Efficacy of local anesthesia with cryotherapy on teeth with molar incisal hypomineralization: a randomized control trial.

IF 1.2 Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.6.385
Faizal C Peedikayil, Soni Kottayi, Athira Aravind, Aswathi Sreedharan, Athul Ramesh
{"title":"Efficacy of local anesthesia with cryotherapy on teeth with molar incisal hypomineralization: a randomized control trial.","authors":"Faizal C Peedikayil, Soni Kottayi, Athira Aravind, Aswathi Sreedharan, Athul Ramesh","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.6.385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth hypersensitivity presents a significant clinical challenge in managing molar-incisal hypomineralization (MIH), potentially compromising the effectiveness of restorative treatments. Cryotherapy has emerged as a promising approach to reduce pain and inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of cryotherapy as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in reducing operative pain and sensitivity in patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A split-mouth randomized controlled trial was conducted in 28 patients with MIH of the right and left lower molars. ie, 56 teeth. Group (1) control group (n = 28) was administered an Inferior Alveolar Nerve block and group (2) was administered cryotherapy spray after the Inferior Alveolar Nerve block. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scales were used to compare intraoperative pain. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the significance across the study groups, and the chi-square test was used to compare success rates between the two groups; a value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For VAS scale, the mean value in Group A is 8.89 ± 0.79, whereas in Group B, the values are 4.71 ± 1.46. For the FLACC scale, Group A scores were 7.14 ± 1.04, and Group B scores were 4.48 ± 1.37. When intergroup values were compared, the FLACC and VAS scores were statistically significant at P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, applying cryotherapy to tooth surfaces following an Inferior Alveolar Nerve block effectively reduces pain and sensitivity in teeth affected by MIH.</p>","PeriodicalId":94330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"24 6","pages":"385-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.6.385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tooth hypersensitivity presents a significant clinical challenge in managing molar-incisal hypomineralization (MIH), potentially compromising the effectiveness of restorative treatments. Cryotherapy has emerged as a promising approach to reduce pain and inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of cryotherapy as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in reducing operative pain and sensitivity in patients.

Methods: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial was conducted in 28 patients with MIH of the right and left lower molars. ie, 56 teeth. Group (1) control group (n = 28) was administered an Inferior Alveolar Nerve block and group (2) was administered cryotherapy spray after the Inferior Alveolar Nerve block. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scales were used to compare intraoperative pain. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the significance across the study groups, and the chi-square test was used to compare success rates between the two groups; a value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: For VAS scale, the mean value in Group A is 8.89 ± 0.79, whereas in Group B, the values are 4.71 ± 1.46. For the FLACC scale, Group A scores were 7.14 ± 1.04, and Group B scores were 4.48 ± 1.37. When intergroup values were compared, the FLACC and VAS scores were statistically significant at P < 0.001.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, applying cryotherapy to tooth surfaces following an Inferior Alveolar Nerve block effectively reduces pain and sensitivity in teeth affected by MIH.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部麻醉联合冷冻治疗磨牙切牙低矿化的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
背景:牙齿过敏是处理磨牙-切牙低矿化(MIH)的一个重大临床挑战,可能会影响修复治疗的有效性。冷冻疗法已经成为一种很有前途的减轻疼痛和炎症的方法。本研究旨在评估和比较冷冻治疗作为辅助神经阻滞治疗在减轻患者手术疼痛和敏感性方面的效果。方法:对28例左右下磨牙MIH患者进行裂口随机对照试验。比如,56颗牙齿。组(1)对照组(n = 28)行下肺泡神经阻滞,组(2)在下肺泡神经阻滞后给予冷冻喷雾治疗。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰量表(FLACC)比较术中疼痛。采用Mann-Whitney U检验检验各研究组间的显著性,采用卡方检验比较两组间的成功率;小于0.05被认为是显著的。结果:VAS评分A组平均值为8.89±0.79,B组平均值为4.71±1.46。FLACC量表A组评分为7.14±1.04分,B组评分为4.48±1.37分。比较组间值时,FLACC和VAS评分差异有统计学意义,P < 0.001。结论:在本研究的局限性内,在下牙槽神经阻滞后对牙齿表面进行冷冻治疗可有效减少MIH影响牙齿的疼痛和敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complete recovery from chronic implant-induced paresthesia after implant removal: a case report. Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to local anesthetics for impacted third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A survey of dental treatment under general anesthesia at the Gyeongnam Dental Clinic Center for the Disabled in Korea. National trends in dental sedation and general anesthesia in Japan before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive epidemiological study using National Database Open Data Japan. Impact of preoperative audiovisual distraction on emergence agitation in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1