Automated Measurement of Strabismus Angle Using a Commercial Virtual Reality Headset.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2466-0284
Rino Vicini, Dominik Brügger, Hilary Grabe, Mathias Abegg
{"title":"Automated Measurement of Strabismus Angle Using a Commercial Virtual Reality Headset.","authors":"Rino Vicini, Dominik Brügger, Hilary Grabe, Mathias Abegg","doi":"10.1055/a-2466-0284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current clinical measurements of strabismus angles (SAs) are manual and require a skilled examiner and active cooperation by patients. This results in high interexaminer variability, and clinical use is limited by the availability of trained examiners. An objective and automated procedure, independent of the examiner, would be useful. This single-center, prospective, diagnostic feasibility study compared the vertical and horizontal SA of patients, as measured with a commercially available virtual reality headset (VRH) and custom software with the gold standard measurements performed manually with the Harms tangent screen (HW) and the alternate prism cover test (ACT). We implemented the ACT by showing the patient a fixation target on each eye alternatively with the VRH while recording the eye position of the patient. We then processed the data with custom written software to calculate the SA of the patients. These measurements were then compared to the SA measured with HW and the clinical ACT. Thirty-three patients took part in our study. We found good correlation between the VRH method and the HW as well as the clinical ACT. Best correlation was found for horizontal SA in the primary position, with the vertical SA in the primary position also correlating well. Peripheral gaze resulted in a slightly lower correlation due to the overestimation of horizontal SA and underestimation of vertical SA; cyclorotation was not measured with the VRH. Overall, VRH, HW, and clinical ACT correlated similarly well as the published interexaminer correlation for ACT. The automated measurement of strabismus with a VRH is feasible, easily applicable, fast, accurate, and can be run on consumer hardware that is affordable and increasingly available.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2466-0284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current clinical measurements of strabismus angles (SAs) are manual and require a skilled examiner and active cooperation by patients. This results in high interexaminer variability, and clinical use is limited by the availability of trained examiners. An objective and automated procedure, independent of the examiner, would be useful. This single-center, prospective, diagnostic feasibility study compared the vertical and horizontal SA of patients, as measured with a commercially available virtual reality headset (VRH) and custom software with the gold standard measurements performed manually with the Harms tangent screen (HW) and the alternate prism cover test (ACT). We implemented the ACT by showing the patient a fixation target on each eye alternatively with the VRH while recording the eye position of the patient. We then processed the data with custom written software to calculate the SA of the patients. These measurements were then compared to the SA measured with HW and the clinical ACT. Thirty-three patients took part in our study. We found good correlation between the VRH method and the HW as well as the clinical ACT. Best correlation was found for horizontal SA in the primary position, with the vertical SA in the primary position also correlating well. Peripheral gaze resulted in a slightly lower correlation due to the overestimation of horizontal SA and underestimation of vertical SA; cyclorotation was not measured with the VRH. Overall, VRH, HW, and clinical ACT correlated similarly well as the published interexaminer correlation for ACT. The automated measurement of strabismus with a VRH is feasible, easily applicable, fast, accurate, and can be run on consumer hardware that is affordable and increasingly available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
期刊最新文献
Histopathological Findings of Epithelial Invasion after Arcuate and Radial Keratotomies. Automated Measurement of Strabismus Angle Using a Commercial Virtual Reality Headset. Evaluation of Reproducibility of Measurements of Peripapillary Blood Flow with Laser Speckle Flowgraphy in Healthy and POAG Subjects. Standardized Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Congenital Aniridia. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Measurements from Two Swept-Source OCT Devices: Eyestar 900 vs. Anterion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1