Strategies to Improve Research Participation By Older People With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae188
Lucinda Swan, Slavica Kochovska, Nola Ries, Imelda Gilmore, Deborah Parker, Craig Sinclair, Caitlin Sheehan, Aileen Collier, Elizabeth Lobb, Linda Sheahan, Linda Brown, Michael Chapman, Wei Lee, Ingrid Amgarth-Duff, Timothy To, Meera R Agar, Annmarie Hosie
{"title":"Strategies to Improve Research Participation By Older People With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Lucinda Swan, Slavica Kochovska, Nola Ries, Imelda Gilmore, Deborah Parker, Craig Sinclair, Caitlin Sheehan, Aileen Collier, Elizabeth Lobb, Linda Sheahan, Linda Brown, Michael Chapman, Wei Lee, Ingrid Amgarth-Duff, Timothy To, Meera R Agar, Annmarie Hosie","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older people with cognitive impairment are unrepresented in clinical research. Our objective was to review evidence for strategies to support their research inclusion and participation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Systematic review of published reports of inclusion and participation strategies for older people with cognitive impairment in clinical research (PROSPERO CRD42020212092). 5 databases were searched in September 2020, March 2023, and April 2024. Screening, full-text review, and data extraction were independently performed. The risk of bias was assessed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Methodology Checklists. Outcomes were participant characteristics, recruitment and consent processes, retention, experience, involvement of others, adverse events, and other reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,564 identified sources, 12 studies were included. 9 compared recruitment strategies; 3 examined consent processes. Of 4,208 participants (mean age 78.3 years), 61% were female. Median (interquartile range) monthly recruitment rate was 10.3 (5.6-14.8). Participants had mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and/or delirium, and two-thirds of the studies involved proxies or study partners. Community outreach or population screening had higher recruitment compared with primary care referral and/or screening. Formal capacity and consent methods achieved lower rates of consent compared with informal. A memory and organizational aid increased participants' ability to provide informed consent compared with standard assessment. Few studies reported participants' or recruiters' subjective experience, and no studies reported participant retention or adverse events.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Targeted, tailored, and multi-pronged recruitment and consent strategies to support the inclusion of older people with cognitive impairment appear promising. Higher-quality studies are needed to confirm this finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Older people with cognitive impairment are unrepresented in clinical research. Our objective was to review evidence for strategies to support their research inclusion and participation.

Research design and methods: Systematic review of published reports of inclusion and participation strategies for older people with cognitive impairment in clinical research (PROSPERO CRD42020212092). 5 databases were searched in September 2020, March 2023, and April 2024. Screening, full-text review, and data extraction were independently performed. The risk of bias was assessed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Methodology Checklists. Outcomes were participant characteristics, recruitment and consent processes, retention, experience, involvement of others, adverse events, and other reported outcomes.

Results: Of 4,564 identified sources, 12 studies were included. 9 compared recruitment strategies; 3 examined consent processes. Of 4,208 participants (mean age 78.3 years), 61% were female. Median (interquartile range) monthly recruitment rate was 10.3 (5.6-14.8). Participants had mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and/or delirium, and two-thirds of the studies involved proxies or study partners. Community outreach or population screening had higher recruitment compared with primary care referral and/or screening. Formal capacity and consent methods achieved lower rates of consent compared with informal. A memory and organizational aid increased participants' ability to provide informed consent compared with standard assessment. Few studies reported participants' or recruiters' subjective experience, and no studies reported participant retention or adverse events.

Discussion and implications: Targeted, tailored, and multi-pronged recruitment and consent strategies to support the inclusion of older people with cognitive impairment appear promising. Higher-quality studies are needed to confirm this finding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高老年认知障碍患者参与研究的策略:系统综述。
背景和目的:老年认知障碍患者在临床研究中没有代表性。我们的目标是为支持他们的研究纳入和参与的策略审查证据。研究设计和方法:系统回顾已发表的关于临床研究中老年人认知障碍纳入和参与策略的报告(PROSPERO CRD42020212092)。5个数据库分别于2020年9月、2023年3月和2024年4月检索。筛选、全文审阅和数据提取独立进行。使用苏格兰校际指南网络方法学检查表评估偏倚风险。结果包括参与者特征、招募和同意过程、保留、经验、他人参与、不良事件和其他报告的结果。结果:在4564个已确定的来源中,纳入了12项研究。9个比较招聘策略;其中三个研究了同意程序。在4208名参与者(平均年龄78.3岁)中,61%为女性。每月招聘率中位数(四分位数间距)为10.3(5.6-14.8)。参与者有轻度认知障碍、痴呆和/或谵妄,三分之二的研究涉及代理或研究伙伴。与初级保健转诊和/或筛查相比,社区外展或人群筛查的招募率更高。与非正式方法相比,正式能力和同意方法获得的同意率较低。与标准评估相比,记忆和组织援助提高了参与者提供知情同意的能力。很少有研究报告了参与者或招聘人员的主观体验,也没有研究报告了参与者的保留或不良事件。讨论和启示:有针对性、量身定制和多管齐下的招募和同意策略,以支持纳入有认知障碍的老年人,似乎很有希望。需要更高质量的研究来证实这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
"We have a long way to go": palliative care clinicians' reflections on inclusive care for LGBTQI+ older adult patients and care partners. Aging in place or relocating? Older adults' housing decisions in Taiwan and Finland. Improving gerontological research dissemination: PARTNERship with people with lived experience in research symposia. Equitable speech technologies for older adults: a call to prioritize low resource languages. Digital Health Interventions for Urinary Tract Infection Prevention and Management in People Living with Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1