Accidental gamblers: Risk and vulnerability in Vidarbha cotton by Sarthak Gaurav and Thiagu Ranganathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. pp. 497. £150 (hb) / $150 (e-book). ISBN: 9781108832298; ISBN: 9781009276597

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Agrarian Change Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1111/joac.12605
Silva Lieberherr
{"title":"Accidental gamblers: Risk and vulnerability in Vidarbha cotton by Sarthak Gaurav and Thiagu Ranganathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. pp. 497. £150 (hb) / $150 (e-book). ISBN: 9781108832298; ISBN: 9781009276597","authors":"Silva Lieberherr","doi":"10.1111/joac.12605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This book considers cotton cultivation as a farmer's ‘gamble with the rains and a gamble with the markets’ (p. 317). The authors analyse these gambles, the decisions that come with them and the structures that shape them through great empirical depth making it a highly relevant contribution. Vidarbha, a region in Central India and the focus of this book, is of particular interest regarding these gambles because of the region's extreme vulnerability to climate change.</p><p>It is perhaps the most fascinating characteristic of the book that the authors take the farmers seriously as cotton specialists (p. 4) who are well aware of the risky business they engage in. This is possible because both authors spent long periods in the field during several phases of fieldwork from 2008 to 2020, using the methodology of longitudinal study of villages. The so-called agrarian crisis, unfolding in India since the neoliberal reforms of the 1990s, serves as a backdrop of the book. Vidarbha is one of the epicentres of this crisis and became infamous for the farmer suicides that have swept the landscape—particularly, as the authors claim, in the cotton growing areas.</p><p>The authors do not disagree about the devastating impacts of the neoliberal reforms but show that agrarian distress in the region has been going on for longer. They start with a detailed and determined historical account of Vidarbha in particular, adding up to scarce (at least English) literature (see, e.g., Satya, <span>1997</span>). The historical review gives a detailed account of how Vidarbha became a ‘cotton frontier’ (p. 376) whereby ‘accidents’, events completely external from the perspective of a Vidarbha farmer, influenced the cotton economy and the structure in which the farmers' gambles have been taking place.</p><p>The book closely analyses the colonial takeover and the subsequent phenomenal rise in the area under cotton, when farmers started to grow for world markets, though still under a predominantly rain-fed environment. This, the authors argue, caused deforestation and increased water use and ‘rendered the population vulnerable to ecological and environmental degradation’ (p. 82). They also describe how the American Civil War as a major boost for cotton production generated unprecedented wealth for merchants and large landholders while peasants and agricultural labourers became even more vulnerable to food inflation and adverse income shocks.</p><p>Guarav and Ranganathan clearly show how these developments and the change in local institutions still shape today's agriculture in Vidarbha. For example, they highlight how forced commercialization resulted in the expansion of area on which cash crops are cultivated, in increased indebtedness and—together with the development of a land market—in land concentration. They describe how</p><p>However, the authors do not engage deeply with how this historical legacy influences the caste-class structure of the present.</p><p>The book then discusses how, in the early 20th century, farmers increasingly became reliant on purchased inputs for cotton, cultivation costs increased and debts were a constant problem. It is a pity that post-independence agriculture is discussed with much less detail, perhaps and correctly assuming that there is a lot of literature doing that (e.g., Gulati, <span>2002</span>, Ramachandran &amp; Rawal, <span>2010</span>, De Roy, <span>2017</span>, or Ramakumar <span>2022</span>). The authors do however make connections to the post-independence period, when they write that ‘real wages declined … to such an extent that late twentieth-century real wages were considered to be lower than those of the late sixteenth century’ (p. 41).</p><p>The authors dedicate an entire chapter on inputs in agriculture where they show, based on their dense data, how farmers routinely experiment with different crops, seeds, pesticides or agronomic practices. In particular, they provide a very detailed description of how farmers choose their crops and seeds and describe how marketing and sales strategies of input dealers and seed companies make it more difficult for farmers to make informed choices. For example, ‘ingenious seed brand names’ (p. 280) lure farmers into buying certain seeds. Consequently, farmers use ‘multiple seed brands as a “rule of thumb” in the absence of knowledge on what works and what does not’ (p. 277), instead of multiple trials of a single seed brand.</p><p>For the pesticides, the authors show how Vidarbha is in a pesticide treadmill and the costs are rising. Even banned pesticides (like monocrotophos) are widely used, leading to a high number of pesticide poisonings. At the same time, alternative non-pesticidal management methods are not widespread. The authors seem to uncritically endorse zero budget natural farming (ZBNF) here, an agricultural production system professed to work without chemical inputs. The book does not discuss the many questions regarding ZBNF's efficacy as well as its uncanny misuse towards furthering the cultural politics of the current dispensation ruling India.