Adoption and use of author identifier services: A French national survey

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1002/leap.1640
Christophe Boudry, Aline Bouchard
{"title":"Adoption and use of author identifier services: A French national survey","authors":"Christophe Boudry,&nbsp;Aline Bouchard","doi":"10.1002/leap.1640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper studies awareness and use of author identifier services (AIDs) in the French academic community and explores needs and forms of support required for these tools, using a national questionnaire survey. ArXivID, IdHAL, ORCID, ResearcherID and Scopus Author ID were investigated. A total of 6125 people completed the questionnaire in full. The results of this survey show that discipline and age play an important role in French researchers' familiarity with AIDs. IdHAL and ORCID were by far the two best known AIDs, probably because they have been promoted by institutions in France for several years. French researchers use AIDs mainly to respond to external requests (e.g., to submit an article or a research project), while, surprisingly, few use them to ‘facilitate their work’. When French researchers were asked about their needs and the form of support required for AIDs, more than 30% of them said they either required an introduction to or practical training in these tools. The results of this national survey should help stakeholders to adapt their policies and to guide and support researchers more efficiently in the use of these tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1640","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies awareness and use of author identifier services (AIDs) in the French academic community and explores needs and forms of support required for these tools, using a national questionnaire survey. ArXivID, IdHAL, ORCID, ResearcherID and Scopus Author ID were investigated. A total of 6125 people completed the questionnaire in full. The results of this survey show that discipline and age play an important role in French researchers' familiarity with AIDs. IdHAL and ORCID were by far the two best known AIDs, probably because they have been promoted by institutions in France for several years. French researchers use AIDs mainly to respond to external requests (e.g., to submit an article or a research project), while, surprisingly, few use them to ‘facilitate their work’. When French researchers were asked about their needs and the form of support required for AIDs, more than 30% of them said they either required an introduction to or practical training in these tools. The results of this national survey should help stakeholders to adapt their policies and to guide and support researchers more efficiently in the use of these tools.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作者标识服务的采用和使用:一项法国全国性调查
本文通过一项全国性问卷调查,研究了法国学术界对作者标识符服务(AIDs)的认识和使用情况,并探讨了这些工具的需求和所需的支持形式。调查对象包括 ArXivID、IdHAL、ORCID、ResearcherID 和 Scopus Author ID。共有 6125 人完整填写了问卷。调查结果表明,学科和年龄在法国研究人员对艾滋病的熟悉程度方面起着重要作用。到目前为止,IdHAL 和 ORCID 是最为人所知的两种 AID,这可能是因为它们已在法国的机构中推广了数年。法国研究人员使用 AIDs 主要是为了回应外部请求(如提交文章或研究项目),但令人惊讶的是,很少有人使用 AIDs 来 "促进自己的工作"。当法国研究人员被问及他们对 AIDs 的需求和所需的支持形式时,超过 30% 的研究人员表示,他们需要这些工具的介绍或实际培训。这项全国性调查的结果应有助于相关方调整政策,更有效地指导和支持研究人员使用这些工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Unravelling Citation Rules: A Comparative Analysis of Referencing Instruction Patterns in Scopus-Indexed Journals Questioning the Predator of the Predatory Journals: How Fair Are Global Publishing Standards? Small Is Sexy: Rethinking Article Length in the Age of AI “I Really Try to Model Good Practices”: Reflecting on Journal Article Publication From Mid-Career The Impact of Print-on-Demand on Spanish University Presses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1