Evaluation of Response to Weight-based Dosing Strategies of Continuous, Fixed-Rate Atracurium Infusions in Critically Ill, Obese Adults With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Krishn S Patel, Gretchen L Sacha, Heather Torbic, Stephanie Bass, Lu Wang, Abhijit Duggal, Michael A Rudoni
{"title":"Evaluation of Response to Weight-based Dosing Strategies of Continuous, Fixed-Rate Atracurium Infusions in Critically Ill, Obese Adults With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.","authors":"Krishn S Patel, Gretchen L Sacha, Heather Torbic, Stephanie Bass, Lu Wang, Abhijit Duggal, Michael A Rudoni","doi":"10.1177/10600280241304406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fixed-rate infusions of weight-based neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were adopted during the COVID pandemic to limit caregiver exposure during titrations. Although fixed-rate infusions are supported in studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the optimal scalar for weight-based NMBAs in patients with obesity remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to compare change in oxygenation using two weight-based dosing strategies for atracurium in obese patients with ARDS. Secondary outcomes included total atracurium dose, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilator-free days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following an institutional practice update to use ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with obesity, we retrospectively compared adults (≥18 years) with ARDS and a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who received atracurium (15 µg/kg/min) based on actual body weight (ABW) with those using IBW. The primary outcome was change in PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio (P/F) 48 hours after atracurium initiation. Analysis-of-covariance compared change in P/F between groups after adjustment for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IBW group (<i>n</i> = 123), compared with the ABW group (<i>n</i> = 133), had lower baseline P/F (85.0 [71.0, 118.3] vs 93.3 [76.0, 128.3], <i>P</i> = 0.025) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (9.7 ± 2.6 vs 10.5 ± 2.6, <i>P</i> = 0.015), with greater use of steroids (96% vs 89%, <i>P</i> = 0.032) and prone positioning (72% vs 58%, <i>P</i> = 0.015). No difference was detected in change in P/F at 48 hours (adjusted least squares mean [95% confidence interval, CI]: 55.8 [37.0, 74.5] vs 56.9 [39.6, 74.1], <i>P</i> = 0.90). Atracurium doses were higher in the ABW group (97.4 mg/h [84.4, 110.3] vs 55.4 [47.2, 65.7], <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and ICU-free days or ventilator-free days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In patients with obesity with ARDS receiving fixed-rate atracurium infusions, the change in P/F at 48 hours did not differ based on weight. Atracurium dosed on IBW may use less total drug without compromising ability to improve oxygenation. This is the first study comparing the dosing weight used for continuous infusion atracurium in hospitalized, critically ill ARDS patients with obesity. Additional studies are warranted to optimize dosing in obese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280241304406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241304406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fixed-rate infusions of weight-based neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were adopted during the COVID pandemic to limit caregiver exposure during titrations. Although fixed-rate infusions are supported in studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the optimal scalar for weight-based NMBAs in patients with obesity remains controversial.
Objective: This study sought to compare change in oxygenation using two weight-based dosing strategies for atracurium in obese patients with ARDS. Secondary outcomes included total atracurium dose, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilator-free days.
Methods: Following an institutional practice update to use ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with obesity, we retrospectively compared adults (≥18 years) with ARDS and a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who received atracurium (15 µg/kg/min) based on actual body weight (ABW) with those using IBW. The primary outcome was change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) 48 hours after atracurium initiation. Analysis-of-covariance compared change in P/F between groups after adjustment for confounders.
Results: The IBW group (n = 123), compared with the ABW group (n = 133), had lower baseline P/F (85.0 [71.0, 118.3] vs 93.3 [76.0, 128.3], P = 0.025) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (9.7 ± 2.6 vs 10.5 ± 2.6, P = 0.015), with greater use of steroids (96% vs 89%, P = 0.032) and prone positioning (72% vs 58%, P = 0.015). No difference was detected in change in P/F at 48 hours (adjusted least squares mean [95% confidence interval, CI]: 55.8 [37.0, 74.5] vs 56.9 [39.6, 74.1], P = 0.90). Atracurium doses were higher in the ABW group (97.4 mg/h [84.4, 110.3] vs 55.4 [47.2, 65.7], P < 0.001). There was no difference in hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and ICU-free days or ventilator-free days.
Conclusion and relevance: In patients with obesity with ARDS receiving fixed-rate atracurium infusions, the change in P/F at 48 hours did not differ based on weight. Atracurium dosed on IBW may use less total drug without compromising ability to improve oxygenation. This is the first study comparing the dosing weight used for continuous infusion atracurium in hospitalized, critically ill ARDS patients with obesity. Additional studies are warranted to optimize dosing in obese patients.
背景:在COVID大流行期间,采用固定速率输注基于体重的神经肌肉阻滞剂(nmba),以限制滴定期间护理人员的暴露。尽管在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的研究中支持固定速率输注,但肥胖患者基于体重的NMBAs的最佳标量仍然存在争议。目的:本研究旨在比较肥胖ARDS患者使用两种基于体重的阿曲库铵给药策略时氧合的变化。次要结局包括阿曲库铵总剂量、死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)和无呼吸机天数。方法:根据机构实践更新,将理想体重(IBW)用于肥胖患者,我们回顾性比较了患有ARDS且体重指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m2的成人(≥18岁),根据实际体重(ABW)接受阿曲库ium(15µg/kg/min)治疗与使用IBW治疗的患者。主要终点是阿曲库铵起始48小时后PaO2/FiO2比值(P/F)的变化。协方差分析比较了校正混杂因素后各组间P/F的变化。结果:IBW组(n = 123)与ABW组(n = 133)相比,基线P/F (85.0 [71.0, 118.3] vs 93.3 [76.0, 128.3], P = 0.025)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(9.7±2.6 vs 10.5±2.6,P = 0.015)较低,类固醇使用较多(96% vs 89%, P = 0.032)和俯卧位(72% vs 58%, P = 0.015)。48小时P/F变化无差异(校正最小二乘平均值[95%置信区间,CI]: 55.8 [37.0, 74.5] vs 56.9 [39.6, 74.1], P = 0.90)。ABW组阿曲库铵剂量较高(97.4 mg/h [84.4, 110.3] vs 55.4 mg/h [47.2, 65.7], P < 0.001)。住院死亡率、ICU死亡率、无ICU天数或无呼吸机天数均无差异。结论及相关性:在接受固定速率阿曲库铵输注的肥胖合并ARDS患者中,48小时P/F的变化没有因体重而异。在IBW上使用阿曲库铵可以使用较少的总药物而不影响改善氧合的能力。这是第一个比较住院重症ARDS合并肥胖患者持续输注阿曲库铵的剂量重量的研究。需要进一步的研究来优化肥胖患者的用药剂量。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days