Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scottish Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1177/00369330241307338
Iona Robertson, Jeeva Karuniya Sundarraj, Khurram Shahzad Khan
{"title":"Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study.","authors":"Iona Robertson, Jeeva Karuniya Sundarraj, Khurram Shahzad Khan","doi":"10.1177/00369330241307338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Routine group and save (G&S) is commonly performed before appendicectomy despite limited evidence. This study aims to evaluate the necessity of preoperative G&S by determining perioperative blood transfusion rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre retrospective observational study of adult patients who had emergency appendicectomy across four hospitals between August 2018 and November 2020. Data analysed included demographics, operative details, G&S, crossmatching and perioperative blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1105 patients were identified, 635 (57.4%) were male. Median age was 37 years (IQR 26-52). 1012 (91.6%) were ASA 1 or 2. Surgical approach: 890 (80.5%) laparoscopic, 79 (7.1%) converted to open, 119 (10.8%) open and 17 (1.5%) laparotomy. Severity of appendicitis: 804 (72.8%) inflamed, 56 (5.1%) gangrenous, 235 (21.3%) perforated and 10 (0.9%) normal. 921 (83.3%) patients had preoperative G&S. 42 (3.8%) patients also had crossmatch. No patients required blood transfusion in 30 days post appendicectomy. The cost of G&S is estimated to be £40,164 in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The need for perioperative blood transfusion is rare in patients undergoing appendicectomy. It has a significant cost impact and can cause unnecessary delays. Our study suggests that a routine G&S policy is not necessary, and we suggest a more 'selective' G&S policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"369330241307338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330241307338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Routine group and save (G&S) is commonly performed before appendicectomy despite limited evidence. This study aims to evaluate the necessity of preoperative G&S by determining perioperative blood transfusion rates.

Methods: A multicentre retrospective observational study of adult patients who had emergency appendicectomy across four hospitals between August 2018 and November 2020. Data analysed included demographics, operative details, G&S, crossmatching and perioperative blood transfusion.

Results: 1105 patients were identified, 635 (57.4%) were male. Median age was 37 years (IQR 26-52). 1012 (91.6%) were ASA 1 or 2. Surgical approach: 890 (80.5%) laparoscopic, 79 (7.1%) converted to open, 119 (10.8%) open and 17 (1.5%) laparotomy. Severity of appendicitis: 804 (72.8%) inflamed, 56 (5.1%) gangrenous, 235 (21.3%) perforated and 10 (0.9%) normal. 921 (83.3%) patients had preoperative G&S. 42 (3.8%) patients also had crossmatch. No patients required blood transfusion in 30 days post appendicectomy. The cost of G&S is estimated to be £40,164 in this cohort.

Conclusions: The need for perioperative blood transfusion is rare in patients undergoing appendicectomy. It has a significant cost impact and can cause unnecessary delays. Our study suggests that a routine G&S policy is not necessary, and we suggest a more 'selective' G&S policy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人急诊阑尾切除术不需要术前常规血型和保存:一项回顾性多中心研究。
背景和目的:尽管证据有限,常规分组和保存(G&S)通常在阑尾切除术前进行。本研究旨在通过测定围手术期输血率来评估术前G&S的必要性。方法:对2018年8月至2020年11月四家医院急诊阑尾切除术的成年患者进行多中心回顾性观察研究。分析的数据包括人口统计学、手术细节、G&S、交叉配型和围手术期输血。结果:共检出1105例患者,其中男性635例,占57.4%。中位年龄37岁(IQR 26-52)。ASA 1、2级1012例(91.6%)。手术入路:腹腔镜890例(80.5%),中转开腹79例(7.1%),中转开腹119例(10.8%),开腹17例(1.5%)。阑尾炎严重程度:炎症804例(72.8%),坏疽56例(5.1%),穿孔235例(21.3%),正常10例(0.9%)。921例(83.3%)患者术前出现G&S。42例(3.8%)患者存在交叉配型。阑尾切除术后30天内无患者需要输血。这批学生的G&S费用估计为40164英镑。结论:阑尾切除术患者围手术期输血的必要性较低。它会产生重大的成本影响,并可能导致不必要的延误。我们的研究表明,常规的G&S政策是没有必要的,我们建议一个更“选择性”的G&S政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Gender disparities in adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy: A comparative analysis. Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study. Efficacy and outcomes of a highland prehospital trauma response team. Pancreatic insulinomas: Our 15-year surgical experience. Influence of core stabilization exercise on physical function and muscle thickness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1