Older women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive or conservative management: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2024-10-26 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae093
Francesca Rubino, Graziella Pompei, Gregory B Mills, Christos P Kotanidis, Claudio Laudani, Bjørn Bendz, Erlend S Berg, David Hildick-Smith, Geir Hirlekar, Nuccia Morici, Aung Myat, Nicolai Tegn, Juan Sanchis Forés, Stefano Savonitto, Stefano De Servi, Vijay Kunadian
{"title":"Older women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive or conservative management: an individual patient data meta-analysis.","authors":"Francesca Rubino, Graziella Pompei, Gregory B Mills, Christos P Kotanidis, Claudio Laudani, Bjørn Bendz, Erlend S Berg, David Hildick-Smith, Geir Hirlekar, Nuccia Morici, Aung Myat, Nicolai Tegn, Juan Sanchis Forés, Stefano Savonitto, Stefano De Servi, Vijay Kunadian","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Women and older patients are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating treatment strategies following acute coronary syndrome. This study aims to evaluate the benefit of invasive vs. conservative strategy of older women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This analysis from an individual patient data meta-analysis included six RCTs comparing an invasive management with a conservative management in older NSTEACS patients. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, MI, urgent revascularization, and stroke. Follow-up time was censored at 1 year. In total, 717 women [median age 84.0 (interquartile range 81.0-87.0) years] were included. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.0% in the invasive strategy vs. 27.8% in the conservative strategy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.13, <i>P</i> = 0.160 using random effect] at 1-year follow-up. The invasive management was associated with reduced risk of MI (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.73, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and urgent revascularization (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.045). No significant differences were identified in the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and stroke. Among males, there was no significant association between the treatment strategy and primary or secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An invasive strategy compared with a conservative strategy did not reduce the composite outcome of all-cause mortality or MI in older NSTEACS women at 1-year follow-up. An invasive strategy reduced the individual risk of MI and urgent revascularization. Our results support the beneficial role of the invasive strategy in older NSTEACS women.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023379819).</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"4 6","pages":"oeae093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Women and older patients are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating treatment strategies following acute coronary syndrome. This study aims to evaluate the benefit of invasive vs. conservative strategy of older women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS).

Methods and results: This analysis from an individual patient data meta-analysis included six RCTs comparing an invasive management with a conservative management in older NSTEACS patients. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, MI, urgent revascularization, and stroke. Follow-up time was censored at 1 year. In total, 717 women [median age 84.0 (interquartile range 81.0-87.0) years] were included. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.0% in the invasive strategy vs. 27.8% in the conservative strategy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.13, P = 0.160 using random effect] at 1-year follow-up. The invasive management was associated with reduced risk of MI (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.73, P < 0.001) and urgent revascularization (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.98, P = 0.045). No significant differences were identified in the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and stroke. Among males, there was no significant association between the treatment strategy and primary or secondary endpoints.

Conclusion: An invasive strategy compared with a conservative strategy did not reduce the composite outcome of all-cause mortality or MI in older NSTEACS women at 1-year follow-up. An invasive strategy reduced the individual risk of MI and urgent revascularization. Our results support the beneficial role of the invasive strategy in older NSTEACS women.

Registration: This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023379819).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受侵入性或保守治疗的非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征老年妇女:个体患者数据荟萃分析
目的:研究急性冠状动脉综合征治疗策略的随机对照试验(RCTs)中,女性和老年患者的代表性不足。本研究旨在评估非st段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTEACS)老年妇女有创与保守治疗的获益。方法和结果:该分析来自个体患者数据荟萃分析,包括6项比较老年NSTEACS患者侵入性治疗与保守治疗的随机对照试验。主要终点是全因死亡率或心肌梗死(MI)的综合。次要终点包括全因死亡率、心血管死亡、心肌梗死、紧急血运重建术和卒中。随访时间为1年。共纳入717名女性[中位年龄84.0(四分位间距81.0-87.0)岁]。1年随访时,有创组的主要终点发生率为21.0%,保守组为27.8%[危险比(HR) 0.77, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.52-1.13,随机效应P = 0.160]。有创治疗与心肌梗死(HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.73, P < 0.001)和紧急血运重建术(HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.98, P = 0.045)的风险降低相关。在全因死亡率、心血管死亡和中风的风险方面没有发现显著差异。在男性中,治疗策略与主要或次要终点之间没有显著关联。结论:在1年的随访中,与保守策略相比,侵入性策略并没有降低老年NSTEACS女性的全因死亡率或心肌梗死的综合结果。有创策略降低了心肌梗死和紧急血运重建的个体风险。我们的结果支持侵入性策略在老年NSTEACS女性中的有益作用。注册:该荟萃分析已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023379819)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: The impact of high microvascular resistance on coronary wave energetics depends on coronary microvascular functionality. Factors associated with native heart survival and intermediate-term outcomes in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock. Gender, diversity, and inclusion in phenotypic and genetic characterization of acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of the prospective multicentre GEDI-ACS registry. Insulin resistance and metabolic health predict cardiorespiratory fitness: cohort study. One-month dual antiplatelet therapy after biodegradable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients at high bleeding risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1