Random-positioned-sampling effect on probabilistic seismic demand modeling of modularized suspended buildings with free-standing objects and architectural function regioning

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4241
Zhihang Ye, Xuanting Liu
{"title":"Random-positioned-sampling effect on probabilistic seismic demand modeling of modularized suspended buildings with free-standing objects and architectural function regioning","authors":"Zhihang Ye,&nbsp;Xuanting Liu","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The definition of the targeted engineering demand parameters (EDPs) is important to probabilistic seismic demand modeling (PSDM), which produces probability density functions of EDPs conditioned on seismic intensity measure (IM). The targeted EDPs are usually defined at the group level to account for multiple components/units. Thus, they are affected by the considered range of units, i.e., the sample positions. For instance, the maximum peak floor acceleration (PFA) within the whole building differs from the maximum among only the important positions related to seismic loss. Additional uncertainties are induced in the PSDM of PFA if the sample positions vary when architectural function and non-structural elements change. In this study, the aforementioned influence is termed random-positioned-sampling (RPS) effect, and it is investigated by targeting a modularized suspended building, which features the tuning mechanism, multiple major modes, uneven response envelopes, and notable non-structural-object-structure interactions (NSOSI). Results show that the RPS effect lowers the maximum-based group-level EDP and increases the dispersion within the EDP sample sets, indicating that conventional PSDMs without considering the RPS effect are biased. The significance of the influence is positively correlated to the position-wise coefficient of variation of EDP but negatively correlated to the density of sample positions. The combined influence of the NSOSI and the RPS effect is two-sided for PSDM. The NSOSI amplifies the RPS effect via enlarging position-wise dispersion of EDP, whereas, the RPS effect waives part of the detrimental scattered contributions from NSOSI. Overall, the IM performance is handicapped, even with IM optimization. However, it can be compensated if architectural function region information is acquired beforehand since the sample positions are restrained.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 1","pages":"32-61"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The definition of the targeted engineering demand parameters (EDPs) is important to probabilistic seismic demand modeling (PSDM), which produces probability density functions of EDPs conditioned on seismic intensity measure (IM). The targeted EDPs are usually defined at the group level to account for multiple components/units. Thus, they are affected by the considered range of units, i.e., the sample positions. For instance, the maximum peak floor acceleration (PFA) within the whole building differs from the maximum among only the important positions related to seismic loss. Additional uncertainties are induced in the PSDM of PFA if the sample positions vary when architectural function and non-structural elements change. In this study, the aforementioned influence is termed random-positioned-sampling (RPS) effect, and it is investigated by targeting a modularized suspended building, which features the tuning mechanism, multiple major modes, uneven response envelopes, and notable non-structural-object-structure interactions (NSOSI). Results show that the RPS effect lowers the maximum-based group-level EDP and increases the dispersion within the EDP sample sets, indicating that conventional PSDMs without considering the RPS effect are biased. The significance of the influence is positively correlated to the position-wise coefficient of variation of EDP but negatively correlated to the density of sample positions. The combined influence of the NSOSI and the RPS effect is two-sided for PSDM. The NSOSI amplifies the RPS effect via enlarging position-wise dispersion of EDP, whereas, the RPS effect waives part of the detrimental scattered contributions from NSOSI. Overall, the IM performance is handicapped, even with IM optimization. However, it can be compensated if architectural function region information is acquired beforehand since the sample positions are restrained.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机定位抽样对独立构件模块化悬架建筑概率地震需求建模及建筑功能区划的影响
目标工程需求参数的定义对概率地震需求建模(PSDM)具有重要意义,该模型以地震烈度测度(IM)为条件,生成目标工程需求参数的概率密度函数。目标edp通常在组级定义,以考虑多个组件/单元。因此,它们受到所考虑的单位范围,即样本位置的影响。例如,整个建筑物内的最大峰值楼层加速度(PFA)仅在与地震损失有关的重要位置上与最大值不同。当建筑功能和非结构元素发生变化时,样品位置的变化会导致PFA的PSDM产生额外的不确定性。在本研究中,上述影响被称为随机定位抽样(RPS)效应,并以具有调谐机制、多主模态、不均匀响应包络和显著的非结构-物体-结构相互作用(NSOSI)的模块化悬架建筑为研究对象。结果表明,RPS效应降低了基于最大群体水平的EDP,增加了EDP样本集内的离散度,表明不考虑RPS效应的传统psdm是有偏差的。影响的显著性与EDP的位置变异系数正相关,而与样本位置密度负相关。NSOSI和RPS效应对PSDM的综合影响是双向的。NSOSI通过扩大EDP的位置分散而放大了RPS效应,而RPS效应则放弃了NSOSI的部分有害分散贡献。总的来说,即使对IM进行了优化,IM的性能也会受到限制。但是,由于样本位置的限制,如果事先获得了结构功能区域信息,则可以对其进行补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information A codifiable methodology for estimating pallet sliding displacements on steel racking systems Model reference adaptive hierarchical control framework for shake table tests Sensitivity of seismic fragility curves to multiple parameters using CyberShake simulated ground motions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1