Evaluating the value and risks of psychedelics for psychiatric medicine: a clinical perspective.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1080/14737175.2024.2445016
Donatella Marazziti, Francesco Weiss, Riccardo Gurrieri, Gerardo Russomanno, Matteo Gambini, Anna Magnesa, Andrea Coccoglioniti, Giulio Perugi
{"title":"Evaluating the value and risks of psychedelics for psychiatric medicine: a clinical perspective.","authors":"Donatella Marazziti, Francesco Weiss, Riccardo Gurrieri, Gerardo Russomanno, Matteo Gambini, Anna Magnesa, Andrea Coccoglioniti, Giulio Perugi","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2445016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>After a long period of obscurantism, a possible role of psychedelics in clinical practice has progressively become a tangible perspective during the last two decades. However, the resounding enthusiasm linked to such 'psychedelic renaissance' runs the risk to unduly minimize the possible hazards associated with these compounds, while expanding their alleged benefits to improbable panacea-like proportions. In order to avoid mystifying or demonizing the properties of 5-HT2a agonists on emotional grounds, this subject requires a strictly unprejudiced and cautious approach to the evidence.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this article, the authors attempted to comprehensively analyze the available literature to provide a balanced overview of the possible benefits of psychedelics in healthcare, taking into account their potential risks.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>To date, psychedelics have shown a therapeutic potential in a wide range of conditions, with a seemingly limited risk of inducing adverse reactions, including abuse and dependence, when administered in a controlled environment by specialized personnel. In any case, although several questions remain unanswered before drawing firm conclusions, further studies are needed to establish which conditions and subjects could benefit from psychedelics and which patients bear the greater risk of adversities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2445016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: After a long period of obscurantism, a possible role of psychedelics in clinical practice has progressively become a tangible perspective during the last two decades. However, the resounding enthusiasm linked to such 'psychedelic renaissance' runs the risk to unduly minimize the possible hazards associated with these compounds, while expanding their alleged benefits to improbable panacea-like proportions. In order to avoid mystifying or demonizing the properties of 5-HT2a agonists on emotional grounds, this subject requires a strictly unprejudiced and cautious approach to the evidence.

Areas covered: In this article, the authors attempted to comprehensively analyze the available literature to provide a balanced overview of the possible benefits of psychedelics in healthcare, taking into account their potential risks.

Expert opinion: To date, psychedelics have shown a therapeutic potential in a wide range of conditions, with a seemingly limited risk of inducing adverse reactions, including abuse and dependence, when administered in a controlled environment by specialized personnel. In any case, although several questions remain unanswered before drawing firm conclusions, further studies are needed to establish which conditions and subjects could benefit from psychedelics and which patients bear the greater risk of adversities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估致幻剂对精神医学的价值和风险:临床观点。
导言:经过长时间的蒙昧主义,在过去的二十年中,迷幻药在临床实践中的可能作用逐渐成为一个切实的观点。然而,对这种“迷幻剂复兴”的热烈追捧有一种风险,即过度低估了与这些化合物相关的可能危害,同时将它们所谓的益处扩大到不可思议的万灵药般的程度。为了避免情绪化地神秘化或妖魔化5-HT2a激动剂的特性,这一主题要求对证据采取严格的无偏见和谨慎的态度。涵盖领域:在本文中,作者试图全面分析现有文献,在考虑到致幻剂潜在风险的情况下,对致幻剂在医疗保健领域可能带来的益处提供一个平衡的概述。专家意见:迄今为止,致幻剂已在广泛的条件下显示出治疗潜力,当由专业人员在受控环境中给药时,诱导不良反应(包括滥用和依赖)的风险似乎有限。无论如何,尽管在得出确切结论之前仍有几个问题没有得到解答,但需要进一步的研究来确定哪些条件和受试者可以从迷幻药中受益,哪些患者承受更大的逆境风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
期刊最新文献
An update on the treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis. The complexities in the differential diagnosis of restless legs syndrome (Willis-Ekbom disease). Therapeutic barriers for headache management: issues facing the global north and global south in 2024. Managing cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: an update of the literature. Managing sleep issues in Parkinson's disease: an up-to-date review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1