The Reha-Toolbox Project: Linking Item Subsets of 3 Established Rehabilitation PROMs to 9 Domains of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.007
Alexander Obbarius, Claudia Hartmann, Gregor Liegl, Felix Fischer, Matthias Rose
{"title":"The Reha-Toolbox Project: Linking Item Subsets of 3 Established Rehabilitation PROMs to 9 Domains of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).","authors":"Alexander Obbarius, Claudia Hartmann, Gregor Liegl, Felix Fischer, Matthias Rose","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The overarching goal of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) is to standardize patient-reported outcomes across settings and health conditions globally. Following this purpose, the Reha-Toolbox study aimed to link item subsets of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), the Indicators of Rehabilitation Status (IRES-3), and the Hamburg Modules for the Assessment of Psychosocial Health (HEALTH-49) to the standardized metrics provided by PROMIS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, single-group linking study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Experts (N=5) mapped items from the 3 rehabilitation measures to PROMIS scales. Data were collected online from a general population sample (N=1000). Items from the rehabilitation measures and their corresponding PROMIS short forms were administered to facilitate item linkage.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>WHODAS 2.0, IRES-3, HEALTH-49, and PROMIS scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 96 of 171 outcome items (56%) from the legacy measures and 1 additional IRES-3 item were mapped to 9 PROMIS domains, including pain interference, physical function, dyspnea, fatigue, depression, anxiety, cognitive function, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities. Ninety-five items fulfilled the linking assumptions of construct similarity, unidimensionality, and measurement invariance. The legacy items were successfully calibrated on the corresponding PROMIS metrics using graded-response models. The range and precision of the measures varied, depending on the number of items in each domain. Domains that were assessed with 4 or more items achieved sufficient reliability for group-based analyses. Crosswalk tables were created for each measure and domain. We discussed the reasons for and implications of the fact that the rehabilitation measures were only partially linked to the PROMIS metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study achieved robust linking between subsets of WHODAS 2.0, IRES-3, HEALTH-49 items, and 9 PROMIS scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The overarching goal of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) is to standardize patient-reported outcomes across settings and health conditions globally. Following this purpose, the Reha-Toolbox study aimed to link item subsets of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), the Indicators of Rehabilitation Status (IRES-3), and the Hamburg Modules for the Assessment of Psychosocial Health (HEALTH-49) to the standardized metrics provided by PROMIS.

Design: Cross-sectional, single-group linking study.

Setting: Online survey.

Participants: Experts (N=5) mapped items from the 3 rehabilitation measures to PROMIS scales. Data were collected online from a general population sample (N=1000). Items from the rehabilitation measures and their corresponding PROMIS short forms were administered to facilitate item linkage.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: WHODAS 2.0, IRES-3, HEALTH-49, and PROMIS scales.

Results: Overall, 96 of 171 outcome items (56%) from the legacy measures and 1 additional IRES-3 item were mapped to 9 PROMIS domains, including pain interference, physical function, dyspnea, fatigue, depression, anxiety, cognitive function, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities. Ninety-five items fulfilled the linking assumptions of construct similarity, unidimensionality, and measurement invariance. The legacy items were successfully calibrated on the corresponding PROMIS metrics using graded-response models. The range and precision of the measures varied, depending on the number of items in each domain. Domains that were assessed with 4 or more items achieved sufficient reliability for group-based analyses. Crosswalk tables were created for each measure and domain. We discussed the reasons for and implications of the fact that the rehabilitation measures were only partially linked to the PROMIS metrics.

Conclusions: The study achieved robust linking between subsets of WHODAS 2.0, IRES-3, HEALTH-49 items, and 9 PROMIS scales.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复工具箱项目:将三个已建立的康复项目的项目子集与患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)的九个领域联系起来。
目的:患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)的首要目标是在全球范围内标准化患者报告的结果(PROs)。基于这一目的,康复工具箱研究旨在将世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS 2.0)、康复状况指标(IRES-3)和心理社会健康评估汉堡模块(Health -49)的项目子集与PROMIS提供的标准化指标联系起来。设计:横断面,单组关联研究设置:在线调查参与者:五名专家将三种康复措施中的项目映射到PROMIS量表中。数据是在网上从普通人群中抽取1000人作为样本收集的。对康复措施中的项目及其相应的PROMIS简短表格进行管理,以促进项目联系。主要结局测量:WHODAS 2.0、IRES-3、HEALTH-49、PROMIS量表结果:总体而言,遗留测量的171个结局项目中的96个(56%)和1个额外的IRES-3项目被映射到9个PROMIS领域,包括疼痛干扰、身体功能、呼吸困难、疲劳、抑郁、焦虑、认知功能、参与社会角色和活动的能力以及参与社会角色和活动的满意度。95个项目满足构念相似性、单维性和测量不变性的关联假设。遗留项目使用分级响应模型在相应的PROMIS指标上成功校准。测量的范围和精度各不相同,取决于每个领域中项目的数量。用四个或更多项目评估的领域对于基于组的分析具有足够的可靠性。为每个度量和域创建了人行横道表。我们讨论了康复措施与PROMIS指标仅部分相关的原因和影响。结论:本研究实现了WHODAS 2.0、IRES-3、HEALTH-49项目亚组与9个PROMIS量表之间的强效关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Individualized Physiotherapy and Activity Coaching in Multiple Sclerosis (IPAC-MS): Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparative Cost Analysis of Neck Pain Treatments for Medicare Beneficiaries. Corrigendum. Prevalence of Chronic Health Conditions Among People with Disabilities in the United States. Exploring rest advice in fatigue interventions in rehabilitation among adults with long-term conditions: a systematic scoping review of the reporting of rest in randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1