Planning Matters: A Document Analysis of 24 Portuguese Health Programmes.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1002/hpm.3885
Soraia Costa, Inês Morais Vilaça, Daniela Lima, Lara Pinheiro-Guedes, Suzana Barbosa, Sílvia Salvador, Rachel Barbabela, Ana Cristina Carvalho, Paula Oliveira, Ana Cecília Chaves, Margarida Teixeira, Diogo Caveiro, Alexandre Vieira, Teresa Leão
{"title":"Planning Matters: A Document Analysis of 24 Portuguese Health Programmes.","authors":"Soraia Costa, Inês Morais Vilaça, Daniela Lima, Lara Pinheiro-Guedes, Suzana Barbosa, Sílvia Salvador, Rachel Barbabela, Ana Cristina Carvalho, Paula Oliveira, Ana Cecília Chaves, Margarida Teixeira, Diogo Caveiro, Alexandre Vieira, Teresa Leão","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health planning is essential for effective public health interventions and optimal resource utilisation. The Portuguese Directorate-General of Health has a long history of developing health plans and programmes, for communicable and noncommunicable diseases, and their determinants. This study aimed to review the current 24 programmes and assess the adequacy of their structure and content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A document analysis was conducted using a programme assessment matrix developed by the research group. Two independent researchers evaluated each programme, scoring items as 'absent', 'present', or 'not applicable'. A quantitative analysis was employed to analyse compliance scores between priority and non-priority programmes and across the year of publication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Priority programs demonstrated higher and more consistent compliance scores compared to non-priority programs. Compliance scores ranged from 19% in the Sexual and Reproductive Health Programme to 100% in the Healthy Eating Programme. The item least commonly present was 'updated time scope', in only 21% of the programmes. Most recently published programmes were more likely to have a higher compliance score (Β = 0.76, 95% CI: [0.46, 1.05]). Not all programmes were publicly available in the same digital location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was heterogeneity in the 24 health promotion programmes in terms of structure, content, timeliness, and accessibility. A standardised structure could enhance their quality and ease their interpretation and dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health planning is essential for effective public health interventions and optimal resource utilisation. The Portuguese Directorate-General of Health has a long history of developing health plans and programmes, for communicable and noncommunicable diseases, and their determinants. This study aimed to review the current 24 programmes and assess the adequacy of their structure and content.

Methods: A document analysis was conducted using a programme assessment matrix developed by the research group. Two independent researchers evaluated each programme, scoring items as 'absent', 'present', or 'not applicable'. A quantitative analysis was employed to analyse compliance scores between priority and non-priority programmes and across the year of publication.

Results: Priority programs demonstrated higher and more consistent compliance scores compared to non-priority programs. Compliance scores ranged from 19% in the Sexual and Reproductive Health Programme to 100% in the Healthy Eating Programme. The item least commonly present was 'updated time scope', in only 21% of the programmes. Most recently published programmes were more likely to have a higher compliance score (Β = 0.76, 95% CI: [0.46, 1.05]). Not all programmes were publicly available in the same digital location.

Conclusions: There was heterogeneity in the 24 health promotion programmes in terms of structure, content, timeliness, and accessibility. A standardised structure could enhance their quality and ease their interpretation and dissemination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规划事项:对24个葡萄牙保健方案的文件分析。
背景:卫生规划对有效的公共卫生干预和最佳资源利用至关重要。葡萄牙卫生总局在制定传染病和非传染性疾病及其决定因素的卫生计划和方案方面有着悠久的历史。这项研究的目的是审查目前的24个方案,并评价其结构和内容是否适当。方法:采用课题组编制的方案评估矩阵进行文献分析。两名独立研究人员对每个项目进行评估,将项目分为“缺席”、“存在”或“不适用”。采用定量分析来分析优先和非优先方案之间以及整个出版年度的合规得分。结果:与非优先方案相比,优先方案表现出更高和更一致的依从性得分。合规得分从性健康和生殖健康方案的19%到健康饮食方案的100%不等。最不常出现的项目是“更新时间范围”,只有21%的节目出现。最近发布的方案更有可能具有更高的依从性评分(Β = 0.76, 95% CI:[0.46, 1.05])。并非所有节目都能在同一个数字位置上公开观看。结论:24个健康促进项目在结构、内容、及时性和可及性方面存在异质性。一个标准化的结构可以提高它们的质量,便于解释和传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of a Mixed-Methods Assessment of Patient Experiences to Inform Quality Improvement in an Emergency Department in Argentina. Defining Health Management: A Conceptual Foundation for Excellence Through Efficiency, Sustainability and Equity. A Next Available Appointment (NAA) Tool to Better Manage Patient Delay Risk and Patient Scheduling Expectations in Specialist Clinics. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Long-Acting and Permanent Methods (LAPMs) of Family Planning Among Women of Reproductive Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Long-Term Care Insurance and Health Inequality: Evidence From China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1