The Reha-Toolbox project: Linking item subsets of three established rehabilitation PROMs to nine domains of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.007
Alexander Obbarius, Claudia Hartmann, Gregor Liegl, Felix Fischer, Matthias Rose
{"title":"The Reha-Toolbox project: Linking item subsets of three established rehabilitation PROMs to nine domains of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).","authors":"Alexander Obbarius, Claudia Hartmann, Gregor Liegl, Felix Fischer, Matthias Rose","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The overarching goal of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) is to standardize patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across settings and health conditions globally. Following this purpose, the Reha-Toolbox study aimed to link item subsets of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), the Indicators of Rehabilitation Status (IRES-3), and the Hamburg Modules for the Assessment of Psychosocial Health (HEALTH-49) to the standardized metrics provided by PROMIS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, single-group linking study SETTING: Online survey PARTICIPANTS: Five experts mapped items from the three rehabilitation measures to PROMIS scales. Data were collected online from a sample of 1000 individuals from the general population. Items from the rehabilitation measures and their corresponding PROMIS short forms were administered to facilitate item linkage.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: WHODAS 2.0, IRES-3, HEALTH-49, PROMIS scales RESULTS: Overall, 96 of 171 outcome Items (56%) from the legacy measures and one additional IRES-3 item were mapped to nine PROMIS domains, including pain interference, physical function, dyspnea, fatigue, depression, anxiety, cognitive function, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities. 95 items fulfilled the linking assumptions of construct similarity, unidimensionality, and measurement invariance. The legacy items were successfully calibrated on the corresponding PROMIS metrics using graded-response models. The range and precision of the measures varied, depending on the number of items in each domain. Domains that were assessed with four or more items achieved sufficient reliability for group-based analyses. Crosswalk tables were created for each measure and domain. We discussed the reasons for and implications of the fact that the rehabilitation measures were only partially linked to the PROMIS metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study achieved robust linking between subsets of WHODAS 2.0, IRES-3, HEALTH-49 items, and nine PROMIS scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The overarching goal of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) is to standardize patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across settings and health conditions globally. Following this purpose, the Reha-Toolbox study aimed to link item subsets of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), the Indicators of Rehabilitation Status (IRES-3), and the Hamburg Modules for the Assessment of Psychosocial Health (HEALTH-49) to the standardized metrics provided by PROMIS.

Design: Cross-sectional, single-group linking study SETTING: Online survey PARTICIPANTS: Five experts mapped items from the three rehabilitation measures to PROMIS scales. Data were collected online from a sample of 1000 individuals from the general population. Items from the rehabilitation measures and their corresponding PROMIS short forms were administered to facilitate item linkage.

Interventions: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: WHODAS 2.0, IRES-3, HEALTH-49, PROMIS scales RESULTS: Overall, 96 of 171 outcome Items (56%) from the legacy measures and one additional IRES-3 item were mapped to nine PROMIS domains, including pain interference, physical function, dyspnea, fatigue, depression, anxiety, cognitive function, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and satisfaction with participation in social roles and activities. 95 items fulfilled the linking assumptions of construct similarity, unidimensionality, and measurement invariance. The legacy items were successfully calibrated on the corresponding PROMIS metrics using graded-response models. The range and precision of the measures varied, depending on the number of items in each domain. Domains that were assessed with four or more items achieved sufficient reliability for group-based analyses. Crosswalk tables were created for each measure and domain. We discussed the reasons for and implications of the fact that the rehabilitation measures were only partially linked to the PROMIS metrics.

Conclusion: The study achieved robust linking between subsets of WHODAS 2.0, IRES-3, HEALTH-49 items, and nine PROMIS scales.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Employment outcomes among clients with stroke utilizing public vocational rehabilitation services in the United States. Impact of a community-based peer-led eHealth wheelchair skills training program: A randomized control trial. Comparing the different sets of item-diagnostic criteria of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R): a measurement-based approach driven by Rasch analysis. Constant torque stretching in ankle contractures results in greater changes in range of motion than constant angle or dynamic stretching: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical and psychosocial consequences of falls in ambulatory individuals with cerebral palsy by age and gross motor function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1