Monte Carlo investigation of dose distribution of two model 106Ru/106Rh ophthalmic plaques in a realistic human eye model with different uveal melanoma size

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR Applied Radiation and Isotopes Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111636
Zeinab Fardi, Payvand Taherparvar
{"title":"Monte Carlo investigation of dose distribution of two model 106Ru/106Rh ophthalmic plaques in a realistic human eye model with different uveal melanoma size","authors":"Zeinab Fardi,&nbsp;Payvand Taherparvar","doi":"10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uveal melanoma is the most common primary eye cancer with the highest incidence. BEBIG <sup>106</sup>Ru/<sup>106</sup>Rh ophthalmic plaques more used for the treatment of these eye malignancies, mainly malignancies with small to medium sizes. In this study, we evaluate dose distributions around a voxelized eye phantom due to CCA and CCB eye plaque using GATE code. The phantom contains the important eye substructures with three defined tumors with the same basal diameter and different apical thicknesses of 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm. The validation for source and plaques have been performed by comparing the obtained results for energy spectrum of the source and percentage depth-dose along the central axis of plaques with the available published data. The delivered doses to the eye components and tumors show that received doses by different eye substructures depend on the size of the plaque and tumor thickness. Results show that the knowledge of the height of tumor apex before treating eye tumors with ophthalmic plaques is essential. On the other hand, about 32% (62%) of the dose deposition belongs to secondary produced photons in the CCA (CCB) plaque. Moreover, comparing the results obtained from two plaques, showed that although the CCB plaque produces a more uniform dose distribution in the tumor, the CCA plaque presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for all three tumor sizes. Therefore, it is recommended to use CCA plaque for eye tumors up to 5 mm height of the apex.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8096,"journal":{"name":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 111636"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804324004640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary eye cancer with the highest incidence. BEBIG 106Ru/106Rh ophthalmic plaques more used for the treatment of these eye malignancies, mainly malignancies with small to medium sizes. In this study, we evaluate dose distributions around a voxelized eye phantom due to CCA and CCB eye plaque using GATE code. The phantom contains the important eye substructures with three defined tumors with the same basal diameter and different apical thicknesses of 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm. The validation for source and plaques have been performed by comparing the obtained results for energy spectrum of the source and percentage depth-dose along the central axis of plaques with the available published data. The delivered doses to the eye components and tumors show that received doses by different eye substructures depend on the size of the plaque and tumor thickness. Results show that the knowledge of the height of tumor apex before treating eye tumors with ophthalmic plaques is essential. On the other hand, about 32% (62%) of the dose deposition belongs to secondary produced photons in the CCA (CCB) plaque. Moreover, comparing the results obtained from two plaques, showed that although the CCB plaque produces a more uniform dose distribution in the tumor, the CCA plaque presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for all three tumor sizes. Therefore, it is recommended to use CCA plaque for eye tumors up to 5 mm height of the apex.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monte Carlo研究了两种106Ru/106Rh模型眼斑在不同葡萄膜黑色素瘤大小的真实人眼模型中的剂量分布。
葡萄膜黑色素瘤是最常见的原发性眼癌,发病率最高。BEBIG 106Ru/106Rh眼科斑块多用于治疗这些眼部恶性肿瘤,主要是小到中等大小的恶性肿瘤。在这项研究中,我们使用GATE代码评估了由于CCA和CCB眼斑引起的体素眼幻影周围的剂量分布。幻影包含重要的眼亚结构,有三个明确的肿瘤,基底直径相同,根尖厚度不同,分别为3mm、4mm和5mm。通过将获得的源能谱和沿斑块中轴线的百分比深度剂量与可用的已发表数据进行比较,对源和斑块进行了验证。给眼成分和肿瘤的剂量表明,不同眼亚结构接受的剂量取决于斑块的大小和肿瘤的厚度。结果表明,在治疗伴有眼斑块的眼肿瘤前,了解肿瘤顶点高度是至关重要的。另一方面,约32%(62%)的剂量沉积属于CCA (CCB)斑块中二次产生的光子。此外,比较两种斑块的结果表明,尽管CCB斑块在肿瘤中产生更均匀的剂量分布,但对于所有三种肿瘤大小,CCA斑块对肿瘤的剂量传递更高,对关键结构的剂量传递更低。因此,对于眼肿瘤,建议使用CCA斑块,高度不超过眼尖5mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Radiation and Isotopes
Applied Radiation and Isotopes 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: Applied Radiation and Isotopes provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and peaceful application of nuclear, radiation and radionuclide techniques in chemistry, physics, biochemistry, biology, medicine, security, engineering and in the earth, planetary and environmental sciences, all including dosimetry. Nuclear techniques are defined in the broadest sense and both experimental and theoretical papers are welcome. They include the development and use of α- and β-particles, X-rays and γ-rays, neutrons and other nuclear particles and radiations from all sources, including radionuclides, synchrotron sources, cyclotrons and reactors and from the natural environment. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. Papers dealing with radiation processing, i.e., where radiation is used to bring about a biological, chemical or physical change in a material, should be directed to our sister journal Radiation Physics and Chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of 18F-FDG absorbed dose ratios in percent in adult and pediatric reference phantoms using DoseCalcs Monte Carlo platform Predicting (n,3n) nuclear reaction cross-sections using XGBoost and Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation A methodology study for sodium quantification in bone and soft tissue based on in vivo neutron activation analysis using a two-compartment model Technetium-99m-labeled stealth liposomes: A new Strategy to Identify metastasis in tumour model Based on the thickness equivalent basis effect decomposition method of ore separation by multi-energy X-ray transmission technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1