Evaluation of zirconia implants in fibula and deep circumflex iliac artery flaps: a prospective 1.5-year follow-up study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-06092-5
Kristian Kniha, Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich, Florian Peters, Marius Heitzer, Philipp Winnand, Anna Bock, Frank Hölzle, Ali Modabber
{"title":"Evaluation of zirconia implants in fibula and deep circumflex iliac artery flaps: a prospective 1.5-year follow-up study.","authors":"Kristian Kniha, Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich, Florian Peters, Marius Heitzer, Philipp Winnand, Anna Bock, Frank Hölzle, Ali Modabber","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06092-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Follow-up results of modern zirconia implants inserted in fibula free and deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) flaps with fixed dentures are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate crestal bone changes and the survival rate of zirconia implants for up to 1.5 years of prospective follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten patients with six fibula and four DCIA flaps underwent reconstruction in the lower and upper jaws using vascularized composite flaps and were treated with zirconia implants. Peri-implant bone resorption was measured using radiographic images that were taken immediately after implant surgery (T1) and after three (T2), 12 (T3), and 18 months (T4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between the day of operation and T3, a significant increase in distance was recorded for the fibula flaps. After occlusal loading (T2) of 41 zirconia implants for up to 1.5 years, no significant bone loss in each flap was observed overall. An overall survival rate of 96.56% was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When comparing both composite flaps, no significant difference in periimplant bone levels was measured between the same timepoints.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>For fixed dentures, modern zirconia implants can be used in the DCIA and fibula flaps, however further long-term data is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06092-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Follow-up results of modern zirconia implants inserted in fibula free and deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) flaps with fixed dentures are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate crestal bone changes and the survival rate of zirconia implants for up to 1.5 years of prospective follow-up.

Materials and methods: Ten patients with six fibula and four DCIA flaps underwent reconstruction in the lower and upper jaws using vascularized composite flaps and were treated with zirconia implants. Peri-implant bone resorption was measured using radiographic images that were taken immediately after implant surgery (T1) and after three (T2), 12 (T3), and 18 months (T4).

Results: Between the day of operation and T3, a significant increase in distance was recorded for the fibula flaps. After occlusal loading (T2) of 41 zirconia implants for up to 1.5 years, no significant bone loss in each flap was observed overall. An overall survival rate of 96.56% was reported.

Conclusions: When comparing both composite flaps, no significant difference in periimplant bone levels was measured between the same timepoints.

Clinical relevance: For fixed dentures, modern zirconia implants can be used in the DCIA and fibula flaps, however further long-term data is necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价氧化锆植入腓骨和旋髂深动脉皮瓣:一项为期1.5年的前瞻性随访研究。
目的:现代氧化锆种植体植入游离腓骨及旋髂深动脉(DCIA)皮瓣并固定义齿的随访结果尚少。本研究旨在评估牙冠骨的变化和氧化锆种植体长达1.5年的前瞻性随访存活率。材料与方法:10例6块腓骨和4块DCIA皮瓣采用带血管的复合皮瓣在上下颌骨重建,并用氧化锆种植体治疗。采用种植术后即刻(T1)、3个月(T2)、12个月(T3)和18个月(T4)拍摄的x线片测量种植体周围骨吸收。结果:从手术当天到T3,腓骨皮瓣的距离明显增加。在咬合加载(T2) 41个氧化锆种植体长达1.5年之后,总体上没有观察到每个皮瓣明显的骨丢失。总生存率为96.56%。结论:当比较两种复合皮瓣时,在同一时间点测量种植周骨水平无显著差异。临床意义:对于固定义齿,现代氧化锆种植体可用于DCIA和腓骨皮瓣,但需要进一步的长期数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
期刊最新文献
Orthonasal bioactive volatiles and their effects on salivation: a pilot study. Postoperative pain and quality of life after the use of different endodontic sealers in asymptomatic molars: a randomized clinical trial. A novel classification of periodontal phenotype integrating hard and soft tissue parameters using data-driven clustering. Impact of postoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on survival outcomes in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients with pN1 neck disease. Association of anterior crossbite and open bite with the number of remaining teeth: A cross-sectional study from the Tohoku medical megabank cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1