Antibiotic susceptibility and phenotypic profile of Staphylococcus species isolated from different clinical samples from health facilities: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241306968
Khanda Abdulateef Anwar, Shyar Mustafa Saadalla, Aran Jabar Muhammad Amin, Shad Mahdi Ahmed, Mina Kawa Qadir
{"title":"Antibiotic susceptibility and phenotypic profile of <i>Staphylococcus</i> species isolated from different clinical samples from health facilities: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Khanda Abdulateef Anwar, Shyar Mustafa Saadalla, Aran Jabar Muhammad Amin, Shad Mahdi Ahmed, Mina Kawa Qadir","doi":"10.1177/20503121241306968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Staphylococcus</i> species are widely distributed in nature and found in various human body sites.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of <i>Staphylococcus</i> species isolated from different clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 clinical specimens from conveniently sampled patients seeking healthcare at two health facilities in sulaimani / Iraq. Bacterial isolation and identification were done using conventional techniques, after which the antibiotic susceptibility profile of <i>Staphylococcus</i> species commonly prescribed antibiotics used in treating infections at the facilities was done using the disc diffusion method. Finally, <i>MecA</i>, methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and macrolides-lincosamide and streptogramin genes with mupirocin-resistant, beta-lactamase and vancomycin-resistance phenotypes were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was the prevalent isolated species (<i>n</i> = 197, 49.3%), followed by <i>Staphylococcus hemolyticus</i> (<i>n</i> = 115, 28.8%), <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> (<i>n</i> = 49, 12.3%), <i>Staphylococcus hominis</i> (<i>n</i> = 9.0, 2.3%), <i>Staphylococcus sciuri</i> (<i>n</i> = 8.0, 2.0%) and <i>Staphylococcus lentus</i> (<i>n</i> = 4.0, 1.0%). All isolated species resisted Penicillin G, Ampicillin, Cefotaxime and Cefoxitin. Most of the isolates, 89.5% (<i>n</i> = 358) had the beta-lactamase phenotype, 18.0% (<i>n</i> = 72) had the MecA gene, 2.8% (<i>n</i> = 11) the Mupirocin-resistant phenotype, and 2.0% (<i>n</i> = 8.0) the vancomycin-resistance phenotype. Additionally, 12 isolates had both methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (66.7%) and macrolides-lincosamide and streptogramin (65.2%) genes. The majority of the patients, 43% (<i>n</i> = 172) were >50 years old and 52.25% (<i>n</i> = 209) males. Also, most samples were from patients with urinary tract infection (<i>n</i> = 73), wound (<i>n</i> = 71), blood (<i>n</i> = 35), sputum (<i>n</i> = 29), pus (<i>n</i> = 28), seminal fluid (<i>n</i> = 27), cerebrospinal fluid (<i>n</i> = 1.0) and stool (<i>n</i> = 1.0). Most isolates that had the MSLb gene were highly significantly resistant to both Clindamycin (94.6%) and Erythromycin (84.7%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> was the predominant <i>Staphylococcus</i> species isolated from the clinical samples, most of which were resistant to most commonly prescribed antibiotics and had developed resistant genes and phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"20503121241306968"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241306968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus species are widely distributed in nature and found in various human body sites.

Objectives: To determine the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus species isolated from different clinical samples.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 clinical specimens from conveniently sampled patients seeking healthcare at two health facilities in sulaimani / Iraq. Bacterial isolation and identification were done using conventional techniques, after which the antibiotic susceptibility profile of Staphylococcus species commonly prescribed antibiotics used in treating infections at the facilities was done using the disc diffusion method. Finally, MecA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and macrolides-lincosamide and streptogramin genes with mupirocin-resistant, beta-lactamase and vancomycin-resistance phenotypes were identified.

