Graph theoretic visualization of patient and health worker messaging in the EHR.

IF 3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1422208
Muhammad Zia Ul Haq, Andrew Hornback, Arash Harzand, David Andrew Gutman, Bradley Gallaher, Evan D Schoenberg, Yuanda Zhu, May D Wang, Blake Anderson
{"title":"Graph theoretic visualization of patient and health worker messaging in the EHR.","authors":"Muhammad Zia Ul Haq, Andrew Hornback, Arash Harzand, David Andrew Gutman, Bradley Gallaher, Evan D Schoenberg, Yuanda Zhu, May D Wang, Blake Anderson","doi":"10.3389/frai.2024.1422208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The electronic health record (EHR) has greatly expanded healthcare communication between patients and health workers. However, the volume and complexity of EHR messages have increased health workers' cognitive load, impeding effective care delivery and contributing to burnout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand these potential detriments resulting from EHR communication, we analyzed EHR messages sent between patients and health workers at Emory Healthcare, a large academic healthcare system in Atlanta, Georgia. We quantified the burden of messages interacted with by each health worker type and visualized the communication patterns using graph theory. Our analysis included 76,694 conversations comprising 144,369 messages sent between 47,460 patients and 3,749 health workers across 85 healthcare specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, nurses/certified nursing assistants/medical assistants (nurses/CNA/MA) interacted with the most messages (350), followed by non-physician practitioners (NPP) (241), physicians (166), and support staff (155), with the average conversation involving 10.51 interactions before resolution. Network analysis of the communication flow revealed that each health worker was connected to approximately two other health workers (average degree = 2.10). In message sending, support staff led in closeness centrality (0.44), followed by nurses/CNA/MA (0.41), highlighting their key role in fast information spread. For message reception, nurses/CNA/MA (0.51) and support staff (0.41) also had the highest values, underscoring their vital role in the communication network on the receiving end as well.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our analysis demonstrates the feasibility of applying graph theory to understand communication dynamics between patients and health workers and highlights the burden of EHR-based messaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"1422208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1422208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The electronic health record (EHR) has greatly expanded healthcare communication between patients and health workers. However, the volume and complexity of EHR messages have increased health workers' cognitive load, impeding effective care delivery and contributing to burnout.

Methods: To understand these potential detriments resulting from EHR communication, we analyzed EHR messages sent between patients and health workers at Emory Healthcare, a large academic healthcare system in Atlanta, Georgia. We quantified the burden of messages interacted with by each health worker type and visualized the communication patterns using graph theory. Our analysis included 76,694 conversations comprising 144,369 messages sent between 47,460 patients and 3,749 health workers across 85 healthcare specialties.

Results: On average, nurses/certified nursing assistants/medical assistants (nurses/CNA/MA) interacted with the most messages (350), followed by non-physician practitioners (NPP) (241), physicians (166), and support staff (155), with the average conversation involving 10.51 interactions before resolution. Network analysis of the communication flow revealed that each health worker was connected to approximately two other health workers (average degree = 2.10). In message sending, support staff led in closeness centrality (0.44), followed by nurses/CNA/MA (0.41), highlighting their key role in fast information spread. For message reception, nurses/CNA/MA (0.51) and support staff (0.41) also had the highest values, underscoring their vital role in the communication network on the receiving end as well.

Discussion: Our analysis demonstrates the feasibility of applying graph theory to understand communication dynamics between patients and health workers and highlights the burden of EHR-based messaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of large language models under different training background in Chinese medical examination: a comparative study. Robust deep-learning based refrigerator food recognition. Revolutionizing smart grid security: a holistic cyber defence strategy. Graph theoretic visualization of patient and health worker messaging in the EHR. Editorial: Large language models in work and business.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1