\n1</p><p>A particularly relevant case in point is Bt-cotton, which is near universal in Vidarbha as farmers enthusiastically adopted it. Net returns grew steadily until 2017, but in 2018, the yields decreased dramatically due to the pink bollworm outbreaks. Through all the years of study, however, cotton returned the highest income compared to all crops, and therefore, farmers stayed with Bt-cotton. Interestingly, the authors discuss the rise in (illegal) herbicide tolerant Bt seeds. Farmers express the belief that these seeds would solve the arising problems with pest outbreaks and yields but show a limited understanding of what these seeds are exactly, a symptom, the authors write, of the deskilling of farmers.</p><p>While the real costs of cultivation increased sharply, the real prices of cotton did not go up much in the period of this study (2008–2020) and the real incomes were stagnant. The situation is particularly dire for farmers on rain-fed lands without groundwater-based irrigation. On average, about one in ten households earned a revenue less than the costs, that is, incurred losses, more likely those with less capital in the form of land.</p><p>Gaurav and Ranganathan then come to the part of the book where it all started for them thematically: to show all the aspects of farmers' decision making, risk hedging and risk taking. Empirically, they show that the cycle of debt is indeed a vicious cycle, but not always for the same households. It is landholding and class that determine who goes into it and comes out of it while some other households then enter this debt cycle. The authors argue that ‘on an average, households experiencing yield shocks in 2015 were able to recover and even surpass the incomes of those who did not experience these shocks over a short span of five years’ (p. 358). It is an interesting argument that the farmers might just stick with cotton because of its variability rather than despite of it. ‘Some like the thrill’ (p. 6), one cotton farmer is quoted. However, the interconnected nature of land, class and risk-mitigation abilities ensures that households with small and marginal landholdings may sometimes never come out of it.</p><p>The authors describe in detail how the farmers undertake risk hedging in creative ways and how their opportunities to do so depend on the size of their landholding and gender. Ex ante risk hedging includes crop diversification, intercropping and other adaption practices of cultivator households. Mainly, farmers experiment with a variety of crops. Here, soybean has become the second important cash crop in the region, but with declining importance as its promises for farmers have been thwarted by recurring poor yields. In a different function, red gram can be an effective hedge and source of nutrition, considering that sorghum has declined massively affecting food security and livestock rearing.</p><p>Ex post risk coping mechanisms include labour market adjustments such as diversification outside of agriculture, borrowing, asset sales and a reliance on formal and informal insurance arrangements. The book describes diversification out of agriculture as an ex post coping mechanism coming into play in times when incomes are low and distress is high. Interestingly, farmers ‘do not acknowledge crop insurance or weather insurance as a risk coping mechanism’ (p. 351), mostly because of poor experiences in the past and a failure of insurance markets.</p><p>Gaurav and Ranganathan show that vulnerability is ‘asymmetrically borne by the small and marginal farmers, and women in the household’ (p. 358). Landless and marginal cultivator households ‘have limited financial strength to cope with idiosyncratic and covariate shocks compared to those with the means to cope with the same’ (p. 347). This is an important finding because it puts into perspective an earlier finding, namely that wages increased as the interaction between farmers and agricultural labourers changed considerably, for example, with rising opportunity cost for farm labourers.</p><p>Here, the authors emphasize how particularly non-cultivator households rely on the Public Distribution System (PDS) for food security. On several occasions, the authors show the crucial role of the state for all households. The government frequently issues debt waivers and relief ‘packages’ to cushion shocks. Despite these ‘packages’ being politically motivated in many cases, they do serve as a ‘lifeline to the beneficiaries’ (p. 356) empirically.</p><p>Another arena of state intervention is the pricing, crucial as ‘downside price risk is perceived as the most critical risk factor’ (p. 358). The authors describe the different measures of the state and how they have been dismantled or weakened again. The most interesting part is where the authors describe how selling and price-making in local market yards actually takes place. For example, the farmers lose their bargaining power and rely on middlemen from the moment they enter the yard as the auctioning processes can be chaotic causing a very high and not necessarily justified price variability. The authors show that the activity of the public procurement system has been highly variable during the period of the study, but that officials from the public Cotton Corporation of India played an important role in the market yards intervening to support the minimum prices.