Does paced bottle-feeding improve the quality and outcome of bottle-feeding interactions?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Early human development Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106181
Alison K. Ventura , Vivian M. Drewelow , Taylor N. Richardson
{"title":"Does paced bottle-feeding improve the quality and outcome of bottle-feeding interactions?","authors":"Alison K. Ventura ,&nbsp;Vivian M. Drewelow ,&nbsp;Taylor N. Richardson","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Responsive feeding is recommended and occurs when caregivers use infants' behavioral cues to guide the timing, pacing, and duration of feeding. Paced bottle-feeding is an approach designed to promote responsive bottle-feeding by mimicking the behavioral benefits of breastfeeding. This study evaluates the efficacy of paced bottle-feeding compared to typical bottle-feeding and breastfeeding for promoting responsive feeding and other markers of healthy feeding outcomes, such as slower feeding rates and lower likelihood of spitting up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This within-subject, experimental study involved 29 mothers and their typically developing full-term infants. Participants were observed during three feeding conditions: <em>Breastfeeding</em>, <em>Typical bottle-feeding</em>, and <em>Paced bottle-feeding</em>. Each feeding session was video-recorded and coded using the Nursing Child Assessment Caregiver-Child Interaction Feeding Scale. Outcome measures included maternal sensitivity to infant cues, infant clarity of cues, infant milk intake, meal duration, and feeding rate. Mixed linear models were used for data analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Maternal sensitivity to infant cues and infant clarity of cues were similar between paced bottle-feeding and typical bottle-feeding but lower than breastfeeding. Paced bottle-feeding led to significantly longer feeding durations and slower feeding rates than typical bottle-feeding, with no significant differences in milk intake. Infant clarity of cues moderated impacts of feeding condition on maternal sensitivity to infant cues; when infants exhibited lower clarity of cues, maternal sensitivity to infant cues was lowest during typical bottle-feeding compared to paced bottle-feeding and breastfeeding.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Paced bottle-feeding effectively slowed feeding rates and extended meal durations. Paced bottle-feeding was also associated with greater maternal sensitivity to infant cues compared to typical bottle-feeding when infants had lower clarity of cues. These findings provide preliminary evidence of the potential for paced bottle-feeding to promote responsive feeding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 106181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224002500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Responsive feeding is recommended and occurs when caregivers use infants' behavioral cues to guide the timing, pacing, and duration of feeding. Paced bottle-feeding is an approach designed to promote responsive bottle-feeding by mimicking the behavioral benefits of breastfeeding. This study evaluates the efficacy of paced bottle-feeding compared to typical bottle-feeding and breastfeeding for promoting responsive feeding and other markers of healthy feeding outcomes, such as slower feeding rates and lower likelihood of spitting up.

Methods

This within-subject, experimental study involved 29 mothers and their typically developing full-term infants. Participants were observed during three feeding conditions: Breastfeeding, Typical bottle-feeding, and Paced bottle-feeding. Each feeding session was video-recorded and coded using the Nursing Child Assessment Caregiver-Child Interaction Feeding Scale. Outcome measures included maternal sensitivity to infant cues, infant clarity of cues, infant milk intake, meal duration, and feeding rate. Mixed linear models were used for data analysis.

Results

Maternal sensitivity to infant cues and infant clarity of cues were similar between paced bottle-feeding and typical bottle-feeding but lower than breastfeeding. Paced bottle-feeding led to significantly longer feeding durations and slower feeding rates than typical bottle-feeding, with no significant differences in milk intake. Infant clarity of cues moderated impacts of feeding condition on maternal sensitivity to infant cues; when infants exhibited lower clarity of cues, maternal sensitivity to infant cues was lowest during typical bottle-feeding compared to paced bottle-feeding and breastfeeding.

Conclusions

Paced bottle-feeding effectively slowed feeding rates and extended meal durations. Paced bottle-feeding was also associated with greater maternal sensitivity to infant cues compared to typical bottle-feeding when infants had lower clarity of cues. These findings provide preliminary evidence of the potential for paced bottle-feeding to promote responsive feeding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有节奏的奶瓶喂养是否改善了奶瓶喂养互动的质量和结果?
背景:反应性喂养是推荐的,当照顾者使用婴儿的行为线索来指导喂养的时间、节奏和持续时间时,就会发生反应性喂养。节奏奶瓶喂养是一种旨在通过模仿母乳喂养的行为益处来促进反应性奶瓶喂养的方法。本研究评估了与典型的奶瓶喂养和母乳喂养相比,有节奏的奶瓶喂养在促进反应性喂养和其他健康喂养结果标志(如较慢的喂养速度和较低的吐痰可能性)方面的功效。方法:本课题内的实验研究涉及29位母亲及其典型发育的足月婴儿。参与者在三种喂养条件下观察:母乳喂养,典型的奶瓶喂养和有节奏的奶瓶喂养。每次喂养过程都被录像,并使用护理儿童评估护理者-儿童互动喂养量表进行编码。结果测量包括母亲对婴儿线索的敏感性,婴儿对线索的清晰度,婴儿牛奶摄入量,用餐时间和喂养率。采用混合线性模型进行数据分析。结果:母亲对婴儿线索的敏感性和婴儿对线索的清晰度在节奏奶瓶喂养和典型奶瓶喂养之间相似,但低于母乳喂养。与典型的奶瓶喂养相比,有节奏的奶瓶喂养导致喂养持续时间更长,喂养速度更慢,而牛奶摄入量没有显著差异。婴儿线索清晰度调节喂养条件对母亲对婴儿线索敏感性的影响;当婴儿表现出较低的线索清晰度时,与有节奏的奶瓶喂养和母乳喂养相比,在典型的奶瓶喂养期间,母亲对婴儿线索的敏感性最低。结论:有节奏的奶瓶喂养有效地减缓了喂养速度,延长了进餐时间。与典型的奶瓶喂养相比,当婴儿对线索的清晰度较低时,有节奏的奶瓶喂养也与母亲对婴儿线索的敏感度更高有关。这些发现为有节奏的奶瓶喂养可能促进反应性喂养提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
期刊最新文献
Clinical validation of an abridged AIMS: Streamlining motor screening in the first-year infant Early postnatal transitional circulation in fetal growth restricted neonates Longitudinal outcomes of a parent-administered sensorimotor intervention in preterm infants at 4 and 18 months Placental inflammatory response and association with the severity of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy Does paced bottle-feeding improve the quality and outcome of bottle-feeding interactions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1