Optimizing Individualized Antimicrobial Dosing in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1007/s40261-024-01415-6
Nadir Yalçın, Yağmur Dirik, İzgi Bayraktar, Mutlu Umaroğlu, Karel Allegaert
{"title":"Optimizing Individualized Antimicrobial Dosing in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Nadir Yalçın, Yağmur Dirik, İzgi Bayraktar, Mutlu Umaroğlu, Karel Allegaert","doi":"10.1007/s40261-024-01415-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and target concentration intervention (TCI) represent significant advancements in individualized medicine, aiming to tailor dosages based on patient-specific characteristics. These approaches account for intra- and inter-individual physiological and clinical variability, with the goal of improving target attainment and clinical remission while reducing treatment failure and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective is to assess and enhance the current body of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have investigated alternative personalized dosing strategies, such as TDM and TCI, in terms of their efficacy and safety for individualized antimicrobial dosing in pediatric populations. Only studies that compared different dosing regimens and reported plasma concentrations were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until January 3rd, 2024. Only published, peer-reviewed RCTs were considered for inclusion. The study focused on human subjects aged < 18 years who were receiving an antimicrobial drug. The interventions compared experimental dosing versus standard dosing with TDM or TCI. The risk of bias was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The primary outcome was the attainment of target concentrations, while secondary outcomes included adverse effects, clinical remission, and treatment failure. Data synthesis was performed using the restricted maximum likelihood method, and the risk ratio (RR) was used as the measure of effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 11 TDM-based RCTs were included in the study [experimental vs standard doses: 592 (51.3%) patients vs 563 (48.7%) patients]. Experimental dose was significantly associated with improvement in target attainment (RR 1.2587, OR 1.0717-1.4786; p = 0.0051). However, experimental antimicrobial dose optimization was non-significantly associated with a numerical decrease in treatment failure (RR 0.8966, OR 0.7749-1.0374; p = 0.1424). In addition, it was not significant associated with higher adverse effects [RR 1.3408, odds ratio (OR) 0.1783-10.0825; p = 0.7757] and clinical remission rates (RR 4.0589, OR 0.2494-66.0558; p = 0.3250).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis showed that only target attainment using TDM was significantly improved in pediatric patients treated with experimental doses of antimicrobials compared to standard doses. Larger TCI-focused RCTs are needed to significantly improve treatment failure, adverse effects, and clinical remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01415-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and target concentration intervention (TCI) represent significant advancements in individualized medicine, aiming to tailor dosages based on patient-specific characteristics. These approaches account for intra- and inter-individual physiological and clinical variability, with the goal of improving target attainment and clinical remission while reducing treatment failure and adverse effects.

Objectives: The objective is to assess and enhance the current body of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have investigated alternative personalized dosing strategies, such as TDM and TCI, in terms of their efficacy and safety for individualized antimicrobial dosing in pediatric populations. Only studies that compared different dosing regimens and reported plasma concentrations were included in the analysis.

Methods: Databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until January 3rd, 2024. Only published, peer-reviewed RCTs were considered for inclusion. The study focused on human subjects aged < 18 years who were receiving an antimicrobial drug. The interventions compared experimental dosing versus standard dosing with TDM or TCI. The risk of bias was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The primary outcome was the attainment of target concentrations, while secondary outcomes included adverse effects, clinical remission, and treatment failure. Data synthesis was performed using the restricted maximum likelihood method, and the risk ratio (RR) was used as the measure of effect size.

Results: Only 11 TDM-based RCTs were included in the study [experimental vs standard doses: 592 (51.3%) patients vs 563 (48.7%) patients]. Experimental dose was significantly associated with improvement in target attainment (RR 1.2587, OR 1.0717-1.4786; p = 0.0051). However, experimental antimicrobial dose optimization was non-significantly associated with a numerical decrease in treatment failure (RR 0.8966, OR 0.7749-1.0374; p = 0.1424). In addition, it was not significant associated with higher adverse effects [RR 1.3408, odds ratio (OR) 0.1783-10.0825; p = 0.7757] and clinical remission rates (RR 4.0589, OR 0.2494-66.0558; p = 0.3250).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that only target attainment using TDM was significantly improved in pediatric patients treated with experimental doses of antimicrobials compared to standard doses. Larger TCI-focused RCTs are needed to significantly improve treatment failure, adverse effects, and clinical remission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化儿科患者个体化抗菌药物剂量:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:治疗性药物监测(TDM)和靶浓度干预(TCI)代表了个体化医学的重大进步,旨在根据患者的具体特征定制剂量。这些方法解释了个体内部和个体之间的生理和临床变异性,目的是提高目标的实现和临床缓解,同时减少治疗失败和不良反应。目的:目的是评估和加强目前的随机对照试验(RCTs),这些试验研究了TDM和TCI等替代个性化给药策略在儿科人群中个体化抗菌药物给药的有效性和安全性。只有比较不同给药方案和报告的血浆浓度的研究才被纳入分析。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials等数据库至2024年1月3日。只考虑已发表的同行评议的随机对照试验。该研究的重点是接受抗菌药物治疗的年龄小于18岁的人类受试者。干预措施比较了TDM或TCI的实验剂量与标准剂量。使用Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具第2版评估偏倚风险。主要结局是达到目标浓度,次要结局包括不良反应、临床缓解和治疗失败。采用限制最大似然法进行数据综合,采用风险比(RR)作为效应大小的度量。结果:该研究仅纳入了11项基于tdm的rct[实验剂量vs标准剂量:592例(51.3%)患者vs 563例(48.7%)患者]。实验剂量与目标达成的改善显著相关(RR 1.2587, OR 1.0717-1.4786;p = 0.0051)。然而,实验抗菌剂量优化与治疗失败的数值降低无显著相关(RR 0.8966, OR 0.7749-1.0374;p = 0.1424)。此外,与较高的不良反应无显著相关性[RR 1.3408,比值比(OR) 0.1783-10.0825;p = 0.7757]和临床缓解率(RR 4.0589, OR 0.2494-66.0558;p = 0.3250)。结论:本荟萃分析显示,与标准剂量相比,使用实验剂量抗微生物药物治疗的儿科患者只有使用TDM的目标实现得到显著改善。需要更大的以tci为重点的随机对照试验来显著改善治疗失败、不良反应和临床缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Anti-obesity Agent, S-309309, in Healthy Adults with or Without Obesity. Evaluating the Real-World Safety of Icosapent Ethyl Versus Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid in Nationwide US Veterans Cohort: Examining Atrial Fibrillation and Bleeding Endpoints. The Cost-Effectiveness of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Treating HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in the USA: When Non-medication Expenses are Considered. Evaluation of NUN-004, a Novel Engineered Ephrin Antagonist, in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Phase I/Ib, Open-Label, Escalating Dose and Extended Access Study. Phenotypes of Patients with Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Underdosing in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from the ARENA Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1