</p><p>The book shows how the vulnerability of households has worsened by the end of the study period in 2020 as land sizes have fallen and Bt-cotton yields have declined. Data indicate that households in the sample are substantially indebted, and the authors give a fine-grained picture of how and why. Households with a lower asset base are more vulnerable to relying on high-cost non-institutional credit. For all groups though, the authors emphasize that ‘informal credit from kinship network, that is, friends and relatives was common’ (p. 200) and that ‘the informal ties are a much-needed lifeline during financial hardship’ (p. 201).</p><p>This is highly interesting. It is a pity, however, that the authors pay very little attention to what these findings in particular mean in terms of caste. In an Indian context, access to such networks are, in almost all cases I assume, determined or at least strongly influenced by one's caste. Gaurav and Ranganathan do touch the question when they write that ‘so far as representation of SCs [scheduled caste] and STs [scheduled tribe] is higher among the landless households relative to other caste groups in the villages, their vulnerability and risk coping strategies are of immense significance’ (p. 359), but the authors do not elaborate much.</p><p>The lack of engagement with caste as a social reality is perhaps linked with the conceptual perspective of the book that is comfortably placed in some sort of a modified neoclassical view of farmers as efficient actors. Within this framework of methodological individualism, the authors produce remarkable insights and great analytical narratives on the perspectives of farmers and their decision making. This framework is, precisely, what makes the book so rich while it seems to preclude the authors to engage more deeply with social embeddedness of individuals in social structures like caste or class. Already Ambedkar (<span>1917</span>) wrote that</p><p>Class and caste then greatly influence an individual's choices and options within the gamble of Vidarbhan cotton farming.</p><p>The book also asks why Vidarbha farmers do not become more politically active. The authors state that the Vidarbha farmers failed to form politically relevant alliances to protect the ‘interest of the agrarian communities of the region’ (p. 360) and get a larger share of resources for Vidarbha, a region with a considerable developmental backlog. While the book does show inner-village economic inequalities in many instances, they seem to gloss them over too easily as a reason when they argue that ‘the disconnect among the farming communities was bolstered by the process of mass consumerism that distorted collective identity of the village, and individualism and competitiveness became the norm’ (p. 400). In the concluding part, they also indirectly blame caste as a factor for breaking farmers and regional solidarities. Frankly speaking, this Gandhian notion of a unified village community that has been overrun by the ideologies and institutions of the market has been challenged quite thoroughly in sociology and other disciplines, and its presence in the book is uncanny to say the least.</p><p>Nevertheless, the book ends with a conclusion that focuses very much on suggestions on how to improve the situation, and for this, the authors are to be commended. This part of the book is based strongly on its empirical findings and therefore particularly valuable and relevant. To name a few, the authors call for seed sovereignty and for more research on locally adapted seeds, for public investment in irrigation and a revival of traditional community-based water management systems. In terms of credit market, the authors say that the ‘question of sustainable agricultural credit in a high-risk environment continues to be unanswered’ (p. 394) and that credit and insurance might need to be bundled for insurances to pick up.</p><p>What is missing though are more structural suggestions. While the authors give a very insightful understanding into how local institutions developed and how price uncertainty actually presents itself to the farmers, any suggestions on how to restructure price and agriculture are lacking. It is easily forgiven as the book is focused on Vidarbha, and the policy suggestions are, implicitly, addressed to people who might have power in the region but not in India as a nation state or beyond. It is still an interesting gap to reflect on what histories of cotton cultivation have taught us with regard to what structures of means of production or what organization of agriculture would benefit (which) Vidarbha farmers.</p><p>This book is a highly valuable contribution, making thought-provoking conclusions based on an impressive body of data. That Gaurav and Ranganathan also extensively wrote about how historical ‘accidents’ and economic and political structures and institutions shaped cotton cultivation makes it a particularly significant read. The authors' passion for the cotton cultivators in Vidarbha allows the reader to understand the farmers' decision-making, their risk hedging and vulnerabilities in fine-grained detail, including their hopes and desperations. These aid towards a deeper understanding of how rain-fed and groundwater-based agriculture might develop in the hotspots of the climate crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.12605","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agrarian Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.12605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This book considers cotton cultivation as a farmer's ‘gamble with the rains and a gamble with the markets’ (p. 317). The authors analyse these gambles, the decisions that come with them and the structures that shape them through great empirical depth making it a highly relevant contribution. Vidarbha, a region in Central India and the focus of this book, is of particular interest regarding these gambles because of the region's extreme vulnerability to climate change.

