Serum free light chain level-based and non-fixed cycle daratumumab treatment strategy for patients with light chain amyloidosis.

Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2024.2442075
Zhen Li, Jinzhou Guo, Wencui Chen, Liang Zhao, Guisheng Ren, Xianghua Huang
{"title":"Serum free light chain level-based and non-fixed cycle daratumumab treatment strategy for patients with light chain amyloidosis.","authors":"Zhen Li, Jinzhou Guo, Wencui Chen, Liang Zhao, Guisheng Ren, Xianghua Huang","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2442075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, daratumumab (DARA) has gained widespread use in the treatment of systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of a DARA treatment strategy based on serum free light chain (sFLC) levels and non-fixed cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 123 patients with Al amyloidosis who received DARA at our center between July 2020 and September 2023. All patients received the standard DARA treatment (16 mg/kg weekly for four weeks) during the first course. Subsequent treatments were adjusted based on sFLC levels and the physician's judgment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated an impressive overall hematologic response rate (ORR) of 94.3%, with a hematologic very good partial response (VGPR) and complete response (CR) rate of 84.5%. Median time to best hematologic response was 1 months. Cardiac and renal response rates were 39.3% and 60.3%, respectively. Thirty patients experienced grade 1/2 infusion-related reactions after the first infusion. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events was 21%. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were pulmonary infection (6.5%), neutropenia and lymphocytopenia (5.7%), elevated transaminases (1.6%), acute kidney injury (1.6%). After a median follow-up of 13 months (range 1-38), The 1-year OS and PFS estimates were 96.5% and 84.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that the sFLC levels based and non-fixed cycle DARA strategy is an efficacious and safe treatment strategy in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2442075"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2442075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, daratumumab (DARA) has gained widespread use in the treatment of systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of a DARA treatment strategy based on serum free light chain (sFLC) levels and non-fixed cycles.

Methods: The study included 123 patients with Al amyloidosis who received DARA at our center between July 2020 and September 2023. All patients received the standard DARA treatment (16 mg/kg weekly for four weeks) during the first course. Subsequent treatments were adjusted based on sFLC levels and the physician's judgment.

Results: The results demonstrated an impressive overall hematologic response rate (ORR) of 94.3%, with a hematologic very good partial response (VGPR) and complete response (CR) rate of 84.5%. Median time to best hematologic response was 1 months. Cardiac and renal response rates were 39.3% and 60.3%, respectively. Thirty patients experienced grade 1/2 infusion-related reactions after the first infusion. The rate of grade 3/4 adverse events was 21%. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were pulmonary infection (6.5%), neutropenia and lymphocytopenia (5.7%), elevated transaminases (1.6%), acute kidney injury (1.6%). After a median follow-up of 13 months (range 1-38), The 1-year OS and PFS estimates were 96.5% and 84.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that the sFLC levels based and non-fixed cycle DARA strategy is an efficacious and safe treatment strategy in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清游离轻链水平和非固定周期daratumumab治疗轻链淀粉样变性的策略。
背景:近年来,达拉单抗(daratumumab, DARA)在系统性轻链(AL)淀粉样变性的治疗中得到了广泛的应用。在这项研究中,我们评估了基于血清游离轻链(sFLC)水平和非固定周期的DARA治疗策略的有效性和安全性。方法:该研究包括123例在2020年7月至2023年9月期间在我们中心接受DARA治疗的Al淀粉样变性患者。在第一个疗程中,所有患者都接受了标准的DARA治疗(每周16 mg/kg,持续四周)。根据sFLC水平和医生的判断调整后续治疗。结果:结果显示令人印象深刻的总体血液学缓解率(ORR)为94.3%,血液学非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)和完全缓解(CR)率为84.5%。达到最佳血液学反应的中位时间为1个月。心脏和肾脏反应率分别为39.3%和60.3%。30例患者在首次输注后出现1/2级输注相关反应。3/4级不良事件发生率为21%。3级或4级最常见的不良事件是肺部感染(6.5%)、中性粒细胞减少症和淋巴细胞减少症(5.7%)、转氨酶升高(1.6%)、急性肾损伤(1.6%)。中位随访13个月(范围1-38)后,1年OS和PFS估计分别为96.5%和84.4%。结论:基于sFLC水平和非固定周期的DARA策略是新诊断和复发/难治性AL淀粉样变性的有效和安全的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of polyglycolic acid-loading mitomycin nanoparticles in inhibiting the scar proliferation after glaucoma filtering surgery. Development and application of an uncapped mRNA platform. Overexpression of ST8Sia1 inhibits tumor progression by TGF-β1 signaling in rectal adenocarcinoma and promotes the tumoricidal effects of CD8+ T cells by granzyme B and perforin. Early combination of sotrovimab with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir is associated with low rate of persisting SARS CoV-2 infection in immunocompromised outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: a prospective single-centre study. Prognostic indicators and outcome in patients with acute liver failure, sepsis and with and without shock: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1