well integrated into their ePCR.

Conclusions: Shield screens were initiated on nearly 90% of pediatric patients evaluated by EMS during the study period, suggesting that this tool has the potential to help standardize child maltreatment screening in the prehospital setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
院前儿童虐待筛查工具的实施
目的:紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生在筛查儿童虐待方面处于独特的地位,因为他们通常是与卫生保健系统的第一个接触点,并且他们可能在家庭环境中遇到儿童。然而,缺乏关于虐待儿童迹象的紧急医疗服务培训。虽然已经为初级保健和急诊科(ED)开发了几种儿童虐待筛查工具,但似乎没有发表的文献描述或评估院前筛查辅助工具。本研究的目的是开发、实施和检查院前儿童虐待筛查工具的有效性和可接受性。方法:我们完成了一项混合方法的定性和定量研究,数据收集时间为2021年6月至2022年6月。我们通过改编匹兹堡大学开发的用于急诊科的匹兹堡儿童虐待筛查工具(P-CAST),开发了一种用于院前环境的儿童虐待筛查工具“Shield”。Shield被整合到EMS的电子患者护理报告(ePCR)中,供三个参与的消防机构使用。数据,包括人口统计,ED评估和结果,收集了接受Shield评估的患者。EMS临床医生完成了自我评估调查,并参加了焦点小组,就他们使用Shield的经验提供反馈。结果:参与的EMS机构评估了1054名符合条件的患者(儿童)。结论:在研究期间,EMS对近90%的儿科患者进行了屏蔽筛查,这表明该工具有可能有助于规范院前儿童虐待筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Creation of a novel national dataset through linkage of EMS transport destination and verified ED capability. Diversity Among EMS Fellows. Social Determinants of Health and Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review. Chest Compressions Synchronized to Native Cardiac Contractions are More Effective than Unsynchronized Compressions for Improving Coronary Perfusion Pressure in a Novel Pseudo-PEA Swine Model. Paramedic-administered fibrinolysis in older patients with prehospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1