Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI helps in differentiating double-expressor from non-double-expressor subtypes in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1007/s00234-024-03511-y
Goh Sasaki, Hiroyuki Uetani, Jun-Ichiro Kuroda, Mika Kitajima, Soichiro Ishiuchi, Kanako Sato, Yi Wang, Akitake Mukasa, Toshinori Hirai
{"title":"Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI helps in differentiating double-expressor from non-double-expressor subtypes in primary central nervous system lymphoma.","authors":"Goh Sasaki, Hiroyuki Uetani, Jun-Ichiro Kuroda, Mika Kitajima, Soichiro Ishiuchi, Kanako Sato, Yi Wang, Akitake Mukasa, Toshinori Hirai","doi":"10.1007/s00234-024-03511-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the 2016 WHO Classification of Lymphoid Tissue Neoplasms, co-expression of MYC and BCL2 is newly designated as double expressor lymphoma. Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma with double expressor (DE-PCNSL) have been reported to have a higher risk of recurrence and a worse prognosis than those with PCNSL without double expressor (non-DE-PCNSL). The aim of this study was to determine whether DE-PCNSL has characteristic clinical and MR imaging features compared to non-DE-PCNSL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 36 immunocompetent patients with PCNSL, including 16 with double expressor and 20 without double expressor. The enhancement pattern and the values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), leakage-corrected rCBV, and K2 at enhancing lesions were compared between the DE-PCNSL and non-DE-PCNSL groups. The mean and minimum values from the ROI on ADC maps were designated as ADC<sub>mean</sub> and ADC<sub>min</sub>, respectively. The data of rCBV, leakage-corrected rCBV and K2 were obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DE-PCNSL was significantly more common in women (12 of 16 patients, 75%) compared to non-DE-PCNSL (7 of 20 patients, 35%; P =.02). The rCBV ratio and leakage-corrected rCBV ratio were significantly lower in DE-PCNSL compared to non-DE-PCNSL (P =.02 and P =.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in the enhancement pattern and ADC<sub>mean</sub>, ADC<sub>min</sub> and K2 values between the two groups. DE-PCNSL tended to have a shorter PFS than non-DE-PCNSL, although the difference was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rCBV and leakage-corrected rCBV may help differentiate double-expressor from non-double-expressor subtypes in PCNSL.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03511-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In the 2016 WHO Classification of Lymphoid Tissue Neoplasms, co-expression of MYC and BCL2 is newly designated as double expressor lymphoma. Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma with double expressor (DE-PCNSL) have been reported to have a higher risk of recurrence and a worse prognosis than those with PCNSL without double expressor (non-DE-PCNSL). The aim of this study was to determine whether DE-PCNSL has characteristic clinical and MR imaging features compared to non-DE-PCNSL.

Methods: This study included 36 immunocompetent patients with PCNSL, including 16 with double expressor and 20 without double expressor. The enhancement pattern and the values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), leakage-corrected rCBV, and K2 at enhancing lesions were compared between the DE-PCNSL and non-DE-PCNSL groups. The mean and minimum values from the ROI on ADC maps were designated as ADCmean and ADCmin, respectively. The data of rCBV, leakage-corrected rCBV and K2 were obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) differences.

Results: DE-PCNSL was significantly more common in women (12 of 16 patients, 75%) compared to non-DE-PCNSL (7 of 20 patients, 35%; P =.02). The rCBV ratio and leakage-corrected rCBV ratio were significantly lower in DE-PCNSL compared to non-DE-PCNSL (P =.02 and P =.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in the enhancement pattern and ADCmean, ADCmin and K2 values between the two groups. DE-PCNSL tended to have a shorter PFS than non-DE-PCNSL, although the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: rCBV and leakage-corrected rCBV may help differentiate double-expressor from non-double-expressor subtypes in PCNSL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态敏感性对比灌注MRI有助于鉴别原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的双表达亚型和非双表达亚型。
目的:在2016年WHO淋巴组织肿瘤分类中,MYC和BCL2共同表达被新定义为双表达淋巴瘤。据报道,原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤双表达者(DE-PCNSL)患者比无双表达者(non-DE-PCNSL)具有更高的复发风险和更差的预后。本研究的目的是确定与非DE-PCNSL相比,DE-PCNSL是否具有特征性的临床和MR成像特征。方法:本研究纳入36例免疫功能正常的PCNSL患者,其中双表达者16例,无双表达者20例。比较DE-PCNSL组与非DE-PCNSL组增强模式及增强病灶处表观扩散系数(ADC)、相对脑血容量(rCBV)、漏校正rCBV、K2值。将ROI在ADC图上的平均值和最小值分别命名为ADCmean和ADCmin。rCBV、漏校正rCBV和K2数据通过动态敏感性对比(DSC)灌注MRI获得。Kaplan-Meier法用于估计无进展生存期(PFS)差异。结果:DE-PCNSL在女性中(16例患者中有12例,75%)明显高于非DE-PCNSL(20例患者中有7例,35%;P = .02点)。与非DE-PCNSL相比,DE-PCNSL的rCBV比率和泄漏校正的rCBV比率显著降低(P =。和P =。分别为03)。两组间增强模式及ADCmean、ADCmin、K2值均无显著差异。DE-PCNSL患者的PFS较非DE-PCNSL患者短,但差异不显著。结论:rCBV和漏校正rCBV可能有助于区分PCNSL的双表达亚型和非双表达亚型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
期刊最新文献
A rare presentation of acute onset metronidazole-induced leukoencephalopathy with rapid resolution: a case report. Local artery geometry characteristics associated with middle cerebral atherosclerotic stenosis. Eighteen-year journey in endovascular management of cavernous sinus DAVFs: advances, outcomes, and lessons learned. Recurrence patterns in pediatric intracranial ependymal neoplasm: a systematic imaging work-up. White matter injuries mediate brain age effects on cognitive function in cerebral small vessel disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1