Outcomes of transperineal reanastomosis as a salvage treatment for recurrent vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis after radical prostatectomy.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.4081/aiua.2024.12829
Piotr Gwara, Łukasz Białek, Marta Rydzińska, Jakub Dobruch, Michał Andrzej Skrzypczyk
{"title":"Outcomes of transperineal reanastomosis as a salvage treatment for recurrent vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis after radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Piotr Gwara, Łukasz Białek, Marta Rydzińska, Jakub Dobruch, Michał Andrzej Skrzypczyk","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.12829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate transperineal reanastomosis (TRPA) combined with incontinence surgery as a complex treatment for recurring vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 8 patients who underwent TRPA for recurring VUAS. Detailed preoperative and follow up data were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow up lasted 47 months (range 17-77) with mean age being 63.4 years (range 61-70). All patients achieved patency and 87.5% (7/8) maintained it to the end of follow up. However, four of them required additional procedures to retain patency. Six underwent incontinence surgery - artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation - after which one cuff erosion occurred. In the end 62.5% (5/8) of patients achieved patent urethra and continence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TRPA combined with incontinence surgery is a reasonable treatment for patients with recurrent VUAS. Nonetheless, this is a set of difficult surgeries that may ultimately end in failure, i.e. the inability to restore urethral patency, urinary incontinence or urinary diversion, hence they should be performed by experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":"96 4","pages":"12829"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.12829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate transperineal reanastomosis (TRPA) combined with incontinence surgery as a complex treatment for recurring vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 8 patients who underwent TRPA for recurring VUAS. Detailed preoperative and follow up data were assessed.

Results: Mean follow up lasted 47 months (range 17-77) with mean age being 63.4 years (range 61-70). All patients achieved patency and 87.5% (7/8) maintained it to the end of follow up. However, four of them required additional procedures to retain patency. Six underwent incontinence surgery - artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation - after which one cuff erosion occurred. In the end 62.5% (5/8) of patients achieved patent urethra and continence.

Conclusions: TRPA combined with incontinence surgery is a reasonable treatment for patients with recurrent VUAS. Nonetheless, this is a set of difficult surgeries that may ultimately end in failure, i.e. the inability to restore urethral patency, urinary incontinence or urinary diversion, hence they should be performed by experienced surgeons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经会阴再吻合术作为根治性前列腺切除术后复发性膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄的挽救治疗方法的效果。
目的:探讨经会阴吻合术(TRPA)联合失禁手术治疗根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后复发性膀胱尿道吻合术(VUAS)的综合治疗方法。方法:回顾性分析8例接受TRPA治疗复发性vas的患者。详细的术前和随访资料进行评估。结果:平均随访47个月(范围17 ~ 77),平均年龄63.4岁(范围61 ~ 70)。所有患者均通畅,87.5%(7/8)患者保持通畅至随访结束。然而,其中4例需要额外的程序来保持通畅。6人接受了失禁手术——人工尿括约肌(AUS)植入——之后发生了一次尿囊糜烂。62.5%(5/8)的患者达到尿道通畅和尿失禁。结论:TRPA联合失禁手术治疗复发性VUAS是一种合理的治疗方法。然而,这是一组困难的手术,最终可能以失败告终,即无法恢复尿道通畅,尿失禁或尿分流,因此应由经验丰富的外科医生进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Urogenital and extra genital mutilation in gender-affirming surgery: are we violating primum non nocere? Editorial Comment on "Lady Urologist and male patients with prostate cancer". Predictive role of lactylation-related gene signature in the prognosis and immunotherapy response in bladder cancer. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the simultaneous implant of a penile prosthesis: ten years follow up. A comprehensive systematic review of studies on the potential of A49T and V89L polymorphism in SRD5AR2 as high susceptibility gene association with benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1