A comprehensive study on MDP effects: Microshear bond strength and fatigue resistance in 4YSZ ceramics.

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-644020246091
Lucas Saldanha da Rosa, Luiza Freitas Brum Souza, Gratcheva Falcão Chiapinotto, Telma de Souza Pires, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
{"title":"A comprehensive study on MDP effects: Microshear bond strength and fatigue resistance in 4YSZ ceramics.","authors":"Lucas Saldanha da Rosa, Luiza Freitas Brum Souza, Gratcheva Falcão Chiapinotto, Telma de Souza Pires, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira","doi":"10.1590/0103-644020246091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to assess the presence of MDP at various stages of the bonding procedure, enhance the adhesive and mechanical behavior of cemented zirconia ceramics. Fifty ceramic slices (15 × 15 × 2 mm) and 48 discs (Ø= 10 mm, 1 mm thickness) were prepared, sintered, air-abraded with aluminum oxide, and allocated considering: 1) microshear bond strength (µSBS) between ceramic slices and luting agent cylinders (height= 1 mm, Ø= 1.2 mm); 2) fatigue behavior, ceramic discs paired and bonded onto fiber-epoxy resin discs (Ø= 10 mm, 2.5 mm thickness), and then mechanically tested (cyclic loading, starting at 400N, with increments of 100N, until failure). Four experimental groups were defined: Universal Primer (MDP primer+non-MDP resin cement - RC), Universal Adhesive (MDP adhesive+non-MDP RC), Cement (no primer+MDP RC), and Primer+Cement (MDP primer + MDP RC). For both outcomes, half of the specimens were tested after 24 hours, and half after aging. Bond strength data was analyzed via two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests, while fatigue data went through Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox post hoc tests. Regarding µSBS, aging impaired adhesion only for the Primer+Cement group (p<0.001). Universal Primer and Universal Adhesive showed the highest bond strength (p<0.05). Despite that, fatigue data indicates no significant differences (p>0.05). In conclusion, systems with MDP-containing components associated with non-MDP resin cement demonstrated enhanced adhesive capability for zirconia restorations. Nevertheless, no differences in terms of mechanical reinforcement were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e246091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020246091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the presence of MDP at various stages of the bonding procedure, enhance the adhesive and mechanical behavior of cemented zirconia ceramics. Fifty ceramic slices (15 × 15 × 2 mm) and 48 discs (Ø= 10 mm, 1 mm thickness) were prepared, sintered, air-abraded with aluminum oxide, and allocated considering: 1) microshear bond strength (µSBS) between ceramic slices and luting agent cylinders (height= 1 mm, Ø= 1.2 mm); 2) fatigue behavior, ceramic discs paired and bonded onto fiber-epoxy resin discs (Ø= 10 mm, 2.5 mm thickness), and then mechanically tested (cyclic loading, starting at 400N, with increments of 100N, until failure). Four experimental groups were defined: Universal Primer (MDP primer+non-MDP resin cement - RC), Universal Adhesive (MDP adhesive+non-MDP RC), Cement (no primer+MDP RC), and Primer+Cement (MDP primer + MDP RC). For both outcomes, half of the specimens were tested after 24 hours, and half after aging. Bond strength data was analyzed via two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests, while fatigue data went through Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox post hoc tests. Regarding µSBS, aging impaired adhesion only for the Primer+Cement group (p<0.001). Universal Primer and Universal Adhesive showed the highest bond strength (p<0.05). Despite that, fatigue data indicates no significant differences (p>0.05). In conclusion, systems with MDP-containing components associated with non-MDP resin cement demonstrated enhanced adhesive capability for zirconia restorations. Nevertheless, no differences in terms of mechanical reinforcement were observed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MDP对4YSZ陶瓷微剪切粘结强度和抗疲劳性能的综合研究。
本研究的目的是评估MDP在粘合过程的各个阶段的存在,增强胶结氧化锆陶瓷的粘合和力学行为。制备了50片陶瓷片(15 × 15 × 2 mm)和48片陶瓷片(Ø= 10 mm,厚度1 mm),进行烧结,用氧化铝进行空气研磨,并根据以下因素进行分配:1)陶瓷片与润滑剂气缸(高度= 1 mm, Ø= 1.2 mm)之间的微剪切结合强度(µSBS);2)疲劳性能,陶瓷盘配对并粘接在纤维环氧树脂盘(Ø= 10 mm, 2.5 mm厚度)上,然后进行机械测试(循环加载,从400N开始,以100N为增量,直到失效)。实验分为四组:通用底漆(MDP底漆+非MDP树脂水泥- RC)、通用胶粘剂(MDP胶粘剂+非MDP树脂水泥)、水泥(无底漆+MDP树脂水泥)和底漆+水泥(MDP底漆+MDP树脂水泥)。对于这两种结果,一半的标本在24小时后进行测试,另一半在老化后进行测试。粘结强度数据通过双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行分析,而疲劳数据通过Kaplan-Meier和Mantel-Cox事后检验进行分析。对于µSBS,老化只影响Primer+Cement组的粘附性(p0.05)。综上所述,含有mdp成分的体系与非mdp树脂水泥相结合,可以增强氧化锆修复体的粘附能力。然而,在机械强化方面没有观察到差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synergistic Effects of Nanochitosan and Demineralized Dentin Matrix on Alveolar Bone Substitution. Mechanical behavior of endocrown vs. post-and-crown: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Salivary fluoride bioavailability after application of fluoride varnishes: A randomized clinical study. Synergistic effects of bioactive silica and fluoride in enamel protection and repair: an in vitro study. Voids and marginal gaps in oval-shaped root canals filled with calcium silicate-based sealers: Micro-CT study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1