Investigating the effects of pressure support ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure during extubation on respiratory system complications.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Perioperative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s13741-024-00477-6
Ali Rıza Ata, Dilek Çetinkaya, Ferda Yaman
{"title":"Investigating the effects of pressure support ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure during extubation on respiratory system complications.","authors":"Ali Rıza Ata, Dilek Çetinkaya, Ferda Yaman","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00477-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative extubation is a critical phase. Various medications and different ventilation modes are employed during extubation to minimize potential issues. This study aimed to observe the early effects of the concurrent use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) modes during the extubation-emerge period on the respiratory system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients were administered a remifentanil infusion following the cessation of inhalation agents. PSV and PEEP modes were used on the mechanical ventilator, and the patients were extubated upon awakening. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, as well as complications during intraoperative and extubation periods, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 199 patients were evaluated. Patients with complications were defined as group I (n = 37), and those without complications as group 0 (n = 167). Post-extubation complications included cough (3 or more, persistent or repetitive coughing) in 12 patients (6.04%), desaturation (SPO2 < 90% for 10 s) in nine patients (4.53%), bronchospasm in eight patients (4.02%), agitation (5 and above on the agitation scale) in three patients (1.5%), need for rescue mask ventilation (SPO2 < 90% lasting longer than 10 s) in three patients (1.5%), and airway obstruction (2 and above according to laryngospasm score) in two patients (1%). Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for ASA III (p = 0.0365).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of PSV and PEEP modes during extubation-emergence period in laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in a low rate of respiratory system complications, which are mostly minor. These modes can be safely used during the extubation phase. However, since these complications are seen in patients with high ASA physical scores, further studies are needed for these patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06356649.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00477-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative extubation is a critical phase. Various medications and different ventilation modes are employed during extubation to minimize potential issues. This study aimed to observe the early effects of the concurrent use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) modes during the extubation-emerge period on the respiratory system.

Methods: After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients were administered a remifentanil infusion following the cessation of inhalation agents. PSV and PEEP modes were used on the mechanical ventilator, and the patients were extubated upon awakening. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, as well as complications during intraoperative and extubation periods, were recorded.

Results: A total of 199 patients were evaluated. Patients with complications were defined as group I (n = 37), and those without complications as group 0 (n = 167). Post-extubation complications included cough (3 or more, persistent or repetitive coughing) in 12 patients (6.04%), desaturation (SPO2 < 90% for 10 s) in nine patients (4.53%), bronchospasm in eight patients (4.02%), agitation (5 and above on the agitation scale) in three patients (1.5%), need for rescue mask ventilation (SPO2 < 90% lasting longer than 10 s) in three patients (1.5%), and airway obstruction (2 and above according to laryngospasm score) in two patients (1%). Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for ASA III (p = 0.0365).

Conclusions: The use of PSV and PEEP modes during extubation-emergence period in laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in a low rate of respiratory system complications, which are mostly minor. These modes can be safely used during the extubation phase. However, since these complications are seen in patients with high ASA physical scores, further studies are needed for these patients.

Trial registration: NCT06356649.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: a bibliometric analysis. The relationship between preoperative anemia and length of hospital stay among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery at a teaching hospital in Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. Excess hospital length of stay and extra cost attributable to primary prolonged postoperative ileus in open alimentary tract surgery: a multicenter cohort analysis in China. Investigating the effects of pressure support ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure during extubation on respiratory system complications. The current situation and associated factors of preoperative frailty in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1