It is perhaps the most fascinating characteristic of the book that the authors take the farmers seriously as cotton specialists (p. 4) who are well aware of the risky business they engage in. This is possible because both authors spent long periods in the field during several phases of fieldwork from 2008 to 2020, using the methodology of longitudinal study of villages. The so-called agrarian crisis, unfolding in India since the neoliberal reforms of the 1990s, serves as a backdrop of the book. Vidarbha is one of the epicentres of this crisis and became infamous for the farmer suicides that have swept the landscape—particularly, as the authors claim, in the cotton growing areas.

The authors do not disagree about the devastating impacts of the neoliberal reforms but show that agrarian distress in the region has been going on for longer. They start with a detailed and determined historical account of Vidarbha in particular, adding up to scarce (at least English) literature (see, e.g., Satya, 1997). The historical review gives a detailed account of how Vidarbha became a ‘cotton frontier’ (p. 376) whereby ‘accidents’, events completely external from the perspective of a Vidarbha farmer, influenced the cotton economy and the structure in which the farmers' gambles have been taking place.

The book closely analyses the colonial takeover and the subsequent phenomenal rise in the area under cotton, when farmers started to grow for world markets, though still under a predominantly rain-fed environment. This, the authors argue, caused deforestation and increased water use and ‘rendered the population vulnerable to ecological and environmental degradation’ (p. 82). They also describe how the American Civil War as a major boost for cotton production generated unprecedented wealth for merchants and large landholders while peasants and agricultural labourers became even more vulnerable to food inflation and adverse income shocks.

Guarav and Ranganathan clearly show how these developments and the change in local institutions still shape today's agriculture in Vidarbha. For example, they highlight how forced commercialization resulted in the expansion of area on which cash crops are cultivated, in increased indebtedness and—together with the development of a land market—in land concentration. They describe how

However, the authors do not engage deeply with how this historical legacy influences the caste-class structure of the present.

The book then discusses how, in the early 20th century, farmers increasingly became reliant on purchased inputs for cotton, cultivation costs increased and debts were a constant problem. It is a pity that post-independence agriculture is discussed with much less detail, perhaps and correctly assuming that there is a lot of literature doing that (e.g., Gulati, 2002, Ramachandran & Rawal, 2010, De Roy, 2017, or Ramakumar 2022). The authors do however make connections to the post-independence period, when they write that ‘real wages declined … to such an extent that late twentieth-century real wages were considered to be lower than those of the late sixteenth century’ (p. 41).

The authors dedicate an entire chapter on inputs in agriculture where they show, based on their dense data, how farmers routinely experiment with different crops, seeds, pesticides or agronomic practices. In particular, they provide a very detailed description of how farmers choose their crops and seeds and describe how marketing and sales strategies of input dealers and seed companies make it more difficult for farmers to make informed choices. For example, ‘ingenious seed brand names’ (p. 280) lure farmers into buying certain seeds. Consequently, farmers use ‘multiple seed brands as a “rule of thumb” in the absence of knowledge on what works and what does not’ (p. 277), instead of multiple trials of a single seed brand.

For the pesticides, the authors show how Vidarbha is in a pesticide treadmill and the costs are rising. Even banned pesticides (like monocrotophos) are widely used, leading to a high number of pesticide poisonings. At the same time, alternative non-pesticidal management methods are not widespread. The authors seem to uncritically endorse zero budget natural farming (ZBNF) here, an agricultural production system professed to work without chemical inputs. The book does not discuss the many questions regarding ZBNF's efficacy as well as its uncanny misuse towards furthering the cultural politics of the current dispensation ruling India. 1

A particularly relevant case in point is Bt-cotton, which is near universal in Vidarbha as farmers enthusiastically adopted it. Net returns grew steadily until 2017, but in 2018, the yields decreased dramatically due to the pink bollworm outbreaks. Through all the years of study, however, cotton returned the highest income compared to all crops, and therefore, farmers stayed with Bt-cotton. Interestingly, the authors discuss the rise in (illegal) herbicide tolerant Bt seeds. Farmers express the belief that these seeds would solve the arising problems with pest outbreaks and yields but show a limited understanding of what these seeds are exactly, a symptom, the authors write, of the deskilling of farmers.

