Long-term Outcomes of the AcoArt II-BTK Trial: Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1177/15266028241304303
Guoyi Sun, Jie Liu, Xin Jia, Jiang Xiong, Xiaohui Ma, Hongpeng Zhang, Wei Guo
{"title":"Long-term Outcomes of the AcoArt II-BTK Trial: Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions.","authors":"Guoyi Sun, Jie Liu, Xin Jia, Jiang Xiong, Xiaohui Ma, Hongpeng Zhang, Wei Guo","doi":"10.1177/15266028241304303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Previous studies have indicated mixed short-term outcomes between drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of infrapopliteal lesions. However, the long-term durability of DCB angioplasty remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to present the long-term outcomes of DCB angioplasty for infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The AcoArt II-BTK Trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial that enrolled 120 patients with CLI. The patients were randomized 1:1 to DCB angioplasty or PTA. Assessments over 5 years included freedom from all-cause death, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and occurrence of major amputation. Additional endpoints included the rate of composite major adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 5 years, patients treated with DCB angioplasty demonstrated a higher rate of freedom from all-cause death than patients treated with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimate 74.6% vs 57.2%; log-rank p=0.04). The major amputation rate was 5.2% for DCB angioplasty compared with 1.8% for PTA (log-rank p=0.347). Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 70.5% and 53.7%, respectively (log-rank p=0.058). The rate of composite major adverse events was 34.5% for DCB angioplasty and 56.1% for PTA (log-rank p=0.013), and this statistically significant difference persisted throughout the 5-year follow-up period. Conclusion:Infrapopliteal artery revascularization in patients with CLI using Litos/Tulip DCB angioplasty showed superior 5-year overall survival compared with PTA. The DCB angioplasty group had a consistently lower rate of major adverse events within 5 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>The use of DCB in infrapopliteal arterial lesions has been controversial regarding both early and mid-term outcomes, with limited data on long-term results. However, this article demonstrates that the Litos/Tulip DCB exhibits favorable long-term outcomes in infrapopliteal artery lesions. These positive findings provide robust evidence supporting the use of DCB in treating infrapopliteal artery disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241304303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241304303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies have indicated mixed short-term outcomes between drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of infrapopliteal lesions. However, the long-term durability of DCB angioplasty remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to present the long-term outcomes of DCB angioplasty for infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

Materials and methods: The AcoArt II-BTK Trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial that enrolled 120 patients with CLI. The patients were randomized 1:1 to DCB angioplasty or PTA. Assessments over 5 years included freedom from all-cause death, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and occurrence of major amputation. Additional endpoints included the rate of composite major adverse events.

Results: Over 5 years, patients treated with DCB angioplasty demonstrated a higher rate of freedom from all-cause death than patients treated with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimate 74.6% vs 57.2%; log-rank p=0.04). The major amputation rate was 5.2% for DCB angioplasty compared with 1.8% for PTA (log-rank p=0.347). Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 70.5% and 53.7%, respectively (log-rank p=0.058). The rate of composite major adverse events was 34.5% for DCB angioplasty and 56.1% for PTA (log-rank p=0.013), and this statistically significant difference persisted throughout the 5-year follow-up period. Conclusion:Infrapopliteal artery revascularization in patients with CLI using Litos/Tulip DCB angioplasty showed superior 5-year overall survival compared with PTA. The DCB angioplasty group had a consistently lower rate of major adverse events within 5 years of follow-up.

Clinical impact: The use of DCB in infrapopliteal arterial lesions has been controversial regarding both early and mid-term outcomes, with limited data on long-term results. However, this article demonstrates that the Litos/Tulip DCB exhibits favorable long-term outcomes in infrapopliteal artery lesions. These positive findings provide robust evidence supporting the use of DCB in treating infrapopliteal artery disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AcoArt II-BTK试验的长期结果:药物包被球囊血管成形术与未包被球囊治疗腘下动脉病变的比较
目的:以往的研究表明,药物包被球囊血管成形术(DCB)和经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)治疗腘窝下病变的短期疗效不一。然而,DCB血管成形术的长期耐久性仍不确定。本研究的目的是介绍DCB血管成形术治疗重度肢体缺血(CLI)患者膝下病变的长期结果。材料和方法:AcoArt II-BTK试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、单盲试验,纳入120例CLI患者。患者按1:1的比例随机分为DCB血管成形术组和PTA组。5年的评估包括无全因死亡,无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术,以及发生主要截肢。其他终点包括复合主要不良事件发生率。结果:5年内,DCB血管成形术患者的全因死亡率高于PTA患者(Kaplan-Meier估计74.6% vs 57.2%;log-rank p = 0.04)。DCB血管成形术的主要截肢率为5.2%,PTA为1.8% (log-rank p=0.347)。临床驱动的靶病变血运重建自由度分别为70.5%和53.7% (log-rank p=0.058)。DCB血管成形术组的综合主要不良事件发生率为34.5%,PTA组为56.1% (log-rank p=0.013),这一具有统计学意义的差异在5年随访期间持续存在。结论:与PTA相比,应用Litos/Tulip DCB血管成形术对CLI患者进行腘下动脉重建术的5年总生存率更高。DCB血管成形术组在5年随访期间的主要不良事件发生率始终较低。临床影响:DCB在髌下动脉病变中的应用在早期和中期预后方面一直存在争议,长期结果数据有限。然而,这篇文章表明,Litos/Tulip DCB在腘下动脉病变中表现出良好的长期效果。这些积极的发现提供了强有力的证据,支持使用DCB治疗髌下动脉疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous Superficial Temporal Artery Access Facilitating Carotid Artery Stenting Performed From Distal Radial Artery. Stent Implantation and Thromboendarterectomy for the Common Femoral Artery in Real-World Practice. Endovascular Treatment for Isolated Infected Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Initial Clinical Experience With AneuFix Injectable Biocompatible Elastomer for Translumbar Embolization of Type 2 Endoleaks. Long-Term Follow-up of Subjects With Iliac Occlusive Disease Treated With the Viabahn VBX Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1