Comparative study between intrathecal fentanyl and dorsal penile nerve block for controlling postoperative pain after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.4081/aiua.2024.12951
Adel Elatreisy, Yasser Ahmed, Ahmed Elgarhy, Mohamed Hindawy, Tamer Abouelgreed, Ismail Ahmed, Abdalla Abdalla, Hany Ramadan, Mohamed Aboelsuod, Khaled Shrief, Ayman Mohamed, Wael Ibrahim, Saeed Abdelhameed, Mohammad Alghamdi, Mohammed Alzahrani, Hamada Youssof
{"title":"Comparative study between intrathecal fentanyl and dorsal penile nerve block for controlling postoperative pain after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.","authors":"Adel Elatreisy, Yasser Ahmed, Ahmed Elgarhy, Mohamed Hindawy, Tamer Abouelgreed, Ismail Ahmed, Abdalla Abdalla, Hany Ramadan, Mohamed Aboelsuod, Khaled Shrief, Ayman Mohamed, Wael Ibrahim, Saeed Abdelhameed, Mohammad Alghamdi, Mohammed Alzahrani, Hamada Youssof","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.12951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl and dorsal penile nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective single-center study included 80 patients amenable to IPP. Patients were divided equally into two groups. Group I included 40 patients who were managed with spinal anesthesia with intrathecal fentanyl before undergoing IPP. Group II comprised 40 patients who received spinal anesthesia with dorsal penile block before IPP. Study groups were compared regarding postoperative VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores, total narcotics consumption, patient satisfaction levels, and perioperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study groups were comparable regarding baseline patients' criteria. The operative time was comparable between the study groups, with group I and group II having respective median times of 64 minutes (interquartile range: 55-78) and 67 minutes (interquartile range: 56-81) (p = 0.65). Additionally, both groups demonstrated similar distributions in IPP implant cylinder and reservoir size (p = 0.9). Postoperative pain was higher in group I, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Eight patients in group I (20%) called the physician's office asking for pain medication, compared to two patients in group II (5%) (p = 0.04). 85% of patients in group II were highly satisfied compared to 50 % in group I (p = 0.003). We reported a 5% complication rate in group I compared to 2.5% in group II (p = 0.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study found that the dorsal penile nerve block offers superior postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction compared to intrathecal fentanyl for patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":"96 4","pages":"12951"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl and dorsal penile nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP).

Patients and methods: A prospective single-center study included 80 patients amenable to IPP. Patients were divided equally into two groups. Group I included 40 patients who were managed with spinal anesthesia with intrathecal fentanyl before undergoing IPP. Group II comprised 40 patients who received spinal anesthesia with dorsal penile block before IPP. Study groups were compared regarding postoperative VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores, total narcotics consumption, patient satisfaction levels, and perioperative complications.

Results: The study groups were comparable regarding baseline patients' criteria. The operative time was comparable between the study groups, with group I and group II having respective median times of 64 minutes (interquartile range: 55-78) and 67 minutes (interquartile range: 56-81) (p = 0.65). Additionally, both groups demonstrated similar distributions in IPP implant cylinder and reservoir size (p = 0.9). Postoperative pain was higher in group I, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Eight patients in group I (20%) called the physician's office asking for pain medication, compared to two patients in group II (5%) (p = 0.04). 85% of patients in group II were highly satisfied compared to 50 % in group I (p = 0.003). We reported a 5% complication rate in group I compared to 2.5% in group II (p = 0.6).

Conclusions: The present study found that the dorsal penile nerve block offers superior postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction compared to intrathecal fentanyl for patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis insertion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞘内芬太尼与阴茎背神经阻滞在控制阴茎充气假体植入术后疼痛方面的比较研究。
目的:比较芬太尼鞘内阻滞与阴茎背侧神经阻滞治疗充气阴茎假体(IPP)术后疼痛的疗效。患者和方法:一项前瞻性单中心研究纳入了80例适合IPP的患者。患者被平均分为两组。第一组包括40例患者,在行IPP前经鞘内芬太尼脊髓麻醉。第二组40例患者在IPP前接受脊髓麻醉并阴茎背侧阻滞。比较各研究组术后VAS(视觉模拟量表)评分、麻醉品总消耗量、患者满意度和围手术期并发症。结果:两个研究组在基线患者标准方面具有可比性。两组间的手术时间具有可比性,I组和II组的中位时间分别为64分钟(四分位数范围:55-78)和67分钟(四分位数范围:56-81)(p = 0.65)。此外,两组在IPP种植体圆柱体和储层尺寸上的分布相似(p = 0.9)。术后疼痛I组较高,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。第一组有8名患者(20%)打电话到医生办公室要求服用止痛药,而第二组只有2名患者(5%)(p = 0.04)。II组85%的患者高度满意,而I组50%的患者高度满意(p = 0.003)。我们报告I组并发症发生率为5%,而II组为2.5% (p = 0.6)。结论:本研究发现,与鞘内芬太尼相比,阴茎背侧神经阻滞对充气阴茎假体置入患者的术后疼痛控制和患者满意度更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Urogenital and extra genital mutilation in gender-affirming surgery: are we violating primum non nocere? Editorial Comment on "Lady Urologist and male patients with prostate cancer". Predictive role of lactylation-related gene signature in the prognosis and immunotherapy response in bladder cancer. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the simultaneous implant of a penile prosthesis: ten years follow up. A comprehensive systematic review of studies on the potential of A49T and V89L polymorphism in SRD5AR2 as high susceptibility gene association with benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1