While the real costs of cultivation increased sharply, the real prices of cotton did not go up much in the period of this study (2008–2020) and the real incomes were stagnant. The situation is particularly dire for farmers on rain-fed lands without groundwater-based irrigation. On average, about one in ten households earned a revenue less than the costs, that is, incurred losses, more likely those with less capital in the form of land.

Gaurav and Ranganathan then come to the part of the book where it all started for them thematically: to show all the aspects of farmers' decision making, risk hedging and risk taking. Empirically, they show that the cycle of debt is indeed a vicious cycle, but not always for the same households. It is landholding and class that determine who goes into it and comes out of it while some other households then enter this debt cycle. The authors argue that ‘on an average, households experiencing yield shocks in 2015 were able to recover and even surpass the incomes of those who did not experience these shocks over a short span of five years’ (p. 358). It is an interesting argument that the farmers might just stick with cotton because of its variability rather than despite of it. ‘Some like the thrill’ (p. 6), one cotton farmer is quoted. However, the interconnected nature of land, class and risk-mitigation abilities ensures that households with small and marginal landholdings may sometimes never come out of it.

The authors describe in detail how the farmers undertake risk hedging in creative ways and how their opportunities to do so depend on the size of their landholding and gender. Ex ante risk hedging includes crop diversification, intercropping and other adaption practices of cultivator households. Mainly, farmers experiment with a variety of crops. Here, soybean has become the second important cash crop in the region, but with declining importance as its promises for farmers have been thwarted by recurring poor yields. In a different function, red gram can be an effective hedge and source of nutrition, considering that sorghum has declined massively affecting food security and livestock rearing.

Ex post risk coping mechanisms include labour market adjustments such as diversification outside of agriculture, borrowing, asset sales and a reliance on formal and informal insurance arrangements. The book describes diversification out of agriculture as an ex post coping mechanism coming into play in times when incomes are low and distress is high. Interestingly, farmers ‘do not acknowledge crop insurance or weather insurance as a risk coping mechanism’ (p. 351), mostly because of poor experiences in the past and a failure of insurance markets.

Gaurav and Ranganathan show that vulnerability is ‘asymmetrically borne by the small and marginal farmers, and women in the household’ (p. 358). Landless and marginal cultivator households ‘have limited financial strength to cope with idiosyncratic and covariate shocks compared to those with the means to cope with the same’ (p. 347). This is an important finding because it puts into perspective an earlier finding, namely that wages increased as the interaction between farmers and agricultural labourers changed considerably, for example, with rising opportunity cost for farm labourers.

Here, the authors emphasize how particularly non-cultivator households rely on the Public Distribution System (PDS) for food security. On several occasions, the authors show the crucial role of the state for all households. The government frequently issues debt waivers and relief ‘packages’ to cushion shocks. Despite these ‘packages’ being politically motivated in many cases, they do serve as a ‘lifeline to the beneficiaries’ (p. 356) empirically.

Another arena of state intervention is the pricing, crucial as ‘downside price risk is perceived as the most critical risk factor’ (p. 358). The authors describe the different measures of the state and how they have been dismantled or weakened again. The most interesting part is where the authors describe how selling and price-making in local market yards actually takes place. For example, the farmers lose their bargaining power and rely on middlemen from the moment they enter the yard as the auctioning processes can be chaotic causing a very high and not necessarily justified price variability. The authors show that the activity of the public procurement system has been highly variable during the period of the study, but that officials from the public Cotton Corporation of India played an important role in the market yards intervening to support the minimum prices.

The book shows how the vulnerability of households has worsened by the end of the study period in 2020 as land sizes have fallen and Bt-cotton yields have declined. Data indicate that households in the sample are substantially indebted, and the authors give a fine-grained picture of how and why. Households with a lower asset base are more vulnerable to relying on high-cost non-institutional credit. For all groups though, the authors emphasize that ‘informal credit from kinship network, that is, friends and relatives was common’ (p. 200) and that ‘the informal ties are a much-needed lifeline during financial hardship’ (p. 201).

