Clinical significance of lactate-to-albumin ratio in patients with influenza A virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center retrospective study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02843-9
Jinhui Gao, Xuanzhe Yang, Xiang Fang, Ziyi Zhang, Dapeng Wang, Jiajia Wang
{"title":"Clinical significance of lactate-to-albumin ratio in patients with influenza A virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Jinhui Gao, Xuanzhe Yang, Xiang Fang, Ziyi Zhang, Dapeng Wang, Jiajia Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02843-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR) is predictive of disease prognosis in some cases. However, the clinical significance of LAR in patients with influenza A virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has yet to be explored. This study aims to investigate whether LAR can be used as a predictor of influenza A virus-induced ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study, we enrolled 105 patients with influenza A virus pneumonia into the study and divided the patients into an ARDS group (74 patients) and a non-ARDS group (31 patients) during hospitalization. Clinical characteristics and laboratory data were collected within 24 h after admission. We explored the risk factors for ARDS using logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance of potential risk factors for ARDS and ARDS-associated complications were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and Pearson's correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlations between risk factors and clinical and laboratory variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LAR was an independent predictor for the development of ARDS in patients with influenza A virus pneumonia and was significantly predictive for ARDS. LAR's area under the curve (AUC) was higher than that of lactate and albumin alone; its AUC was 0.878, with a sensitivity of 71.6% and a specificity of 96.8%. The optimal ROC threshold for distinguishing ARDS from non-ARDS cases was 44.81 × 10<sup>- 3</sup>. Correlation analysis indicated that LAR was positively associated with duration of invasive ventilation, and APACHE II and SOFA scores in ARDS patients but was negatively associated with PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (p < 0.001). Subsequent ROC curve analysis determined that LAR was a robust predictor for the 14-day invasive ventilation (AUC = 0.924), septic shock (AUC = 0.860), and hepatic injury (AUC = 0.905) in hospitalized ARDS patients. It also showed a promising predictive value for 28-day mortality (AUC = 0.881).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAR strongly predicted ARDS development in patients with influenza A virus pneumonia. It showed a significant correlation with disease severity and provided promising predictive efficiency for extrapulmonary complications and 28-day mortality in patients with influenza A virus-induced ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02843-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR) is predictive of disease prognosis in some cases. However, the clinical significance of LAR in patients with influenza A virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has yet to be explored. This study aims to investigate whether LAR can be used as a predictor of influenza A virus-induced ARDS.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we enrolled 105 patients with influenza A virus pneumonia into the study and divided the patients into an ARDS group (74 patients) and a non-ARDS group (31 patients) during hospitalization. Clinical characteristics and laboratory data were collected within 24 h after admission. We explored the risk factors for ARDS using logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance of potential risk factors for ARDS and ARDS-associated complications were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and Pearson's correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlations between risk factors and clinical and laboratory variables.

Results: LAR was an independent predictor for the development of ARDS in patients with influenza A virus pneumonia and was significantly predictive for ARDS. LAR's area under the curve (AUC) was higher than that of lactate and albumin alone; its AUC was 0.878, with a sensitivity of 71.6% and a specificity of 96.8%. The optimal ROC threshold for distinguishing ARDS from non-ARDS cases was 44.81 × 10- 3. Correlation analysis indicated that LAR was positively associated with duration of invasive ventilation, and APACHE II and SOFA scores in ARDS patients but was negatively associated with PaO2/FiO2 (p < 0.001). Subsequent ROC curve analysis determined that LAR was a robust predictor for the 14-day invasive ventilation (AUC = 0.924), septic shock (AUC = 0.860), and hepatic injury (AUC = 0.905) in hospitalized ARDS patients. It also showed a promising predictive value for 28-day mortality (AUC = 0.881).

Conclusion: LAR strongly predicted ARDS development in patients with influenza A virus pneumonia. It showed a significant correlation with disease severity and provided promising predictive efficiency for extrapulmonary complications and 28-day mortality in patients with influenza A virus-induced ARDS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲型流感病毒引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者乳酸-白蛋白比值的临床意义:一项单中心回顾性研究
背景:乳酸与白蛋白比值(LAR)在某些情况下可预测疾病预后。然而,LAR在甲型流感病毒引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中的临床意义尚待探讨。本研究旨在探讨LAR是否可以作为a型流感病毒诱导的ARDS的预测因子。方法:在单中心回顾性研究中,我们将105例甲型流感病毒肺炎患者纳入研究,并将患者分为住院期间ARDS组(74例)和非ARDS组(31例)。入院后24 h内收集临床特征及实验室资料。我们采用logistic回归分析探讨ARDS的危险因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价潜在危险因素对ARDS及ARDS相关并发症的预测效果,采用Pearson相关分析评价危险因素与临床及实验室变量的相关性。结果:LAR是A型流感病毒肺炎患者发生ARDS的独立预测因子,对ARDS有显著预测作用。LAR的曲线下面积(AUC)高于单独使用乳酸和白蛋白;AUC为0.878,敏感性为71.6%,特异性为96.8%。区分ARDS与非ARDS的最佳ROC阈值为44.81 × 10- 3。相关性分析显示,LAR与ARDS患者有创通气时间、APACHE II和SOFA评分呈正相关,而与PaO2/FiO2呈负相关(p)。结论:LAR对甲型流感病毒肺炎患者ARDS的发展具有较强的预测作用。它显示了与疾病严重程度的显著相关性,并为甲型流感病毒诱导的ARDS患者的肺外并发症和28天死亡率提供了有希望的预测效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Mortality and patient disposition after ICU tracheostomy for secretion management vs. prolonged ventilation: a retrospective cohort study. Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring. Opioid sparing anesthesia in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver resection: a controlled randomized double-blind study. "The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty". A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting perioperative transfusion in children undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1