ArchHypo: Managing Software Architecture Uncertainty Using Hypotheses Engineering

IF 5.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1109/TSE.2024.3520477
Kelson Silva;Jorge Melegati;Fabio Silveira;Xiaofeng Wang;Mauricio Ferreira;Eduardo Guerra
{"title":"ArchHypo: Managing Software Architecture Uncertainty Using Hypotheses Engineering","authors":"Kelson Silva;Jorge Melegati;Fabio Silveira;Xiaofeng Wang;Mauricio Ferreira;Eduardo Guerra","doi":"10.1109/TSE.2024.3520477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncertainty is present in software architecture decisions due to a lack of knowledge about the requirements and the solutions involved. However, this uncertainty is usually not made explicit, and decisions can be made based on unproven premises or false assumptions. This paper focuses on a technique called ArchHypo that uses hypotheses engineering to manage uncertainties related to software architecture. It proposes formulating a technical plan based on each hypothesis’ assessment, incorporating measures able to mitigate its impact and reduce uncertainty. To evaluate the proposed technique, this paper reports an application of the technique in a mission-critical project that faced several technical challenges. Conclusions were based on data extracted from the project documentation and a questionnaire answered by all team members. As a result, the application of ArchHypo provided a structured approach to dividing the architectural work through iterations, which facilitated architectural decision-making. However, further research is needed to fully understand its impact across different contexts. On the other hand, the team identified the learning curve and process adjustments required for ArchHypo's adoption as significant challenges that could hinder its widespread adoption. In conclusion, the evidence found in this study indicates that the technique has the potential to provide a suitable way to manage the uncertainties related to software architecture, facilitating the strategic postponement of decisions while addressing their potential impact.","PeriodicalId":13324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","volume":"51 2","pages":"430-448"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10807272","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10807272/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty is present in software architecture decisions due to a lack of knowledge about the requirements and the solutions involved. However, this uncertainty is usually not made explicit, and decisions can be made based on unproven premises or false assumptions. This paper focuses on a technique called ArchHypo that uses hypotheses engineering to manage uncertainties related to software architecture. It proposes formulating a technical plan based on each hypothesis’ assessment, incorporating measures able to mitigate its impact and reduce uncertainty. To evaluate the proposed technique, this paper reports an application of the technique in a mission-critical project that faced several technical challenges. Conclusions were based on data extracted from the project documentation and a questionnaire answered by all team members. As a result, the application of ArchHypo provided a structured approach to dividing the architectural work through iterations, which facilitated architectural decision-making. However, further research is needed to fully understand its impact across different contexts. On the other hand, the team identified the learning curve and process adjustments required for ArchHypo's adoption as significant challenges that could hinder its widespread adoption. In conclusion, the evidence found in this study indicates that the technique has the potential to provide a suitable way to manage the uncertainties related to software architecture, facilitating the strategic postponement of decisions while addressing their potential impact.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ArchHypo:使用假设工程管理软件架构的不确定性
由于缺乏对需求和所涉及的解决方案的了解,软件架构决策中存在不确定性。然而,这种不确定性通常是不明确的,决策可以基于未经证实的前提或错误的假设。本文关注的是一种叫做ArchHypo的技术,它使用假设工程来管理与软件架构相关的不确定性。它建议根据每个假设的评估制定一项技术计划,并纳入能够减轻其影响和减少不确定性的措施。为了评估所提出的技术,本文报告了该技术在面临几个技术挑战的关键任务项目中的应用。结论是基于从项目文档中提取的数据和所有团队成员回答的问卷调查。因此,ArchHypo的应用程序提供了一种结构化的方法,通过迭代来划分建筑工作,这促进了建筑决策。然而,需要进一步的研究来充分了解其在不同背景下的影响。另一方面,团队确定了ArchHypo采用所需的学习曲线和过程调整,这是可能阻碍其广泛采用的重大挑战。总之,在这项研究中发现的证据表明,该技术有潜力提供一种合适的方法来管理与软件体系结构相关的不确定性,促进决策的战略延迟,同时解决它们的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.80%
发文量
724
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering seeks contributions comprising well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies with potential impacts on software construction, analysis, or management. The scope of this Transactions extends from fundamental mechanisms to the development of principles and their application in specific environments. Specific topic areas include: a) Development and maintenance methods and models: Techniques and principles for specifying, designing, and implementing software systems, encompassing notations and process models. b) Assessment methods: Software tests, validation, reliability models, test and diagnosis procedures, software redundancy, design for error control, and measurements and evaluation of process and product aspects. c) Software project management: Productivity factors, cost models, schedule and organizational issues, and standards. d) Tools and environments: Specific tools, integrated tool environments, associated architectures, databases, and parallel and distributed processing issues. e) System issues: Hardware-software trade-offs. f) State-of-the-art surveys: Syntheses and comprehensive reviews of the historical development within specific areas of interest.
期刊最新文献
Are They All Good? Evaluating the Quality of CoTs in LLM-based Code Generation How Composite Metamorphic Relations Enhance Test Effectiveness of DNN Testing: An Empirical Study Unleashing the Potential of Coverage Representation in Deep Learning-Based Fault Localization CodeS+: Towards Assessing the Generalization Ability of Code Models Under Distribution Shift Can LLMs Generate User Stories and Assess Their Quality?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1