This is highly interesting. It is a pity, however, that the authors pay very little attention to what these findings in particular mean in terms of caste. In an Indian context, access to such networks are, in almost all cases I assume, determined or at least strongly influenced by one's caste. Gaurav and Ranganathan do touch the question when they write that ‘so far as representation of SCs [scheduled caste] and STs [scheduled tribe] is higher among the landless households relative to other caste groups in the villages, their vulnerability and risk coping strategies are of immense significance’ (p. 359), but the authors do not elaborate much.

The lack of engagement with caste as a social reality is perhaps linked with the conceptual perspective of the book that is comfortably placed in some sort of a modified neoclassical view of farmers as efficient actors. Within this framework of methodological individualism, the authors produce remarkable insights and great analytical narratives on the perspectives of farmers and their decision making. This framework is, precisely, what makes the book so rich while it seems to preclude the authors to engage more deeply with social embeddedness of individuals in social structures like caste or class. Already Ambedkar (1917) wrote that

Class and caste then greatly influence an individual's choices and options within the gamble of Vidarbhan cotton farming.

The book also asks why Vidarbha farmers do not become more politically active. The authors state that the Vidarbha farmers failed to form politically relevant alliances to protect the ‘interest of the agrarian communities of the region’ (p. 360) and get a larger share of resources for Vidarbha, a region with a considerable developmental backlog. While the book does show inner-village economic inequalities in many instances, they seem to gloss them over too easily as a reason when they argue that ‘the disconnect among the farming communities was bolstered by the process of mass consumerism that distorted collective identity of the village, and individualism and competitiveness became the norm’ (p. 400). In the concluding part, they also indirectly blame caste as a factor for breaking farmers and regional solidarities. Frankly speaking, this Gandhian notion of a unified village community that has been overrun by the ideologies and institutions of the market has been challenged quite thoroughly in sociology and other disciplines, and its presence in the book is uncanny to say the least.

Nevertheless, the book ends with a conclusion that focuses very much on suggestions on how to improve the situation, and for this, the authors are to be commended. This part of the book is based strongly on its empirical findings and therefore particularly valuable and relevant. To name a few, the authors call for seed sovereignty and for more research on locally adapted seeds, for public investment in irrigation and a revival of traditional community-based water management systems. In terms of credit market, the authors say that the ‘question of sustainable agricultural credit in a high-risk environment continues to be unanswered’ (p. 394) and that credit and insurance might need to be bundled for insurances to pick up.

What is missing though are more structural suggestions. While the authors give a very insightful understanding into how local institutions developed and how price uncertainty actually presents itself to the farmers, any suggestions on how to restructure price and agriculture are lacking. It is easily forgiven as the book is focused on Vidarbha, and the policy suggestions are, implicitly, addressed to people who might have power in the region but not in India as a nation state or beyond. It is still an interesting gap to reflect on what histories of cotton cultivation have taught us with regard to what structures of means of production or what organization of agriculture would benefit (which) Vidarbha farmers.

