Oncologic Outcomes of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–Unresponsive Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Jacob Taylor , Ashish M. Kamat , Drupad Annapureddy , Zine-Eddine Khene , Jeffrey Howard , Wei Shen Tan , Ian M. McElree , Davaro Facundo , Kendrick Yim , Stephen Harrington , Elizabeth Dyer , Anna J. Black , Pratik Kanabur , Mathieu Roumiguié , Seth Lerner , Peter C. Black , Jay D. Raman , Mark Preston , Gary Steinberg , William Huang , Michael A. O’Donnell
{"title":"Oncologic Outcomes of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel Compared with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–Unresponsive Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer","authors":"Jacob Taylor , Ashish M. Kamat , Drupad Annapureddy , Zine-Eddine Khene , Jeffrey Howard , Wei Shen Tan , Ian M. McElree , Davaro Facundo , Kendrick Yim , Stephen Harrington , Elizabeth Dyer , Anna J. Black , Pratik Kanabur , Mathieu Roumiguié , Seth Lerner , Peter C. Black , Jay D. Raman , Mark Preston , Gary Steinberg , William Huang , Michael A. O’Donnell","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–5.0, <em>p</em> = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.4, <em>p</em> = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–12.3, <em>p</em>=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 469-476"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588931124002888","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective
Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) may become unresponsive to BCG. Recently, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/doce) are being used for NMIBC. This study aims to compare oncologic outcomes between sequential intravesical gem/doce versus additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.
Methods
Data were collected from ten academic institutions on patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC based on the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Information on high-grade recurrence-free (HGRFS), progression-free (PFS), cystectomy-free (CFS), metastasis-free (MFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival was collected. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to determine differences in oncologic outcomes between the Gem/Doce and BCG groups.
Key findings and limitations
Of 299 total patients, 204 underwent additional BCG treatment at the time of BCG unresponsiveness and 95 underwent gem/doce treatment. Rates of PFS (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–5.0, p = 0.03), CFS (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.4, p = 0.01), and CSS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–12.3, p=0.03) were higher in patients receiving gem/doce. HGRFS, MFS, and OS were similar between both groups.
Conclusions and clinical implications
The findings from this study suggest that intravesical gem/doce is associated with lower rates of progression than additional BCG in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC who decline or are ineligible for cystectomy.
Patient summary
In this report, we looked at outcomes between patients with noninvasive bladder cancer who were treated with additional bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or gemcitabine-docetaxel combination after not responding to primary BCG therapy. We found that intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel was associated with fewer progression events than additional salvage BCG therapy.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format