Attitudes toward Death, Perceptions of Hospice Care and Needs for Hospice Care among the LGBT Population.

Sook Jung Kang, Hae In Jang
{"title":"Attitudes toward Death, Perceptions of Hospice Care and Needs for Hospice Care among the LGBT Population.","authors":"Sook Jung Kang, Hae In Jang","doi":"10.14475/jhpc.2024.27.4.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explored the attitudes of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals toward death and their perceptions of hospice and palliative care, as well as their care needs. It also investigated their preferences for alternative decision-making and advance care planning options at the end of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive survey study was conducted with LGBT adults aged 18 and older. Participants were recruited through LGBT organizations and online communities, and data from 207 respondents were analyzed. Questionnaires were utilized to assess attitudes toward death, perceptions of hospice care, and care needs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0, employing the t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LGBT individuals generally had low attitudes toward death and negative perceptions of hospice care. Attitudes toward death varied significantly by sex, age, and education, while perceptions of hospice care differed significantly by sexual orientation and education. Care needs in hospice settings also varied significantly by age, gender identity, and education. Most LGBT participants preferred their biological family members (52%) and partners (39%) as surrogate decision-makers. A significant positive correlation was found between perceptions of hospice care and overall care needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the need for healthcare services tailored to LGBT individuals' specific needs. It is necessary to promote social understanding, awareness, and policy support to improve the quality of life for LGBT individuals through more inclusive and responsive healthcare services. It also points to the need for healthcare professionals to increase their awareness and understanding of these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":73780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospice and palliative care","volume":"27 4","pages":"149-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospice and palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14475/jhpc.2024.27.4.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored the attitudes of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals toward death and their perceptions of hospice and palliative care, as well as their care needs. It also investigated their preferences for alternative decision-making and advance care planning options at the end of life.

Methods: A descriptive survey study was conducted with LGBT adults aged 18 and older. Participants were recruited through LGBT organizations and online communities, and data from 207 respondents were analyzed. Questionnaires were utilized to assess attitudes toward death, perceptions of hospice care, and care needs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0, employing the t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results: LGBT individuals generally had low attitudes toward death and negative perceptions of hospice care. Attitudes toward death varied significantly by sex, age, and education, while perceptions of hospice care differed significantly by sexual orientation and education. Care needs in hospice settings also varied significantly by age, gender identity, and education. Most LGBT participants preferred their biological family members (52%) and partners (39%) as surrogate decision-makers. A significant positive correlation was found between perceptions of hospice care and overall care needs.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for healthcare services tailored to LGBT individuals' specific needs. It is necessary to promote social understanding, awareness, and policy support to improve the quality of life for LGBT individuals through more inclusive and responsive healthcare services. It also points to the need for healthcare professionals to increase their awareness and understanding of these issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LGBT人群对死亡的态度、临终关怀的认知及临终关怀的需求。
目的:本研究探讨女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋及跨性别者(LGBT)对死亡的态度、对安宁疗护及缓和疗护的认知,以及他们的疗护需求。它还调查了他们在生命结束时对替代决策和提前护理计划选择的偏好。方法:对18岁及以上的LGBT成年人进行描述性调查研究。参与者是通过LGBT组织和在线社区招募的,并分析了207名受访者的数据。使用问卷评估对死亡的态度、对安宁疗护的认知和疗护需求。统计学分析采用SPSS 20.0,采用t检验、方差分析和Pearson相关系数。结果:LGBT人群对死亡的态度普遍较低,对临终关怀的认知普遍较差。对死亡的态度因性别、年龄和受教育程度而有显著差异,而对临终关怀的看法因性取向和受教育程度而有显著差异。在安宁疗护环境中,疗护需求也因年龄、性别认同和教育程度而显著不同。大多数LGBT参与者更喜欢他们的亲生家庭成员(52%)和伴侣(39%)作为替代决策者。对安宁疗护的认知与整体疗护需求有显著的正相关。结论:研究结果强调了针对LGBT个体特殊需求的医疗服务的必要性。有必要促进社会的理解、意识和政策支持,通过更具包容性和响应性的医疗服务来改善LGBT个人的生活质量。它还指出,医疗保健专业人员需要提高他们对这些问题的认识和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Presentation of Two Patients Compassionately Discharged, from Hospital to Home, Who Did Not Achieve Their Desired Home Death. End-of-life Care, Comfort Care, and Hospice: Terms and Concepts. Nurses' Experience of Good Nursing Care for Terminally Ill and End-of-life Patients: The Client-Nurse, Practice, and Environment Domains. Reorganization of Long-Term Care Insurance for End-of-Life Care. The Use of Baclofen to Control Vertical Nystagmus in a Patient with Advanced Glioma: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1