This book is a highly valuable contribution, making thought-provoking conclusions based on an impressive body of data. That Gaurav and Ranganathan also extensively wrote about how historical ‘accidents’ and economic and political structures and institutions shaped cotton cultivation makes it a particularly significant read. The authors' passion for the cotton cultivators in Vidarbha allows the reader to understand the farmers' decision-making, their risk hedging and vulnerabilities in fine-grained detail, including their hopes and desperations. These aid towards a deeper understanding of how rain-fed and groundwater-based agriculture might develop in the hotspots of the climate crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《意外赌徒:Vidarbha棉花的风险与脆弱性》作者:Sarthak Gaurav和Thiagu Ranganathan。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2023。497页。150英镑(纸质书)/ 150美元(电子书)。ISBN: 9781108832298;ISBN: 9781009276597
这本书认为种植棉花是农民“拿雨水和市场赌博”(第317页)。作者分析了这些赌博、随之而来的决策和塑造它们的结构,通过大量的经验深度使其成为高度相关的贡献。Vidarbha是印度中部的一个地区,也是本书的重点,由于该地区极易受到气候变化的影响,因此对这些赌博特别感兴趣。也许这本书最吸引人的特点是,作者把农民当作棉花专家认真对待(第4页),他们很清楚自己从事的是有风险的生意。这是可能的,因为两位作者在2008年至2020年的几个阶段的实地工作中都花了很长时间,使用了农村纵向研究的方法。自20世纪90年代新自由主义改革以来在印度展开的所谓的土地危机,是这本书的背景。Vidarbha是这场危机的震中之一,并因农民自杀事件而臭名昭著,这些自杀事件席卷了整个地区——正如作者所说,尤其是在棉花种植区。作者对新自由主义改革的破坏性影响没有异议,但表明该地区的农业困境已经持续了更长时间。他们从详细而确定的维达尔巴的历史叙述开始,特别是,增加了稀缺的(至少是英语)文献(参见,例如,Satya, 1997)。历史回顾详细描述了Vidarbha如何成为“棉花前沿”(第376页),从Vidarbha农民的角度来看,“事故”,完全外部的事件,影响了棉花经济和农民赌博发生的结构。这本书仔细分析了殖民统治和随后棉花种植面积的惊人增长,当时农民们开始为世界市场种植棉花,尽管仍处于以雨养为主的环境中。作者认为,这导致了森林砍伐和水资源使用的增加,并“使人口容易受到生态和环境退化的影响”(第82页)。他们还描述了美国内战如何作为棉花生产的主要推动力,为商人和大地主创造了前所未有的财富,而农民和农业劳动者则更容易受到食品通胀和不利收入冲击的影响。Guarav和Ranganathan清楚地表明,这些发展和地方机构的变化仍然影响着维达尔巴今天的农业。例如,它们强调了强制商业化如何导致经济作物种植面积的扩大、债务的增加以及土地市场的发展——土地集中。然而,作者并没有深入探讨这一历史遗产如何影响当今的种姓阶级结构。书中还讨论了在20世纪初,农民如何越来越依赖购买的棉花投入物,种植成本增加,债务成为一个持续存在的问题。遗憾的是,独立后农业的讨论细节要少得多,也许正确地假设有很多文献做了这一点(例如,Gulati, 2002, Ramachandran &amp;Rawal, 2010, De Roy, 2017,或Ramakumar, 2022)。然而,作者确实将其与独立后的时期联系起来,他们写道,“实际工资下降……以至于20世纪后期的实际工资被认为低于16世纪后期的实际工资”(第41页)。作者用了整整一章的篇幅来讨论农业投入,根据他们的密集数据,他们展示了农民如何常规地试验不同的作物、种子、杀虫剂或农艺实践。特别是,它们非常详细地描述了农民如何选择作物和种子,并描述了投入物经销商和种子公司的营销和销售策略如何使农民更难做出明智的选择。例如,“巧妙的种子品牌名称”(第280页)诱使农民购买某些种子。