Barriers to advancing the sexual and reproductive health agenda in Latin America: a qualitative study of key informants' perspectives.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s12978-024-01927-6
Juan Pedro Alonso, Cintia Cejas, Mabel Berrueta, Paula Vazquez, Gabriela Perrotta, Sandra Formia, Sofía Pirsch, Jamile Ballivian, Denise Zavala, Analía López, María Belizán
{"title":"Barriers to advancing the sexual and reproductive health agenda in Latin America: a qualitative study of key informants' perspectives.","authors":"Juan Pedro Alonso, Cintia Cejas, Mabel Berrueta, Paula Vazquez, Gabriela Perrotta, Sandra Formia, Sofía Pirsch, Jamile Ballivian, Denise Zavala, Analía López, María Belizán","doi":"10.1186/s12978-024-01927-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effective attainment of sexual, reproductive, and maternal health and rights (SRMHR) requires a holistic life-course approach. This approach should address disparities in healthcare access and rights, guarantee the delivery of high-quality care devoid of discrimination, and underscore rigorous accountability mechanisms throughout the implementation process. Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries face significant disparities in SRMHR within and between nations. Vulnerable populations, such as indigenous communities, Afro-descendants, LGBTQI + population, persons with disabilities, older adults, and migrants, often endure discrimination and stigmatization, severely impacting their access to healthcare and health rights. This paper presents the findings from the qualitative component of a broader mixed-methods scoping study aimed at establishing a priority research agenda to address healthcare gaps affecting the SRMHR of vulnerable populations. The qualitative component focused on identifying key challenges hindering progress in SRMHR and access to health services for these populations in the LAC region, drawing on the perspectives of key informants at both regional and national levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative research approach employing semi-structured interviews with key informants. A purposive sample comprised of stakeholders from relevant regional organizations and local stakeholders in selected countries (Argentina, Colombia, Peru, Mexico, Guatemala, Jamaica, and Guyana), encompassing government representatives, civil organizations, and academia. A rapid content thematic analysis was conducted to analyze the data obtained from the interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 27 key informants in SRMHR, six at a regional level and 21 at a country level. The region faces barriers around establishing and sustaining agency agendas, such as a lack of political will, political instability, and opposition from civil society groups regarding SRMHR agendas. Policy implementation presents difficulties due to insufficient and unstable funding, weaknesses in sexual and reproductive health programs, unequal policy implementation in federal countries, and the absence of evidence-based policies. The lack of high-quality data and quality indicators poses obstacles, leading to limitations in evidence generation. Access to SRMHR services faces barriers such as the low-quality provision of services, discrepancies between legislation and effective access, insufficient healthcare resources, and resistance from certain healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing these multifaceted challenges will be crucial in advancing the agenda of sexual, reproductive, and maternal health rights and ensuring effective access to health services for the most vulnerable populations in the LAC region.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01927-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effective attainment of sexual, reproductive, and maternal health and rights (SRMHR) requires a holistic life-course approach. This approach should address disparities in healthcare access and rights, guarantee the delivery of high-quality care devoid of discrimination, and underscore rigorous accountability mechanisms throughout the implementation process. Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries face significant disparities in SRMHR within and between nations. Vulnerable populations, such as indigenous communities, Afro-descendants, LGBTQI + population, persons with disabilities, older adults, and migrants, often endure discrimination and stigmatization, severely impacting their access to healthcare and health rights. This paper presents the findings from the qualitative component of a broader mixed-methods scoping study aimed at establishing a priority research agenda to address healthcare gaps affecting the SRMHR of vulnerable populations. The qualitative component focused on identifying key challenges hindering progress in SRMHR and access to health services for these populations in the LAC region, drawing on the perspectives of key informants at both regional and national levels.

Methods: Qualitative research approach employing semi-structured interviews with key informants. A purposive sample comprised of stakeholders from relevant regional organizations and local stakeholders in selected countries (Argentina, Colombia, Peru, Mexico, Guatemala, Jamaica, and Guyana), encompassing government representatives, civil organizations, and academia. A rapid content thematic analysis was conducted to analyze the data obtained from the interviews.

Results: We interviewed 27 key informants in SRMHR, six at a regional level and 21 at a country level. The region faces barriers around establishing and sustaining agency agendas, such as a lack of political will, political instability, and opposition from civil society groups regarding SRMHR agendas. Policy implementation presents difficulties due to insufficient and unstable funding, weaknesses in sexual and reproductive health programs, unequal policy implementation in federal countries, and the absence of evidence-based policies. The lack of high-quality data and quality indicators poses obstacles, leading to limitations in evidence generation. Access to SRMHR services faces barriers such as the low-quality provision of services, discrepancies between legislation and effective access, insufficient healthcare resources, and resistance from certain healthcare providers.

Conclusion: Addressing these multifaceted challenges will be crucial in advancing the agenda of sexual, reproductive, and maternal health rights and ensuring effective access to health services for the most vulnerable populations in the LAC region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在拉丁美洲推进性健康和生殖健康议程的障碍:对主要举报人观点的定性研究。
背景:有效实现性、生殖和孕产妇健康和权利(SRMHR)需要一种全面的生命历程方法。这一方针应解决保健机会和权利方面的差异,保证不受歧视地提供高质量护理,并在整个实施过程中强调严格的问责机制。拉丁美洲和加勒比(LAC)国家在国家内部和国家之间面临着严重的srrmhr差异。弱势群体,如土著社区、非洲裔、LGBTQI +人群、残疾人、老年人和移民,往往遭受歧视和污名化,严重影响了他们获得医疗保健和健康权利的机会。本文介绍了一项更广泛的混合方法范围界定研究的定性部分的研究结果,该研究旨在建立一个优先研究议程,以解决影响弱势群体SRMHR的医疗保健差距。定性部分的重点是根据区域和国家两级主要举报率的观点,确定阻碍拉美和加勒比区域这些人口获得卫生服务的关键挑战。方法:采用质性研究方法,采用半结构化访谈与关键线人。有目的的样本包括来自相关区域组织的利益相关者和选定国家(阿根廷、哥伦比亚、秘鲁、墨西哥、危地马拉、牙买加和圭亚那)的当地利益相关者,包括政府代表、民间组织和学术界。通过快速的内容专题分析来分析从访谈中获得的数据。结果:我们采访了SRMHR的27名关键线人,其中6名在区域层面,21名在国家层面。该地区在制定和维持机构议程方面面临障碍,例如缺乏政治意愿、政治不稳定以及民间社会团体对SRMHR议程的反对。由于资金不足和不稳定、性健康和生殖健康方案薄弱、联邦国家政策执行不平等以及缺乏循证政策,政策执行存在困难。缺乏高质量的数据和质量指标构成了障碍,导致证据生成受到限制。获得SRMHR服务面临一些障碍,如服务质量低、立法与有效获取之间存在差异、医疗资源不足以及某些医疗保健提供者的抵制。结论:应对这些多方面的挑战对于推进性健康、生殖健康和孕产妇健康权利议程以及确保拉丁美洲和加勒比地区最弱势群体有效获得保健服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Correlations among hope, fertility quality of life and negative emotions for couples undergoing their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a cross-sectional analysis. Trends and contributors of complete continuum of maternal healthcare service utilization in Ethiopia: a multivariate decomposition analyses. Designing and validating an adaptation tool for endometriosis: an exploratory mixed method study protocol. Infertility stigma and openness with others are related to depressive symptoms and meaning in life in men and women diagnosed with infertility. Fear of childbirth and psychiatric disorders decrease the likelihood of subsequent births: a retrospective register-based cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1