Training in Lumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Using a 3D-Printed Model: From Validation to Transferability Onto a Cadaver Model.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00699
Byron Delgado, Mauricio Campos, Daniel Lobos, Jorge Cuéllar, Cristian Ruz, Pablo Besa, Javier Castro, Catalina Vidal
{"title":"Training in Lumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Using a 3D-Printed Model: From Validation to Transferability Onto a Cadaver Model.","authors":"Byron Delgado, Mauricio Campos, Daniel Lobos, Jorge Cuéllar, Cristian Ruz, Pablo Besa, Javier Castro, Catalina Vidal","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbar pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery is complex and prone to errors, with notable risks to patients. Standard training methods, such as mentorship in operating rooms, pose safety concerns, prompting the need for alternative training tools. This study aimed to validate and use a three-dimensional (3D)-printed simulation model for lumbar pedicle screw insertion training and assess its effectiveness compared with standard methods. The study proceeded through four phases: model design and validation, construct validation, learning curve assessment, and transfer to a cadaver model. A 3D-printed lumbar spine model was created and refined based on expert feedback. Construct validation demonstrated the model's ability to differentiate between experts and novices. Training sessions with residents showed a notable improvement in performance over multiple attempts, but performance still lagged that of experts. However, skills learned on the simulation model were effectively transferred to a cadaver model, with no notable difference in performance observed. The trained group outperformed a control group trained using standard methods in the cadaver test. The study concludes that the 3D-printed simulation model is a valid training tool for lumbar pedicle screw insertion, effectively transferring skills to a cadaver setting and improving resident performance compared with standard training methods. Additional research is warranted to explore the sustainability of acquired skills and optimize training protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lumbar pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery is complex and prone to errors, with notable risks to patients. Standard training methods, such as mentorship in operating rooms, pose safety concerns, prompting the need for alternative training tools. This study aimed to validate and use a three-dimensional (3D)-printed simulation model for lumbar pedicle screw insertion training and assess its effectiveness compared with standard methods. The study proceeded through four phases: model design and validation, construct validation, learning curve assessment, and transfer to a cadaver model. A 3D-printed lumbar spine model was created and refined based on expert feedback. Construct validation demonstrated the model's ability to differentiate between experts and novices. Training sessions with residents showed a notable improvement in performance over multiple attempts, but performance still lagged that of experts. However, skills learned on the simulation model were effectively transferred to a cadaver model, with no notable difference in performance observed. The trained group outperformed a control group trained using standard methods in the cadaver test. The study concludes that the 3D-printed simulation model is a valid training tool for lumbar pedicle screw insertion, effectively transferring skills to a cadaver setting and improving resident performance compared with standard training methods. Additional research is warranted to explore the sustainability of acquired skills and optimize training protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
Increasing Body Mass Index Not Associated With Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes After Primary THA or TKA. Postoperative Complications and Readmission Rates in Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: Large, Propensity Score-Matched Patient Cohorts. Advances in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Glenoid Implant Design. Evolution of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Design Rationales and Where We Are Now. The Power of Preference Signaling: A Monumental Shift in the Orthopaedic Surgery Application Process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1