Results: Staphylococcus aureus was the prevalent isolated species (n = 197, 49.3%), followed by Staphylococcus hemolyticus (n = 115, 28.8%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 49, 12.3%), Staphylococcus hominis (n = 9.0, 2.3%), Staphylococcus sciuri (n = 8.0, 2.0%) and Staphylococcus lentus (n = 4.0, 1.0%). All isolated species resisted Penicillin G, Ampicillin, Cefotaxime and Cefoxitin. Most of the isolates, 89.5% (n = 358) had the beta-lactamase phenotype, 18.0% (n = 72) had the MecA gene, 2.8% (n = 11) the Mupirocin-resistant phenotype, and 2.0% (n = 8.0) the vancomycin-resistance phenotype. Additionally, 12 isolates had both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (66.7%) and macrolides-lincosamide and streptogramin (65.2%) genes. The majority of the patients, 43% (n = 172) were >50 years old and 52.25% (n = 209) males. Also, most samples were from patients with urinary tract infection (n = 73), wound (n = 71), blood (n = 35), sputum (n = 29), pus (n = 28), seminal fluid (n = 27), cerebrospinal fluid (n = 1.0) and stool (n = 1.0). Most isolates that had the MSLb gene were highly significantly resistant to both Clindamycin (94.6%) and Erythromycin (84.7%) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant Staphylococcus species isolated from the clinical samples, most of which were resistant to most commonly prescribed antibiotics and had developed resistant genes and phenotypes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从卫生机构不同临床样本中分离的葡萄球菌物种的抗生素敏感性和表型特征:一项横断面研究。
背景:葡萄球菌广泛分布于自然界,存在于人体的各个部位。目的:探讨不同临床标本中葡萄球菌的药敏特征。方法:本横断面研究对来自苏莱曼尼/伊拉克两家卫生机构就诊的方便抽样患者的400例临床标本进行了研究。采用常规技术进行细菌分离鉴定,然后采用圆盘扩散法对医院常用抗生素葡萄球菌进行药敏分析。最后,鉴定出MecA、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、大环内酯-lincosamide和链状gramin基因具有莫匹罗星耐药、β -内酰胺酶和万古霉素耐药表型。结果:主要分离种为金黄色葡萄球菌(197株,49.3%),其次为溶血葡萄球菌(115株,28.8%)、表皮葡萄球菌(49株,12.3%)、人型葡萄球菌(9.0株,2.3%)、重度葡萄球菌(8.0株,2.0%)和香状葡萄球菌(4.0株,1.0%)。所有分离种均对青霉素G、氨苄西林、头孢噻肟和头孢西丁耐药。89.5% (n = 358)为β -内酰胺酶表型,18.0% (n = 72)为MecA基因表型,2.8% (n = 11)为莫匹罗星耐药表型,2.0% (n = 8.0)为万古霉素耐药表型。此外,12株菌株同时具有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(66.7%)和大环内酯-lincosamide和链状gramin基因(65.2%)。大多数患者(n = 172)年龄在50岁至50岁之间,占43%;男性占52.25% (n = 209)。大多数标本来自尿路感染(73例)、伤口(71例)、血液(35例)、痰(29例)、脓(28例)、精液(27例)、脑脊液(1.0例)和粪便(1.0例)。MSLb基因的分离株对格林霉素(94.6%)和红霉素(84.7%)均有高度显著耐药(p)。结论:临床样品中分离到的葡萄球菌以金黄色葡萄球菌为主,大部分葡萄球菌对常用抗生素均有耐药,并出现耐药基因和耐药表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology, clinical manifestation, diagnosis,and treatment of bursitis iliopectinea: A systematic review. Experiences and overall impact reported by people living with obesity: results from a multinational study. Long-term sublingual bacterial immunotherapy prevents ear, nose and throat infections: A real-life study. 1990-2041 Global burden of Burkitt lymphoma with 20 years forecast: A systematic analysis using the global burden disease of study of 2021. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms after recovery from COVID-19: A questionnaire-based study in the Aseer region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1