The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen's egg allergy.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s13223-024-00941-4
Mika Ogata, Jun Kido, Takanobu Yoshida, Natsuko Nishi, Sachiko Shimomura, Nami Hirai, Tomoyuki Mizukami, Masaaki Yanai, Kimitoshi Nakamura
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of stepwise oral food challenge in children with hen's egg allergy.","authors":"Mika Ogata, Jun Kido, Takanobu Yoshida, Natsuko Nishi, Sachiko Shimomura, Nami Hirai, Tomoyuki Mizukami, Masaaki Yanai, Kimitoshi Nakamura","doi":"10.1186/s13223-024-00941-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold standard for diagnosing food allergies (FAs) but carries the risk of anaphylactic reaction. Stepwise OFC, starting with a low dose of allergen and progressing to medium and full doses, is effective in determining a tolerable dose. We retrospectively evaluated the results of a stepwise OFC for hen's egg (HE) to demonstrate its safety and efficacy. We discuss whether early low-dose administration of HE induces early immune tolerance in HE allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 2,058 children (median, 2.6 years) who underwent HE-OFC between 2017 and 2021 at two institutes in Japan. The target challenge dose of OFC was classified as low (less than 1/8 of a cooked egg), medium (1/8 or more but less than 1/2), or full (1/2 or more). If the low-dose OFC was negative, subjects were allowed to consume the same dose of HE and underwent medium-dose OFC within 12 months. Even if positive, individuals were recommended to consume previously-tolerated amounts of HE and repeat OFC at the same dose within 12 months. We evaluated the correlation between their OFC results and response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 526 (25.6%) children presented positive reactions. There were no cases of anaphylactic shock. Higher serum egg white (EW)- (P < 0.001) and ovomucoid (OVM)- specific IgE (P < 0.001) (sIgE) levels were associated with positive OFC. The low-dose OFC group had more positive reactions (P < 0.001), younger children (P < 0.001), higher EW-sIgE (P < 0.001) and OVM-sIgE (P < 0.001), and more histories of anaphylaxis (P = 0.014). OFC-positive children were younger than OFC-negative children, particularly in low-dose OFC (P = 0.010). OFC results between complete and partial elimination of HE groups across all EW- or OVM-sIgE classes were similar (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stepwise OFC is safe and effective in diagnosing HE allergy and facilitates the earlier introduction of HE in children. This study suggests the limited potential of early consumption of lower doses of HE to induce earlier immune tolerance, such that other strategies to induce earlier tolerance in infants with HE allergy should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":51302,"journal":{"name":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","volume":"20 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00941-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold standard for diagnosing food allergies (FAs) but carries the risk of anaphylactic reaction. Stepwise OFC, starting with a low dose of allergen and progressing to medium and full doses, is effective in determining a tolerable dose. We retrospectively evaluated the results of a stepwise OFC for hen's egg (HE) to demonstrate its safety and efficacy. We discuss whether early low-dose administration of HE induces early immune tolerance in HE allergy.

Methods: We included 2,058 children (median, 2.6 years) who underwent HE-OFC between 2017 and 2021 at two institutes in Japan. The target challenge dose of OFC was classified as low (less than 1/8 of a cooked egg), medium (1/8 or more but less than 1/2), or full (1/2 or more). If the low-dose OFC was negative, subjects were allowed to consume the same dose of HE and underwent medium-dose OFC within 12 months. Even if positive, individuals were recommended to consume previously-tolerated amounts of HE and repeat OFC at the same dose within 12 months. We evaluated the correlation between their OFC results and response.

Results: A total of 526 (25.6%) children presented positive reactions. There were no cases of anaphylactic shock. Higher serum egg white (EW)- (P < 0.001) and ovomucoid (OVM)- specific IgE (P < 0.001) (sIgE) levels were associated with positive OFC. The low-dose OFC group had more positive reactions (P < 0.001), younger children (P < 0.001), higher EW-sIgE (P < 0.001) and OVM-sIgE (P < 0.001), and more histories of anaphylaxis (P = 0.014). OFC-positive children were younger than OFC-negative children, particularly in low-dose OFC (P = 0.010). OFC results between complete and partial elimination of HE groups across all EW- or OVM-sIgE classes were similar (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Stepwise OFC is safe and effective in diagnosing HE allergy and facilitates the earlier introduction of HE in children. This study suggests the limited potential of early consumption of lower doses of HE to induce earlier immune tolerance, such that other strategies to induce earlier tolerance in infants with HE allergy should be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逐步口服食物刺激对鸡蛋过敏儿童的疗效和安全性。
背景:口腔食物激发(OFC)是诊断食物过敏(FAs)的金标准,但存在过敏反应的风险。逐步OFC,从低剂量过敏原开始,逐步到中等和完全剂量,在确定可耐受剂量方面是有效的。我们回顾性评估了逐步OFC对鸡蛋(HE)的结果,以证明其安全性和有效性。我们讨论早期低剂量HE是否诱导HE过敏的早期免疫耐受。方法:我们纳入了2017年至2021年间在日本两所研究所接受HE-OFC治疗的2058名儿童(中位年龄2.6岁)。OFC的目标攻毒剂量分为低剂量(低于煮熟鸡蛋的1/8)、中剂量(1/8或更多但低于1/2)和完全剂量(1/2或更多)。如果低剂量的OFC为阴性,则允许受试者在12个月内服用相同剂量的HE并进行中剂量的OFC。即使呈阳性,也建议患者在12个月内服用先前耐受量的HE并重复使用相同剂量的OFC。我们评估了他们的OFC结果与反应之间的相关性。结果:526例患儿出现阳性反应,占25.6%。无过敏性休克病例。血清蛋清(EW)-升高(p0.05)。结论:渐进式OFC诊断HE过敏安全有效,有助于儿童早期引入HE。这项研究表明,早期使用低剂量HE诱导早期免疫耐受的潜力有限,因此应该考虑其他策略来诱导早期HE过敏婴儿的免疫耐受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (AACI), the official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and treatment of allergic and immunologic disease. By offering a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions, AACI provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy and clinical immunology research and reviews amongst allergists, pulmonologists, immunologists and other physicians, healthcare workers, medical students and the public worldwide. AACI reports on basic research and clinically applied studies in the following areas and other related topics: asthma and occupational lung disease, rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic skin diseases, urticaria and angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, immune deficiency and autoimmunity, T cell and B cell functions, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, mast cell and eosinophil functions, complement abnormalities.
期刊最新文献
Food oral immunotherapy. Moisturizer induced contact anaphylaxis. Early diagnosis of hereditary angioedema in children: genetic testing should be prioritized. Asthma. Biphasic anaphylaxis in a Canadian tertiary care centre: an evaluation of incidence and risk factors from electronic health records and telephone interviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1