A new measure of professional caregiver coping in long-term care: The LTC COPE

Philip D. Sloane, Sheryl Zimmerman, Lea Efird-Green, Jasmine L. Travers, Krista M. Perreira, Karen Bluth, Christine Lathren, David Reed
{"title":"A new measure of professional caregiver coping in long-term care: The LTC COPE","authors":"Philip D. Sloane,&nbsp;Sheryl Zimmerman,&nbsp;Lea Efird-Green,&nbsp;Jasmine L. Travers,&nbsp;Krista M. Perreira,&nbsp;Karen Bluth,&nbsp;Christine Lathren,&nbsp;David Reed","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>The professional caregiver workforce (nursing assistants and personal care aides) is critical to quality of care and quality of life in nursing home (NH) and assisted living (AL) settings. The work is highly stressful, so improving responses to stress in this workforce could contribute to satisfaction and retention. This research developed a coping measure appropriate for the diverse professional caregiver workforce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>A multistage process identified and refined existing and new items. Ten racially and ethnically diverse professional caregivers advised on item selection and refinement. Subsequently, using an online QR code-accessed questionnaire, data were collected from 391 professional caregivers from 10 NHs and 3 AL communities in three states, yielding a sample that was 87% female, widely distributed in age and experience, and racially/ethnically diverse (42% Black, non-Hispanic/Latinx; 25% White, non-Hispanic/Latinx; 20% Hispanic/Latinx; 7% Asian, non-Hispanic/Latinx; and 21% born outside the United States). Analyses examined psychometric properties and principal components analysis identified factors within which items and scales aggregated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The final instrument, named the Long-Term Care Cope (LTC Cope), includes 26 items aggregated into six factors, which explained 60% of the variance: avoidance (five items, loadings 0.58–0.76); adaptive psychological strategies (six items, loadings 0.33–0.89); active engagement (five items, 0.47–0.89); maladaptive psychological strategies (three items, loadings 0.90–0.93); actions to minimize emotional impact (four items, loadings 0.28–0.74); and substance use (three items, loadings 0.61–0.88). Respondents often reported using multiple items within multiple factors when responding to stressful situations at work.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>The coping strategies of professional caregivers are highly individual, with caregivers tending to utilize multiple strategies. The LTC Cope instrument and its component subscales are promising for future research to improve understanding of stress-related coping in this diverse workforce and inform and evaluate interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>A new measure was developed to help us better understand how professional caregivers (nursing assistants and personal care aides) deal with work-related stress.</li>\n \n <li>Professional caregivers in nursing homes and assisted living tend to use multiple approaches to deal with job stress.</li>\n \n <li>Ways professional caregivers cope with stress vary widely—some address problems directly, some try to deal with the emotional toll of the work, and others involve avoiding the problems or their emotional consequences.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The professional caregiver workforce (nursing assistants and personal care aides) is critical to quality of care and quality of life in nursing home (NH) and assisted living (AL) settings. The work is highly stressful, so improving responses to stress in this workforce could contribute to satisfaction and retention. This research developed a coping measure appropriate for the diverse professional caregiver workforce.

METHODS

A multistage process identified and refined existing and new items. Ten racially and ethnically diverse professional caregivers advised on item selection and refinement. Subsequently, using an online QR code-accessed questionnaire, data were collected from 391 professional caregivers from 10 NHs and 3 AL communities in three states, yielding a sample that was 87% female, widely distributed in age and experience, and racially/ethnically diverse (42% Black, non-Hispanic/Latinx; 25% White, non-Hispanic/Latinx; 20% Hispanic/Latinx; 7% Asian, non-Hispanic/Latinx; and 21% born outside the United States). Analyses examined psychometric properties and principal components analysis identified factors within which items and scales aggregated.

RESULTS

The final instrument, named the Long-Term Care Cope (LTC Cope), includes 26 items aggregated into six factors, which explained 60% of the variance: avoidance (five items, loadings 0.58–0.76); adaptive psychological strategies (six items, loadings 0.33–0.89); active engagement (five items, 0.47–0.89); maladaptive psychological strategies (three items, loadings 0.90–0.93); actions to minimize emotional impact (four items, loadings 0.28–0.74); and substance use (three items, loadings 0.61–0.88). Respondents often reported using multiple items within multiple factors when responding to stressful situations at work.

DISCUSSION

The coping strategies of professional caregivers are highly individual, with caregivers tending to utilize multiple strategies. The LTC Cope instrument and its component subscales are promising for future research to improve understanding of stress-related coping in this diverse workforce and inform and evaluate interventions.

Highlights

  • A new measure was developed to help us better understand how professional caregivers (nursing assistants and personal care aides) deal with work-related stress.
  • Professional caregivers in nursing homes and assisted living tend to use multiple approaches to deal with job stress.
  • Ways professional caregivers cope with stress vary widely—some address problems directly, some try to deal with the emotional toll of the work, and others involve avoiding the problems or their emotional consequences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期照护中专业照护者应对的新测量:LTC COPE
专业护理人员队伍(护理助理和个人护理助理)对养老院(NH)和辅助生活(AL)环境中的护理质量和生活质量至关重要。这份工作压力很大,所以提高员工对压力的反应有助于提高满意度和保留率。本研究开发了一种适用于不同专业护理人员的应对措施。方法采用多阶段工艺对现有产品和新产品进行鉴定和提炼。10个不同种族和民族的专业护理人员就项目的选择和改进提供了建议。随后,使用在线QR码访问问卷,从三个州10个NHs和3个ai社区的391名专业护理人员中收集数据,得出的样本中87%为女性,年龄和经验分布广泛,种族/民族多样化(42%为黑人,非西班牙裔/拉丁裔;25%白人,非西班牙裔/拉丁裔;20%的西班牙裔/ Latinx;7%亚裔,非西班牙裔/拉丁裔;21%出生在美国以外)。分析检查了心理测量特性,主成分分析确定了项目和量表聚集的因素。结果最终工具LTC Cope包括26个项目,共分为6个因素,解释了60%的方差:回避(5个项目,负荷0.58-0.76);适应性心理策略(6项,负荷0.33-0.89);积极参与(5项,0.47-0.89);适应不良心理策略(3项,负荷0.90-0.93);减少情绪影响的行动(4项,负荷0.28-0.74);物质使用(三项,负荷量为0.61-0.88)。受访者经常报告说,在应对工作中的压力情况时,会在多个因素中使用多个项目。专业照顾者的应对策略是高度个性化的,照顾者倾向于使用多种策略。LTC Cope工具及其组成子量表有望在未来的研究中提高对多样化劳动力中压力相关应对的理解,并为干预措施提供信息和评估。为了帮助我们更好地了解专业护理人员(护理助理和个人护理助理)如何处理与工作有关的压力,研究人员开发了一种新的测量方法。养老院和辅助生活中的专业护理人员倾向于使用多种方法来应对工作压力。专业护理人员应对压力的方式各不相同——有些人直接处理问题,有些人试图处理工作带来的情绪损失,还有一些人则涉及避免问题或其情绪后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Anticholinergic drugs and dementia risk: Using stem cell–based studies to complement pharmacoepidemiology Data-driven discovery of associations between prescribed drugs and dementia risk: A systematic review Perspective: Minimally clinically important “symptomatic” benefit associated with disease modification resulting from anti-amyloid immunotherapy Dynamic neurocognitive adaptation in aging: Development and validation of a new scale Unraveling the impact of blood RANKL and OPG levels on Alzheimer's disease: Independent of bone mineral density and inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1