Sasinuch Rutjanawech, Julio C Zuniga-Moya, Ige George, Patrick B Mazi, Matthew R Osborn, Samuel M Fallon, Andrej Spec, Adriana M Rauseo
{"title":"Presentation and Outcomes of Histoplasmosis in Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study.","authors":"Sasinuch Rutjanawech, Julio C Zuniga-Moya, Ige George, Patrick B Mazi, Matthew R Osborn, Samuel M Fallon, Andrej Spec, Adriana M Rauseo","doi":"10.1111/tid.14421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Histoplasmosis is an important infection among transplant recipients. Few studies have described its epidemiology and outcomes in the modern era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis using medical records from a single center in the United States. We included patients 18 years or older with histoplasmosis. We divided the cohort into transplant recipients and immunocompetent groups to assess the outcomes in both groups. We utilized Cox hazard models to assess 90-day all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 137 patients; with 28 (20%) transplant recipients. After the first year post-transplant, patients with lung transplant (30%) had a diagnosis of histoplasmosis. Transplant recipients exhibited a significantly higher incidence of disseminated histoplasmosis than immunocompetent patients (64% vs. 34%, p = 0.001), higher admission to ICU (39% vs. 16%; p = 0.01) and higher but not significant 90-day crude all-cause mortality (14% vs. 11%, p = 0.71). Patients with transplants had a higher, but not significant hazard of all-cause mortality at 90 days (hazard ratio: 1.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-3.9) when compared to immunocompetent patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transplant recipients were more commonly diagnosed with histoplasmosis after the first year post-transplantation, and although they exhibited a higher hazard for death at 90 days, this increase was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Histoplasmosis is an important infection among transplant recipients. Few studies have described its epidemiology and outcomes in the modern era.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using medical records from a single center in the United States. We included patients 18 years or older with histoplasmosis. We divided the cohort into transplant recipients and immunocompetent groups to assess the outcomes in both groups. We utilized Cox hazard models to assess 90-day all-cause mortality.
Results: The study included 137 patients; with 28 (20%) transplant recipients. After the first year post-transplant, patients with lung transplant (30%) had a diagnosis of histoplasmosis. Transplant recipients exhibited a significantly higher incidence of disseminated histoplasmosis than immunocompetent patients (64% vs. 34%, p = 0.001), higher admission to ICU (39% vs. 16%; p = 0.01) and higher but not significant 90-day crude all-cause mortality (14% vs. 11%, p = 0.71). Patients with transplants had a higher, but not significant hazard of all-cause mortality at 90 days (hazard ratio: 1.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.4-3.9) when compared to immunocompetent patients.
Conclusion: Transplant recipients were more commonly diagnosed with histoplasmosis after the first year post-transplantation, and although they exhibited a higher hazard for death at 90 days, this increase was not statistically significant.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.