Perceptions of Coping With Breastfeeding Pain: A Secondary Analysis.

Megan Russell, Ruth Lucas, Katherine Bernier Carney
{"title":"Perceptions of Coping With Breastfeeding Pain: A Secondary Analysis.","authors":"Megan Russell, Ruth Lucas, Katherine Bernier Carney","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although there are many known benefits of providing human milk to infants, breastfeeding-related pain is a significant reason for breastfeeding cessation. Breastfeeding-related pain is a unique experience due to breastfeeding's goal-directed purpose, repetitive nature, and socio-emotional reflections of successful parenting. Understanding how lactating parents cope with breastfeeding-related pain will inform clinical practice to encourage individuals to meet their lactation goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate how lactating parents view coping with breastfeeding-related pain to be different from coping with other types of pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a pilot randomized control study of a breastfeeding pain self-management intervention. Data from 57 participants who breastfed and completed self-report surveys at 1, 2, and 6 weeks postpartum were included. We employed Boyatzis' thematic analysis method to evaluate affirmative responses to \"Is coping with breastfeeding pain different than coping with other pain?\" We evaluated correlations between responses to coping with breastfeeding pain and pain severity scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3 main themes: (1) uncharted waters, (2) light at the end of the tunnel, and (3) parental role and responsibility. No significant differences were detected between the pain scores of individuals who viewed coping with breastfeeding to be different and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Lactating parents reported an array of psychological coping strategies in response to breastfeeding-related pain. Coping processes were influenced by personal goals, parental role evaluations, and a desire to meet their infant's needs. Interventions during prenatal and postpartum care that incorporate individualized coping strategies could support breastfeeding goal attainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although there are many known benefits of providing human milk to infants, breastfeeding-related pain is a significant reason for breastfeeding cessation. Breastfeeding-related pain is a unique experience due to breastfeeding's goal-directed purpose, repetitive nature, and socio-emotional reflections of successful parenting. Understanding how lactating parents cope with breastfeeding-related pain will inform clinical practice to encourage individuals to meet their lactation goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate how lactating parents view coping with breastfeeding-related pain to be different from coping with other types of pain.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a pilot randomized control study of a breastfeeding pain self-management intervention. Data from 57 participants who breastfed and completed self-report surveys at 1, 2, and 6 weeks postpartum were included. We employed Boyatzis' thematic analysis method to evaluate affirmative responses to "Is coping with breastfeeding pain different than coping with other pain?" We evaluated correlations between responses to coping with breastfeeding pain and pain severity scores.

Results: We identified 3 main themes: (1) uncharted waters, (2) light at the end of the tunnel, and (3) parental role and responsibility. No significant differences were detected between the pain scores of individuals who viewed coping with breastfeeding to be different and those who did not.

Discussion: Lactating parents reported an array of psychological coping strategies in response to breastfeeding-related pain. Coping processes were influenced by personal goals, parental role evaluations, and a desire to meet their infant's needs. Interventions during prenatal and postpartum care that incorporate individualized coping strategies could support breastfeeding goal attainment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对母乳喂养疼痛的看法:二次分析。
导读:虽然母乳喂养对婴儿有许多已知的好处,但与母乳喂养有关的疼痛是停止母乳喂养的一个重要原因。母乳喂养相关的疼痛是一种独特的经历,这是由于母乳喂养的目标导向的目的、重复的性质以及成功育儿的社会情感反映。了解哺乳期父母如何应对与母乳喂养有关的疼痛将为临床实践提供信息,以鼓励个人实现他们的哺乳目标。本研究的目的是评估哺乳期父母如何看待应对母乳喂养相关的疼痛与应对其他类型的疼痛不同。方法:我们对一项母乳喂养疼痛自我管理干预的试点随机对照研究进行了二次分析。数据来自57名母乳喂养的参与者,并在产后1、2和6周完成了自我报告调查。我们采用Boyatzis的主题分析方法来评估“应对母乳喂养疼痛与应对其他疼痛不同吗?”我们评估了应对母乳喂养疼痛的反应与疼痛严重程度评分之间的相关性。结果:我们确定了三个主要主题:(1)未知的水域,(2)隧道尽头的光明,(3)父母的角色和责任。在那些认为应对母乳喂养不同的人和那些认为应对母乳喂养不同的人之间,没有发现明显的差异。讨论:哺乳期父母报告了一系列心理应对策略,以应对母乳喂养相关的疼痛。应对过程受个人目标、父母角色评价和满足婴儿需求的愿望的影响。产前和产后护理期间的干预措施,包括个性化的应对策略,可以支持母乳喂养目标的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The OptiBreech Trial Feasibility Study: A Qualitative Inventory of the Roles and Responsibilities of Breech Specialist Midwives. Mothers' Experiences of Institutional Betrayal During Childbirth and their Postpartum Mental Health Outcomes: Evidence From a Survey of New Mothers in the United States. An Interprofessional Collaboration Between a Community-Based Doula Organization and Clinical Partners: The Champion Dyad Initiative. Perinatal Suicide. Self-Compassion and Psychosocial Well-Being After Traumatic Births: Caring for the Midwife.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1