Models of symbol emergence in communication: a conceptual review and a guide for avoiding local minima

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1007/s10462-024-11048-y
Julian Zubek, Tomasz Korbak, Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi
{"title":"Models of symbol emergence in communication: a conceptual review and a guide for avoiding local minima","authors":"Julian Zubek,&nbsp;Tomasz Korbak,&nbsp;Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi","doi":"10.1007/s10462-024-11048-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>\n Computational simulations are a popular method for testing hypotheses about the emergence of symbolic communication. This kind of research is performed in a variety of traditions including language evolution, developmental psychology, cognitive science, artificial intelligence, and robotics. The motivations for the models are different, but the operationalisations and methods used are often similar. We identify the assumptions and explanatory targets of the most representative models and summarise the known results. We claim that some of the assumptions—such as portraying meaning in terms of mapping, focusing on the descriptive function of communication, and modelling signals with amodal tokens—may hinder the success of modelling. Relaxing these assumptions and foregrounding the interactions of embodied and situated agents allows one to systematise the multiplicity of pressures under which symbolic systems evolve. In line with this perspective, we sketch the road towards modelling the emergence of meaningful symbolic communication, where symbols are simultaneously grounded in action and perception and form an abstract system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-024-11048-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-11048-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational simulations are a popular method for testing hypotheses about the emergence of symbolic communication. This kind of research is performed in a variety of traditions including language evolution, developmental psychology, cognitive science, artificial intelligence, and robotics. The motivations for the models are different, but the operationalisations and methods used are often similar. We identify the assumptions and explanatory targets of the most representative models and summarise the known results. We claim that some of the assumptions—such as portraying meaning in terms of mapping, focusing on the descriptive function of communication, and modelling signals with amodal tokens—may hinder the success of modelling. Relaxing these assumptions and foregrounding the interactions of embodied and situated agents allows one to systematise the multiplicity of pressures under which symbolic systems evolve. In line with this perspective, we sketch the road towards modelling the emergence of meaningful symbolic communication, where symbols are simultaneously grounded in action and perception and form an abstract system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算模拟是测试有关符号交流出现的假设的一种流行方法。这类研究涉及语言进化、发展心理学、认知科学、人工智能和机器人学等多个领域。这些模型的动机各不相同,但所使用的操作和方法往往相似。我们确定了最具代表性模型的假设和解释目标,并总结了已知结果。我们认为,某些假设--如从映射的角度描绘意义、关注交流的描述功能以及用模态标记对信号进行建模--可能会阻碍建模的成功。放宽这些假设,强调具身和情景代理的互动,就能将符号系统演变过程中的多重压力系统化。根据这一观点,我们将勾勒出有意义的符号交流的建模之路,在这一过程中,符号同时立足于行动和感知,并形成一个抽象系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence for geometry-based feature extraction, analysis and synthesis in artistic images: a survey How the internet of things technology improves agricultural efficiency Models of symbol emergence in communication: a conceptual review and a guide for avoiding local minima Digital phenotypes and digital biomarkers for health and diseases: a systematic review of machine learning approaches utilizing passive non-invasive signals collected via wearable devices and smartphones A survey on deep learning-based automated essay scoring and feedback generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1