Strategies to improve research participation by older people with cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae188
Lucinda Swan, Slavica Kochovska, Nola Ries, Imelda Gilmore, Deborah Parker, Craig Sinclair, Caitlin Sheehan, Aileen Collier, Elizabeth Lobb, Linda Sheahan, Linda Brown, Michael Chapman, Wei Lee, Ingrid Amgarth-Duff, Timothy To, Meera R Agar, Annmarie Hosie
{"title":"Strategies to improve research participation by older people with cognitive impairment: a systematic review.","authors":"Lucinda Swan, Slavica Kochovska, Nola Ries, Imelda Gilmore, Deborah Parker, Craig Sinclair, Caitlin Sheehan, Aileen Collier, Elizabeth Lobb, Linda Sheahan, Linda Brown, Michael Chapman, Wei Lee, Ingrid Amgarth-Duff, Timothy To, Meera R Agar, Annmarie Hosie","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older people with cognitive impairment are unrepresented in clinical research. Our objective was to review evidence for strategies to support their research inclusion and participation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Systematic review of published reports of inclusion and participation strategies for older people with cognitive impairment in clinical research (PROSPERO CRD42020212092). Five databases were searched September 2020, March 2023 and April 2024. Screening, full text review and data extraction were independently performed. Risk of bias was assessed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Methodology Checklists. Outcomes were participant characteristics, recruitment and consent processes, retention, experience, involvement of others, adverse events, and other reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4564 identified sources, 12 studies were included. Nine compared recruitment strategies; three examined consent processes. Of 4,208 participants (mean age 78.3 years), 61% were female. Median (interquartile range) monthly recruitment rate was 10.3 (5.6-14.8). Participants had mild cognitive impairment, dementia and/or delirium and two-thirds of studies involved proxies or study partners. Community outreach or population screening had higher recruitment compared to primary care referral and/or screening. Formal capacity and consent methods achieved lower rates of consent compared to informal. A memory and organisational aid increased participants' ability to provide informed consent compared to standard assessment. Few studies reported participants' or recruiters' subjective experience, and no studies reported participant retention or adverse events.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Targeted, tailored and multi-pronged recruitment and consent strategies to support inclusion of older people with cognitive impairment appear promising. Higher quality studies are needed to confirm this finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Older people with cognitive impairment are unrepresented in clinical research. Our objective was to review evidence for strategies to support their research inclusion and participation.

Research design and methods: Systematic review of published reports of inclusion and participation strategies for older people with cognitive impairment in clinical research (PROSPERO CRD42020212092). Five databases were searched September 2020, March 2023 and April 2024. Screening, full text review and data extraction were independently performed. Risk of bias was assessed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Methodology Checklists. Outcomes were participant characteristics, recruitment and consent processes, retention, experience, involvement of others, adverse events, and other reported outcomes.

Results: Of 4564 identified sources, 12 studies were included. Nine compared recruitment strategies; three examined consent processes. Of 4,208 participants (mean age 78.3 years), 61% were female. Median (interquartile range) monthly recruitment rate was 10.3 (5.6-14.8). Participants had mild cognitive impairment, dementia and/or delirium and two-thirds of studies involved proxies or study partners. Community outreach or population screening had higher recruitment compared to primary care referral and/or screening. Formal capacity and consent methods achieved lower rates of consent compared to informal. A memory and organisational aid increased participants' ability to provide informed consent compared to standard assessment. Few studies reported participants' or recruiters' subjective experience, and no studies reported participant retention or adverse events.

Discussion and implications: Targeted, tailored and multi-pronged recruitment and consent strategies to support inclusion of older people with cognitive impairment appear promising. Higher quality studies are needed to confirm this finding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and healthcare utilization among aging veterans in supported housing: A comparison with independently housed age-matched veterans. Communications needs of family caregivers of geriatric unit residents at end-of-life. Taking Action to Support Nursing Home Resident Wellbeing: Perspectives of U.S. Nursing Home Staff During COVID-19. Supporting older people experiencing homelessness and memory problems in hostels: Learning from an ethnographic study. Focusing on Caregiver Neglect: A Novel Strategy for Mistreatment of Older Adults Screening and Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1