Efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A multicenter French study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101145
Abouzar Chaudhry , Floriane Gallais , Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz , Sylvie Colin De Verdiere , Thomas Villeneuve , Delphine Horeau , Eva Chatron , Elodie Blanchard , Olivier Collange , Benjamin Renaud-Picard
{"title":"Efficacy of convalescent plasma for the treatment of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A multicenter French study","authors":"Abouzar Chaudhry ,&nbsp;Floriane Gallais ,&nbsp;Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz ,&nbsp;Sylvie Colin De Verdiere ,&nbsp;Thomas Villeneuve ,&nbsp;Delphine Horeau ,&nbsp;Eva Chatron ,&nbsp;Elodie Blanchard ,&nbsp;Olivier Collange ,&nbsp;Benjamin Renaud-Picard","doi":"10.1016/j.resmer.2024.101145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lung transplant (LT) recipients are at greater risk of complications from COVID-19. Treatment options are limited partly due to interactions with immunosuppressive agents. Convalescent plasma (CP) is a potential treatment option, but it has not been extensively studied in LT patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CP use in France for COVID-19 infected LT patients.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively recruited LT patients followed up in the 10 French LT centers, older than 18 years, infected with SARS-CoV-2 between the pandemic onset and July 1, 2023, and treated with high-titer CP.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We collected the data from 27 patients who received CP for a COVID-19 infection in six out of the 10 French LT centers. The average delay between symptom onset and CP administration was 19.5 days, and 51.8 % of patients received four units. In patients treated within the first 9 days of infection, the survival rate was 100 % at one and three months vs. 75 % (<em>p</em> = 0.28) for late administration patients. Average loss of forced expiratory volume in 1 second at three months was 10.5 % in the early group vs. 3.3 % in the late group (<em>p</em> = 0.58). The average length of hospital stay was 18 and 24 days respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.07). Early use of CP was also more frequent in 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In this study highlighting the French experience for the use of CP in LT patients, we observed a limited, heterogenous but well-tolerated use of this therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48479,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 101145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590041224000618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Lung transplant (LT) recipients are at greater risk of complications from COVID-19. Treatment options are limited partly due to interactions with immunosuppressive agents. Convalescent plasma (CP) is a potential treatment option, but it has not been extensively studied in LT patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CP use in France for COVID-19 infected LT patients.

Material and methods

We retrospectively recruited LT patients followed up in the 10 French LT centers, older than 18 years, infected with SARS-CoV-2 between the pandemic onset and July 1, 2023, and treated with high-titer CP.

Results

We collected the data from 27 patients who received CP for a COVID-19 infection in six out of the 10 French LT centers. The average delay between symptom onset and CP administration was 19.5 days, and 51.8 % of patients received four units. In patients treated within the first 9 days of infection, the survival rate was 100 % at one and three months vs. 75 % (p = 0.28) for late administration patients. Average loss of forced expiratory volume in 1 second at three months was 10.5 % in the early group vs. 3.3 % in the late group (p = 0.58). The average length of hospital stay was 18 and 24 days respectively (p = 0.07). Early use of CP was also more frequent in 2023.

Discussion

In this study highlighting the French experience for the use of CP in LT patients, we observed a limited, heterogenous but well-tolerated use of this therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复血浆治疗肺移植受者 COVID-19 的疗效:法国一项多中心研究。
肺移植(LT)受者患COVID-19并发症的风险更高。治疗选择有限,部分原因是与免疫抑制剂相互作用。恢复期血浆(CP)是一种潜在的治疗选择,但尚未对LT患者进行广泛研究。我们的目的是评估在法国使用CP治疗COVID-19感染的LT患者的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:我们回顾性招募了在法国10个LT中心随访的年龄大于18岁、在大流行发病至2023年7月1日期间感染SARS-CoV-2并接受高滴度CP治疗的LT患者。结果:我们收集了法国10个LT中心中6个中27例因COVID-19感染而接受CP治疗的患者的数据。从症状出现到给药的平均延迟时间为19.5天,51.8%的患者接受了4个单位的治疗。在感染的前9天内治疗的患者,1个月和3个月的生存率为100%,而晚期给药患者的生存率为75% (p = 0.28)。3个月时1秒用力呼气量的平均损失,早期组为10.5%,晚期组为3.3% (p = 0.58)。平均住院时间分别为18天和24天(p = 0.07)。2023年早期使用CP的频率也更高。讨论:在这项强调法国在LT患者中使用CP的经验的研究中,我们观察到这种治疗的使用是有限的,异质性的,但耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Medicine and Research
Respiratory Medicine and Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of second-line treatments in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer progressing on osimertinib without identified targetable resistance mechanism at progression. Interstitial lung disease mortality rates and disparities across U.S. states Hit-hard vs step-up therapies in COPD: the Goldilocks dilemma Vibrating mesh nebulization increases tidal volume relative to jet nebulization during NIV in COPD exacerbation Reporting of data on participant ethnicity and socioeconomic status in high impact respiratory journals: a targeted literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1