Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus other bronchodilators in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s12890-024-03445-4
He Zhu, Jiahui Lei, Fan Gao, Yingjie Guo, Limin Zhao
{"title":"Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus other bronchodilators in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.","authors":"He Zhu, Jiahui Lei, Fan Gao, Yingjie Guo, Limin Zhao","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03445-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>UMEC/VI administered via a combination inhaler is associated with a clinically significant improvement in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. However, their efficacy compared to other bronchodilator mono or dual therapies still remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this research was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of UMEC/VI dual and UMEC/VI/FF triple therapies versus alternative bronchodilator regimens in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) to select publications published in peer-reviewed journals written in English. The odds ratio (OR) and risk ratio (RR) was calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochrane Q and I [2] statistics and the appropriate p-value. The analysis used RevMan 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current meta-analysis includes 31,814 COPD patients from 17 RCTs. The meta-analysis results demonstrate that the combination of LABA and LAMA provides additive bronchodilation and improved lung function in COPD patients. We found that UMEC/VI dual therapy significantly improved FEV1 (OR 1.98 [95% CI 1.70-2.30]), TDI values (OR 1.97 [95% CI 1.72-2.26]), and reduced SGRQ total scores (OR 1.99 [95% CI 1.71-2.32]), with fewer drug-related adverse events (RR 0.58 [95% CI 0.53-0.64]). Similarly, UMEC/VI/FF triple therapy also showed similar benefits, with significant improvements in FEV1 (OR 1.93 [95% CI 1.73-2.15]), TDI values (OR 2.37 [95% CI 2.15-2.61]), and reduced SGRQ total scores (OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.63-2.05]), and fewer drug-related adverse events (RR 0.53 [95% CI 0.49-0.58]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis concludes that UMEC and VI combinations are an efficacious treatment option for symptomatic COPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03445-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: UMEC/VI administered via a combination inhaler is associated with a clinically significant improvement in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. However, their efficacy compared to other bronchodilator mono or dual therapies still remains unclear.

Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of UMEC/VI dual and UMEC/VI/FF triple therapies versus alternative bronchodilator regimens in COPD patients.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) to select publications published in peer-reviewed journals written in English. The odds ratio (OR) and risk ratio (RR) was calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochrane Q and I [2] statistics and the appropriate p-value. The analysis used RevMan 5.4.

Results: The current meta-analysis includes 31,814 COPD patients from 17 RCTs. The meta-analysis results demonstrate that the combination of LABA and LAMA provides additive bronchodilation and improved lung function in COPD patients. We found that UMEC/VI dual therapy significantly improved FEV1 (OR 1.98 [95% CI 1.70-2.30]), TDI values (OR 1.97 [95% CI 1.72-2.26]), and reduced SGRQ total scores (OR 1.99 [95% CI 1.71-2.32]), with fewer drug-related adverse events (RR 0.58 [95% CI 0.53-0.64]). Similarly, UMEC/VI/FF triple therapy also showed similar benefits, with significant improvements in FEV1 (OR 1.93 [95% CI 1.73-2.15]), TDI values (OR 2.37 [95% CI 2.15-2.61]), and reduced SGRQ total scores (OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.63-2.05]), and fewer drug-related adverse events (RR 0.53 [95% CI 0.49-0.58]).

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis concludes that UMEC and VI combinations are an efficacious treatment option for symptomatic COPD patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Umeclidinium/Vilanterol与其他支气管扩张剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较疗效评价:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:通过联合吸入器给予UMEC/VI与轻度至中度COPD患者肺功能和健康相关生活质量的临床显着改善相关。然而,与其他支气管扩张剂单药或双药治疗相比,它们的疗效仍不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是评估UMEC/VI双疗法和UMEC/VI/FF三联疗法与其他支气管扩张剂方案在COPD患者中的治疗效果。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Cochrane Library 4个电子数据库,选择发表在英文同行评议期刊上的出版物。计算比值比(OR)和风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间。我们使用Cochrane Q和I[2]统计量和适当的p值来评估异质性。分析使用RevMan 5.4。结果:目前的荟萃分析包括来自17项随机对照试验的31,814名COPD患者。meta分析结果表明,LABA和LAMA联合使用可增加COPD患者的支气管扩张,改善肺功能。我们发现UMEC/VI双重治疗显著改善了FEV1 (OR 1.98 [95% CI 1.70-2.30]), TDI值(OR 1.97 [95% CI 1.72-2.26]),降低了SGRQ总分(OR 1.99 [95% CI 1.71-2.32]),减少了药物相关不良事件(RR 0.58 [95% CI 0.53-0.64])。同样,UMEC/VI/FF三联疗法也显示出类似的益处,FEV1 (OR 1.93 [95% CI 1.73-2.15])、TDI值(OR 2.37 [95% CI 2.15-2.61])、SGRQ总分(OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.63-2.05])显著改善,药物相关不良事件减少(RR 0.53 [95% CI 0.49-0.58])。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,UMEC和VI联合治疗有症状的COPD患者是一种有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Case Report: diagnosis of mixed Scedosporium apiospermum infection assisted by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid morphology. The association between body roundness index and asthma risk in middle-aged and elderly people: a retrospective cohort study based on CHARLS database. CT image-based machine learning models for predicting blood eosinophil levels in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Bronchial artery embolization before endobronchial resection to avoid severe bleeding in central airway obstruction: a single-center retrospective pilot study. Recovery from fulminant immune-related myocarditis induced by ipilimumab plus nivolumab in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1