COVID-19 Pandemic in a Brazilian Afro-Derived Community (Quilombo).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1002/hpm.3888
Joenilton Oliveira Bonfim, Carlos Darwin Gomes da Silveira, Barbara Vidigal Braga, Tacio Nobrega Borges, Fábio Ferreira Amorim, Ana Maria Costa
{"title":"COVID-19 Pandemic in a Brazilian Afro-Derived Community (Quilombo).","authors":"Joenilton Oliveira Bonfim, Carlos Darwin Gomes da Silveira, Barbara Vidigal Braga, Tacio Nobrega Borges, Fábio Ferreira Amorim, Ana Maria Costa","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of comprehending social vulnerability as a pivotal element in public health. This study investigated the perceptions and practices of a Brazilian Afro-derived community (quilombo), descendants of enslaved Africans, regarding COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in July 2021 by administering a survey to an adult representative from each household in a Brazilian quilombola community.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 188 interviewed individuals, 45.2% reported that they did not feel adequately informed by healthcare professionals. The study found high adherence to preventive measures (wearing masks, using alcohol-based gel sanitiser, leaving home only when necessary and COVID-19 vaccination). Only 6.9% reported a household member contracting COVID-19, with only one case requiring hospitalisation and no deaths. Higher education was associated with an increased diagnosis of COVID-19 in their household (OR: 37.058, 95% CI: 4.053-338.837, p = 0.001), while feeling well or very well informed by television/radio was associated with a reduced diagnosis (OR: 0.223, 95% CI: 0.057-0.878, p = 0.032). Being married was associated with increased adherence to all prevention measures (OR: 4.598, 95% CI: 1.481-14.27, p = 0.008), whereas internet use as a source of information was independently associated with a reduced chance of adherence (OR: 0.240; 95% CI: 0.080-0.722, p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite many individuals reporting a lack of information from healthcare professionals about the pandemic, substantial adherence to protective measures was observed. Our findings highlight the critical importance of preventive measures during the pandemic, especially for vulnerable populations with limited access to healthcare services, and underscore the need for effective communication strategies to combat misinformation, particularly on social media platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3888","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of comprehending social vulnerability as a pivotal element in public health. This study investigated the perceptions and practices of a Brazilian Afro-derived community (quilombo), descendants of enslaved Africans, regarding COVID-19.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in July 2021 by administering a survey to an adult representative from each household in a Brazilian quilombola community.

Results: Among the 188 interviewed individuals, 45.2% reported that they did not feel adequately informed by healthcare professionals. The study found high adherence to preventive measures (wearing masks, using alcohol-based gel sanitiser, leaving home only when necessary and COVID-19 vaccination). Only 6.9% reported a household member contracting COVID-19, with only one case requiring hospitalisation and no deaths. Higher education was associated with an increased diagnosis of COVID-19 in their household (OR: 37.058, 95% CI: 4.053-338.837, p = 0.001), while feeling well or very well informed by television/radio was associated with a reduced diagnosis (OR: 0.223, 95% CI: 0.057-0.878, p = 0.032). Being married was associated with increased adherence to all prevention measures (OR: 4.598, 95% CI: 1.481-14.27, p = 0.008), whereas internet use as a source of information was independently associated with a reduced chance of adherence (OR: 0.240; 95% CI: 0.080-0.722, p = 0.011).

Conclusion: Despite many individuals reporting a lack of information from healthcare professionals about the pandemic, substantial adherence to protective measures was observed. Our findings highlight the critical importance of preventive measures during the pandemic, especially for vulnerable populations with limited access to healthcare services, and underscore the need for effective communication strategies to combat misinformation, particularly on social media platforms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西非裔社区(Quilombo)的COVID-19大流行。
目标:2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了将社会脆弱性理解为公共卫生的关键要素的重要性。本研究调查了巴西非洲裔社区(quilombo),即被奴役非洲人的后裔,对COVID-19的看法和做法。方法:这项横断面研究于2021年7月通过对巴西quilombola社区每个家庭的成年代表进行调查进行。结果:在188名受访者中,45.2%的人表示他们觉得卫生保健专业人员没有充分告知他们。研究发现,人们高度遵守预防措施(戴口罩,使用含酒精的凝胶消毒剂,只在必要时才出门,接种COVID-19疫苗)。只有6.9%的家庭成员报告感染了COVID-19,只有一例需要住院治疗,没有死亡。高等教育程度与家庭中COVID-19诊断增加相关(OR: 37.058, 95% CI: 4.053-338.837, p = 0.001),而通过电视/广播获得良好或非常好的信息与诊断减少相关(OR: 0.223, 95% CI: 0.057-0.878, p = 0.032)。结婚与加强对所有预防措施的依从性相关(OR: 4.598, 95% CI: 1.481-14.27, p = 0.008),而使用互联网作为信息来源与降低依从性的机会独立相关(OR: 0.240;95% CI: 0.080-0.722, p = 0.011)。结论:尽管许多个人报告缺乏卫生保健专业人员关于大流行的信息,但观察到大量遵守保护措施。我们的研究结果强调了在大流行期间采取预防措施的重要性,特别是对于获得医疗保健服务有限的弱势群体,并强调需要有效的沟通战略来打击错误信息,特别是在社交媒体平台上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
期刊最新文献
Financing Universal Healthcare Coverage in Nigeria Through the Basic Health Care Provision Fund: Challenges and Potential Solutions. A Case Report of a Mixed-Methods Assessment of Patient Experiences to Inform Quality Improvement in an Emergency Department in Argentina. Defining Health Management: A Conceptual Foundation for Excellence Through Efficiency, Sustainability and Equity. A Next Available Appointment (NAA) Tool to Better Manage Patient Delay Risk and Patient Scheduling Expectations in Specialist Clinics. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Long-Acting and Permanent Methods (LAPMs) of Family Planning Among Women of Reproductive Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1