Epiretinal Membrane and Senile Cataract: Combined vs Sequential Surgery.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000004371
Tommaso Mori, Vincenzo Barone, Sebastiano Nunziata, Pier Luigi Surico, Simone Stefanini, Valentina Mastrofilippo, Antonio Di Zazzo, Marco Coassin
{"title":"Epiretinal Membrane and Senile Cataract: Combined vs Sequential Surgery.","authors":"Tommaso Mori, Vincenzo Barone, Sebastiano Nunziata, Pier Luigi Surico, Simone Stefanini, Valentina Mastrofilippo, Antonio Di Zazzo, Marco Coassin","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of combined phacovitrectomy versus sequential phacoemulsification and vitrectomy in patients with both senile cataract and epiretinal membrane (ERM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter study was conducted between 2014 and 2022 at two hospitals in Italy. Patients with idiopathic ERM and senile cataract in the same eye were enrolled and underwent either combined (n=38) or sequential surgery (n=38), performed by a single surgeon. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both surgical approaches significantly improved BCVA and reduced CMT after 6 months. However, sequential surgery showed faster visual recovery, with significant improvements in BCVA (P=0.008) and CMT (P<0.0001) observed as early as 1-month post-surgery, compared to the combined group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although both surgical approaches yielded significant improvements in visual acuity and central macular thickness at 6 months, the sequential approach offered a faster recovery in the early postoperative period. According to the literature, the sequential approach also allows some patients to be satisfied after cataract surgery alone, potentially avoiding unnecessary vitrectomy and reducing the risk of overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of combined phacovitrectomy versus sequential phacoemulsification and vitrectomy in patients with both senile cataract and epiretinal membrane (ERM).

Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted between 2014 and 2022 at two hospitals in Italy. Patients with idiopathic ERM and senile cataract in the same eye were enrolled and underwent either combined (n=38) or sequential surgery (n=38), performed by a single surgeon. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

Results: Both surgical approaches significantly improved BCVA and reduced CMT after 6 months. However, sequential surgery showed faster visual recovery, with significant improvements in BCVA (P=0.008) and CMT (P<0.0001) observed as early as 1-month post-surgery, compared to the combined group.

Conclusion: Although both surgical approaches yielded significant improvements in visual acuity and central macular thickness at 6 months, the sequential approach offered a faster recovery in the early postoperative period. According to the literature, the sequential approach also allows some patients to be satisfied after cataract surgery alone, potentially avoiding unnecessary vitrectomy and reducing the risk of overtreatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜前膜与老年性白内障:联合手术与顺序手术。
目的:评价老年性白内障合并视网膜前膜(ERM)患者行联合超声乳化玻璃体切除术与序贯超声乳化玻璃体切除术的疗效。方法:2014年至2022年在意大利两家医院进行回顾性多中心研究。同一只眼睛的特发性ERM和老年性白内障患者被纳入研究,并接受了由一名外科医生进行的联合手术(n=38)或顺序手术(n=38)。分别于术后1、3、6个月测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中央黄斑厚度(CMT)。结果:6个月后两种手术入路均显著改善BCVA,降低CMT。然而,顺序手术显示更快的视力恢复,BCVA (P=0.008)和CMT (P)有显著改善。结论:虽然两种手术入路在6个月时视力和黄斑中央厚度均有显著改善,但顺序手术在术后早期恢复更快。据文献报道,序贯入路也可以让一些患者在单独白内障手术后感到满意,潜在地避免了不必要的玻璃体切割,降低了过度治疗的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
期刊最新文献
Periocular Acupuncture Leading to Retinal Tear and Successful Repairment. PSEUDO RETINAL VASCULITIS IN A PRETERM BABY. Human Amniotic Membrane Patches Dislocated in the Anterior Chamber. AN EASY WAY TO PREVENT VELOCITY-RELATED COMPLICATIONS DURING DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT INJECTION IN VITRECTOMIZED EYES. VITRECTOMY COMBINED WITH INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP INSERTION OR SINGLE-LAYERED FLAP COVERING TECHNIQUE FOR HIGHLY MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES WITH MACULAR RETINOSCHISIS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1