Assessment of an eye-tracking tool to discriminate between concussed and not concussed professional male rugby players: a cohort study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Physician and Sportsmedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1080/00913847.2024.2442294
James Brown, Gordon Ward Fuller, Warren McDonald, Karen Rasmussen, Thomas Sawczuk, Mark Gilthorpe, Ben Jones, Éanna Cian Falvey
{"title":"Assessment of an eye-tracking tool to discriminate between concussed and not concussed professional male rugby players: a cohort study.","authors":"James Brown, Gordon Ward Fuller, Warren McDonald, Karen Rasmussen, Thomas Sawczuk, Mark Gilthorpe, Ben Jones, Éanna Cian Falvey","doi":"10.1080/00913847.2024.2442294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Concussion is a common injury in rugby union ('rugby') and yet its diagnosis is reliant on clinical judgment. Oculomotor testing could provide an objective measure to assist with concussion diagnosis. NeuroFlex® evaluates oculomotor function using a virtual-reality headset. This study examined differences in NeuroFlex® performance in clinician-diagnosed concussed and not concussed elite male rugby players over three seasons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NeuroFlex® testing was completed alongside 140 head injury assessments (HIAs) in 122 players. The HIA is used for suspected concussion events. Of these 140 HIAs, 100 were eventually diagnosed as concussed, 38 were not concussed (2 were unclear) Eight of the 61 NeuroFlex® metrics were analysed as they were comparable at all time points. These eight metrics, from three oculomotor domains (vestibulo-ocular reflex, smooth pursuit and saccades), were tested for their ability to distinguish between concussed and not concussed players using mean difference / odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI's). General and generalised linear mixed models, accounting for baseline test performance, were used to determine any meaningful differences in concussed and not concussed players. The diagnostic accuracy of these differences was provided by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only one of the eight metrics (number of saccades, smooth pursuit domain) had clear differences in performance between concussed and not concussed players at the HIA during the match (odds ratio: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.54-0.98) and after 48 hours (0.74, 95%CI: 0.52-0.96). However, the direction of this difference was contrary to clinical expectations (concussed performed better than not concussed) and the AUC for this outcome was also poor (0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NeuroFlex® was unable to distinguish between concussed and not concussed players in this elite male cohort. Future research could study other cohorts, later time points before return to play, and the tool's role in rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51268,"journal":{"name":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2024.2442294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Concussion is a common injury in rugby union ('rugby') and yet its diagnosis is reliant on clinical judgment. Oculomotor testing could provide an objective measure to assist with concussion diagnosis. NeuroFlex® evaluates oculomotor function using a virtual-reality headset. This study examined differences in NeuroFlex® performance in clinician-diagnosed concussed and not concussed elite male rugby players over three seasons.

Methods: NeuroFlex® testing was completed alongside 140 head injury assessments (HIAs) in 122 players. The HIA is used for suspected concussion events. Of these 140 HIAs, 100 were eventually diagnosed as concussed, 38 were not concussed (2 were unclear) Eight of the 61 NeuroFlex® metrics were analysed as they were comparable at all time points. These eight metrics, from three oculomotor domains (vestibulo-ocular reflex, smooth pursuit and saccades), were tested for their ability to distinguish between concussed and not concussed players using mean difference / odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI's). General and generalised linear mixed models, accounting for baseline test performance, were used to determine any meaningful differences in concussed and not concussed players. The diagnostic accuracy of these differences was provided by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).

Results: Only one of the eight metrics (number of saccades, smooth pursuit domain) had clear differences in performance between concussed and not concussed players at the HIA during the match (odds ratio: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.54-0.98) and after 48 hours (0.74, 95%CI: 0.52-0.96). However, the direction of this difference was contrary to clinical expectations (concussed performed better than not concussed) and the AUC for this outcome was also poor (0.52).

Conclusion: NeuroFlex® was unable to distinguish between concussed and not concussed players in this elite male cohort. Future research could study other cohorts, later time points before return to play, and the tool's role in rehabilitation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估眼动追踪工具区分脑震荡和未脑震荡的职业橄榄球运动员:一项队列研究。
脑震荡是橄榄球联盟(“橄榄球”)中常见的损伤,但其诊断依赖于临床判断。动眼肌测试可以提供客观的措施,以协助脑震荡的诊断。NeuroFlex®使用虚拟现实耳机评估动眼肌功能。本研究在三个赛季中检查了临床诊断为脑震荡和非脑震荡的优秀男橄榄球运动员在NeuroFlex®表现上的差异。NeuroFlex®测试与122名球员的140次头部损伤评估(HIAs)一起完成。HIA用于疑似脑震荡事件。在这140例HIAs中,100例最终被诊断为脑震荡,38例未被诊断为脑震荡(2例不清楚)。61个NeuroFlex®指标中的8个在所有时间点都具有可比性,因此进行了分析。这8个指标来自3个眼动域(前庭-眼反射、平滑追踪和扫视),我们使用平均差/比值比和相应的95%置信区间(CI)来测试它们区分脑震荡和非脑震荡球员的能力。一般和广义线性混合模型,考虑基线测试性能,用于确定脑震荡和未脑震荡球员的任何有意义的差异。这些差异的诊断准确性由受者工作曲线下面积(AUC)提供。在8个指标中,只有1个指标(扫视次数、平滑追踪域)在比赛期间(优势比:0.76,95%CI: 0.54-0.98)和48小时后(优势比:0.74,95%CI: 0.52-0.96)在HIA中有明显差异。然而,这种差异的方向与临床预期相反(震荡优于非震荡),该结果的AUC也很差(0.52)。总之,在这个精英男性队列中,NeuroFlex®无法区分脑震荡和未脑震荡的球员。未来的研究可以研究其他队列,在回归游戏之前的晚些时间点,以及该工具在康复中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physician and Sportsmedicine
Physician and Sportsmedicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-reviewed, clinically oriented publication for primary care physicians. We examine the latest drug discoveries to advance treatment and recovery, and take into account the medical aspects of exercise therapy for a given condition. We cover the latest primary care-focused treatments serving the needs of our active patient population, and assess the limits these treatments govern in stabilization and recovery. The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-to-peer method of communicating the latest research to aid primary care physicians’ advancement in methods of care and treatment. We routinely cover such topics as: managing chronic disease, surgical techniques in preventing and managing injuries, the latest advancements in treatments for helping patients lose weight, and related exercise and nutrition topics that can impact the patient during recovery and modification.
期刊最新文献
Return to play and athletic performance in division I female volleyball players following anterior cruciate ligament injury. Degenerative changes of the wrist in mixed martial arts and boxing based on the three column theory. Impact of repeated sportive chokes on carotid intima media thickness and brain injury biomarkers in grappling athletes. Illness is more prevalent than injury in trail runners participating in a mountainous ultra trail race. Medical advisability of softball youth pitching recommendations on the internet.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1