Effect of continuous infusion in alleviating pain during male urethral catheterization.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02848-4
Lijun Cao, Xin Qi, Dan Liu, Xincheng Mao, Liu Luo, Mengjiang Liu, Xinyi Wen, Chunhong Cui, Jia Qi, Junmei Xu, Yulong Cui
{"title":"Effect of continuous infusion in alleviating pain during male urethral catheterization.","authors":"Lijun Cao, Xin Qi, Dan Liu, Xincheng Mao, Liu Luo, Mengjiang Liu, Xinyi Wen, Chunhong Cui, Jia Qi, Junmei Xu, Yulong Cui","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02848-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore whether continuous infusion causing lubrication can effectively alleviate pain during male urethral catheterization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, double-blinded study included 190 male patients scheduled for urethral catheterization. Patients were randomly allocated into four groups: Group A: the catheter was lubricated with paraffin; Group B: the catheter was lubricated with compound lidocaine gel; Group C: the pump continuously infusing with sterilized water; Group D: the pump continuously infusing with 2% lidocaine. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Statistical analysis system (SAS) (version 9.4) was used to perform all the statistical analyses. Significance for all results was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS of Group D was the lowest (18.90 ± 11.44), followed by the Group C (33.00 ± 11.07), and the VAS of Group A was the highest (53.98 ± 14.76). There were significant differences in VAS in Group D compared to Group A(P < 0.0001), Group B(P < 0.0001) and Group C (P < 0.0001), Group C compared to Group A (P < 0.0001) and Group B(P < 0.0001), Group B compared to Group A (P < 0.0001), indicating that patients treated with lidocaine infusion (Group D) experienced significantly less pain than did those in the other three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous infusion with sterilized water during catheterization is an efficient method for lubricating the urethral mucosa; furthermore, infusion with 2% lidocaine provides better analgesia as well as lubrication.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070866) ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=194591 ) on Apr. 25th, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02848-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to explore whether continuous infusion causing lubrication can effectively alleviate pain during male urethral catheterization.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, double-blinded study included 190 male patients scheduled for urethral catheterization. Patients were randomly allocated into four groups: Group A: the catheter was lubricated with paraffin; Group B: the catheter was lubricated with compound lidocaine gel; Group C: the pump continuously infusing with sterilized water; Group D: the pump continuously infusing with 2% lidocaine. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Statistical analysis system (SAS) (version 9.4) was used to perform all the statistical analyses. Significance for all results was set at P < 0.05.

Results: The VAS of Group D was the lowest (18.90 ± 11.44), followed by the Group C (33.00 ± 11.07), and the VAS of Group A was the highest (53.98 ± 14.76). There were significant differences in VAS in Group D compared to Group A(P < 0.0001), Group B(P < 0.0001) and Group C (P < 0.0001), Group C compared to Group A (P < 0.0001) and Group B(P < 0.0001), Group B compared to Group A (P < 0.0001), indicating that patients treated with lidocaine infusion (Group D) experienced significantly less pain than did those in the other three groups.

Conclusions: Continuous infusion with sterilized water during catheterization is an efficient method for lubricating the urethral mucosa; furthermore, infusion with 2% lidocaine provides better analgesia as well as lubrication.

Trial registration: The study protocol was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070866) ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=194591 ) on Apr. 25th, 2023.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续输注对男性导尿疼痛的缓解作用。
目的:本研究旨在探讨持续输注引起润滑是否能有效缓解男性导尿过程中的疼痛。方法:这项前瞻性、多中心、双盲研究纳入190例预定行导尿术的男性患者。将患者随机分为四组:A组:用石蜡润滑导管;B组:用复方利多卡因凝胶润滑导管;C组:泵内连续注入灭菌水;D组:泵内持续输注2%利多卡因。主要结果为视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分。采用统计分析系统SAS (version 9.4)进行统计分析。结果:D组VAS最低(18.90±11.44),C组次之(33.00±11.07),A组VAS最高(53.98±14.76)。结论:置管过程中持续输注灭菌水是一种有效的润滑尿道粘膜的方法;此外,输注2%利多卡因提供更好的镇痛和润滑。试验注册:研究方案已于2023年4月25日在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2300070866) (https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=194591)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Mortality and patient disposition after ICU tracheostomy for secretion management vs. prolonged ventilation: a retrospective cohort study. Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring. Opioid sparing anesthesia in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing liver resection: a controlled randomized double-blind study. "The effect of intramuscular dexmedetomidine versus oral gabapentin premedication on the emergence agitation after rhinoplasty". A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting perioperative transfusion in children undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1