Intravitreal Faricimab for Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-12-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S494605
Abraham Hang, Taylor Ngo, Jaipreet Singh Virk, Kareem Moussa, Ala Moshiri, Parisa Emami-Naeini, Susanna S Park
{"title":"Intravitreal Faricimab for Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.","authors":"Abraham Hang, Taylor Ngo, Jaipreet Singh Virk, Kareem Moussa, Ala Moshiri, Parisa Emami-Naeini, Susanna S Park","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S494605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report our real-world experience using intravitreal faricimab, a novel anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-center study of previously treated nAMD eyes treated with faricimab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 88 eyes (73 patients), mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/63 (range 20/20 to CF) with mean anti-VEGF injection interval of 6.1+2.0 weeks. Mean baseline central subfield thickness (CST) was 291+73 µm. During mean follow-up of 30.1+13.5 (range 7.0 to 50.3) weeks on faricimab, the eyes received an average of 5.1+2.4 injections (range 1 to 11). Mean BCVA remained at 20/63 (p=0.11), but injection interval increased to 7.4+2.6 weeks (p<0.001), and CST decreased to 262+63 µm (p<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that higher number of different anti-VEGF drugs used at baseline was associated with a lower decrease in CST on faricimab (p=0.04) while total number of anti-VEGF injections at baseline (p=0.56) and time on faricimab (p=0.68) were not associated. Faricimab was discontinued in 23 eyes (26.1%), including 8 eyes for poor response, 2 eyes for persistent new floaters and 4 eyes for new vision decrease which reversed after stopping faricimab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In previously treated nAMD eyes, intravitreal faricimab was associated with increased mean treatment interval and decreased CST but no improvement in mean BCVA. The benefit of faricimab on CST reduction may be diminished in eyes previously treated with multiple different types of anti-VEGF therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3781-3789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S494605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report our real-world experience using intravitreal faricimab, a novel anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with other anti-VEGF therapy.

Patients and methods: A retrospective, single-center study of previously treated nAMD eyes treated with faricimab.

Results: In 88 eyes (73 patients), mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/63 (range 20/20 to CF) with mean anti-VEGF injection interval of 6.1+2.0 weeks. Mean baseline central subfield thickness (CST) was 291+73 µm. During mean follow-up of 30.1+13.5 (range 7.0 to 50.3) weeks on faricimab, the eyes received an average of 5.1+2.4 injections (range 1 to 11). Mean BCVA remained at 20/63 (p=0.11), but injection interval increased to 7.4+2.6 weeks (p<0.001), and CST decreased to 262+63 µm (p<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that higher number of different anti-VEGF drugs used at baseline was associated with a lower decrease in CST on faricimab (p=0.04) while total number of anti-VEGF injections at baseline (p=0.56) and time on faricimab (p=0.68) were not associated. Faricimab was discontinued in 23 eyes (26.1%), including 8 eyes for poor response, 2 eyes for persistent new floaters and 4 eyes for new vision decrease which reversed after stopping faricimab.

Conclusion: In previously treated nAMD eyes, intravitreal faricimab was associated with increased mean treatment interval and decreased CST but no improvement in mean BCVA. The benefit of faricimab on CST reduction may be diminished in eyes previously treated with multiple different types of anti-VEGF therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体内法利西单抗治疗新血管性老年性黄斑变性。
目的:报告我们使用玻璃体内法利西单抗(一种新型抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)疗法)治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的实际经验。患者和方法:一项回顾性、单中心研究,研究对象为既往使用法利昔单抗治疗的nAMD眼。结果:88只眼(73例)平均基线最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为20/63(范围20/20至CF),平均抗vegf注射间隔为6.1+2.0周。平均基线中心子野厚度(CST)为291+73µm。在法昔单抗的平均随访时间为30.1+13.5周(范围7.0至50.3),眼部平均接受5.1+2.4次注射(范围1至11)。平均BCVA保持在20/63 (p=0.11),但注射间隔增加到7.4+2.6周(p结论:在先前治疗过的nAMD眼中,玻璃体内法昔单抗与平均治疗间隔增加和CST降低相关,但平均BCVA没有改善。法利西单抗对CST降低的益处可能会在之前接受多种不同类型的抗vegf治疗的眼睛中减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses. Application of the 2021 AAPOS Guidelines in Clinics with Revision and Validation of SPOT Referral Criteria. Clinical Evaluation of Faricimab in Real-World Diabetic Macular Edema in India- A Multicenter Observational Study. Propensity Score to Compare Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckling in Retrospective Studies [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1