The Effect of Using Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone Iodine Solution on the Healing Process Before a Cesarean Section.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2024.09.008
Özlem Doğu, Öznur Tiryaki, Emin Levent Aksoy, Mehmet Sühha Bostancı
{"title":"The Effect of Using Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone Iodine Solution on the Healing Process Before a Cesarean Section.","authors":"Özlem Doğu, Öznur Tiryaki, Emin Levent Aksoy, Mehmet Sühha Bostancı","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effect of povidone iodine (PI) and chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) shower groups on the healing process in cesarean section operations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were recruited from Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital in Turkey between February and May 2021. In total, 102 pregnant women were scheduled for elective cesareans. They were randomly divided into PI group (A), CG group (B), and CG shower group (C) operated by three gynecology and obstetrics physicians. During the data collection, a demographics form, an incision site evaluation form, a visual analog scale (VAS), and a postpartum comfort questionnaire (PPCQ) were used. Data from the in-house blinding study to avoid bias and follow-up of the women were done for 7-day duration following postnatal to assess postoperative comfort, pain, and wound complications.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The VAS, pain, erythema, warm, edema, discharge, and wound opening were statistically evaluated at the incision site with 3 measurements for each of the groups. There was a significant difference in the CG groups (2 and 3) (VAS P < .000, erythema P < .05, and edema P < .05). The mean PPCQ score was higher in the CG groups (2 and 3) and showed a significant difference compared with the PI group (P < .000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the antiseptic and nonirritating properties of CG, showering 6 hours before the operation contributed to the wound healing process according to the incision site evaluation form and to a corresponding increased PPCQ level of the mother in the postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.09.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effect of povidone iodine (PI) and chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) shower groups on the healing process in cesarean section operations.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Patients were recruited from Gynecology and Obstetrics Hospital in Turkey between February and May 2021. In total, 102 pregnant women were scheduled for elective cesareans. They were randomly divided into PI group (A), CG group (B), and CG shower group (C) operated by three gynecology and obstetrics physicians. During the data collection, a demographics form, an incision site evaluation form, a visual analog scale (VAS), and a postpartum comfort questionnaire (PPCQ) were used. Data from the in-house blinding study to avoid bias and follow-up of the women were done for 7-day duration following postnatal to assess postoperative comfort, pain, and wound complications.

Findings: The VAS, pain, erythema, warm, edema, discharge, and wound opening were statistically evaluated at the incision site with 3 measurements for each of the groups. There was a significant difference in the CG groups (2 and 3) (VAS P < .000, erythema P < .05, and edema P < .05). The mean PPCQ score was higher in the CG groups (2 and 3) and showed a significant difference compared with the PI group (P < .000).

Conclusions: Due to the antiseptic and nonirritating properties of CG, showering 6 hours before the operation contributed to the wound healing process according to the incision site evaluation form and to a corresponding increased PPCQ level of the mother in the postoperative period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄糖酸氯己定与聚维酮碘溶液对剖宫产术前愈合过程的影响。
目的:比较聚维酮碘(PI)和葡萄糖酸氯己定(CG)淋浴组对剖宫产手术愈合过程的影响。设计:随机对照试验。方法:患者于2021年2月至5月从土耳其妇产科医院招募。总共有102名孕妇被安排进行选择性剖腹产。随机分为PI组(A)、CG组(B)、CG淋浴组(C),由3名妇产科医师操作。在数据收集过程中,使用了人口统计表、切口部位评估表、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和产后舒适问卷(PPCQ)。数据来自内部盲法研究,以避免偏倚,并在产后随访7天,以评估术后舒适度、疼痛和伤口并发症。结果:对切口部位的VAS、疼痛、红斑、发热、水肿、分泌物、创面开放性进行统计评估,每组测量3项。结论:根据切口部位评价表,CG具有抗菌、无刺激性的特点,术前6 h淋浴有助于伤口愈合过程,术后母亲PPCQ水平相应升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Anxiety and Information Needs Among Patients in the Preoperative Holding Area. Implementation of an Evidence-based Protocol to Increase the Use of Goal-directed Hemodynamic Therapy. Implementation of Perioperative Anesthesia Considerations for Military Veterans Who Consume Cannabis: A Quality Improvement Project. Effect of Magnetic Ball Pressing Combined With TEAS on Postoperative Nausea, Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Postoperative Thirst in Surgical Patients: A Bibliometric Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1