因此,农民使用“多种种子品牌作为‘经验法则’,因为他们不知道什么有效,什么无效”(第277页),而不是对单一种子品牌进行多次试验。对于农药,作者展示了Vidarbha是如何在农药跑步机中运行的,并且成本正在上升。即使是被禁用的农药(如单效磷)也被广泛使用,导致大量农药中毒。与此同时,替代的非农药管理方法并不普遍。作者似乎不加批判地支持零预算自然农业(ZBNF),这是一种声称不需要化学投入的农业生产系统。这本书没有讨论关于ZBNF功效的许多问题,也没有讨论它对当前统治印度的制度的文化政治的不可思议的误用。 一个特别相关的例子是bt棉花,由于农民们热情地采用,这种棉花在Vidarbha几乎是普遍的。在2017年之前,净收益稳步增长,但在2018年,由于粉红棉铃虫的爆发,产量急剧下降。然而,经过多年的研究,与所有作物相比,棉花的回报是最高的,因此,农民们继续种植bt棉花。有趣的是,作者讨论了(非法)抗除草剂Bt种子的增加。这组作者写道,农民们相信这些种子将解决虫害爆发和产量方面出现的问题,但他们对这些种子究竟是什么理解有限,这是农民缺乏技能的一个症状。虽然实际种植成本急剧上升,但在本研究期间(2008-2020年),棉花的实际价格并未上涨太多,实际收入停滞不前。对于没有地下水灌溉的雨养土地上的农民来说,情况尤其糟糕。平均而言,大约十分之一的家庭收入低于成本,也就是说,蒙受了损失,更有可能是那些拥有较少土地资本的家庭。然后,高拉夫和兰加纳坦来到书中主题的起始部分:展示农民决策、风险对冲和风险承担的所有方面。经验表明,债务周期确实是一个恶性循环,但并不总是针对同一家庭。土地持有和阶级决定了谁进入和离开,而其他一些家庭则进入这个债务周期。作者认为,“平均而言,在2015年经历收益冲击的家庭能够在短短五年的时间内恢复甚至超过那些没有经历这些冲击的家庭的收入”(第358页)。这是一个有趣的论点,农民可能只是坚持种植棉花,因为它的可变性,而不是尽管它。“有些人喜欢这种刺激”(第6页),一位棉农如是说。然而,土地、阶级和减轻风险能力的相互关联性质确保了拥有少量和边际土地的家庭有时可能永远无法摆脱这种状况。作者详细描述了农民如何以创造性的方式进行风险对冲,以及他们这样做的机会如何取决于他们的土地持有规模和性别。事前风险对冲包括作物多样化、间作和农户的其他适应性做法。主要是农民试验各种作物。在这里,大豆已成为该地区第二大重要经济作物,但其重要性正在下降,因为它对农民的承诺一直受到持续低产量的阻碍。考虑到高粱产量大幅下降对粮食安全和牲畜饲养造成的影响,红克还可以作为一种有效的屏障和营养来源。事后风险应对机制包括劳动力市场调整,如农业以外的多样化、借贷、资产出售以及对正式和非正式保险安排的依赖。这本书将农业以外的多样化描述为在收入低、痛苦高的时候发挥作用的一种事后应对机制。有趣的是,农民“不承认作物保险或天气保险是一种风险应对机制”(第351页),这主要是因为过去的糟糕经验和保险市场的失败。Gaurav和Ranganathan表明,脆弱性“不对称地由小农和边缘农民以及家庭中的妇女承担”(第358页)。无地农户和边缘农户“与那些有办法应对特殊和协变量冲击的农户相比,他们的经济实力有限”(第347页)。这是一个重要的发现,因为它对早期的发现有了正确的认识,即随着农民和农业劳动者之间的相互作用发生很大变化,例如,随着农业劳动者的机会成本上升,工资也会增加。在这里,作者强调了非耕种家庭如何特别依赖公共分配系统(PDS)来获得粮食安全。在几个场合,作者展示了国家对所有家庭的关键作用。政府经常发布债务减免和救助“一揽子计划”来缓冲冲击。尽管这些“一揽子计划”在许多情况下是出于政治动机,但从经验来看,它们确实是“受益者的生命线”(第356页)。国家干预的另一个领域是定价,这一点至关重要,因为“价格下行风险被认为是最关键的风险因素”(第358页)。作者描述了国家的不同措施,以及它们是如何被拆除或再次削弱的。最有趣的部分是作者描述了当地市场的销售和定价是如何发生的。 例如,农民失去了议价能力,从他们进入院子的那一刻起就依赖中间商,因为拍卖过程可能会混乱,导致价格波动非常大,但不一定合理。作者表明,在研究期间,公共采购系统的活动变化很大,但印度国营棉花公司的官员在市场码干预中发挥了重要作用,以支持最低价格。这本书显示,到2020年研究期结束时,随着土地面积下降和bt棉花产量下降,家庭的脆弱性如何恶化。数据表明,样本中的家庭大量负债,作者详细描述了如何以及为什么负债。资产基础较低的家庭更容易依赖高成本的非机构信贷。然而,作者强调,对于所有群体来说,“来自亲属网络,即朋友和亲戚的非正式信用是常见的”(第200页),“非正式关系是经济困难时期急需的生命线”(第201页)。这非常有趣。然而,令人遗憾的是,作者很少关注这些发现在种姓方面的具体含义。在印度的背景下,我认为,在几乎所有情况下,进入这种网络是由一个人的种姓决定的,或者至少是受到种姓的强烈影响。Gaurav和Ranganathan确实触及了这个问题,他们写道:“迄今为止,在无地家庭中,SCs(表列种姓)和STs(表列部落)的代表比例相对于村庄中的其他种姓群体更高,他们的脆弱性和应对风险的策略具有巨大的意义”(第359页),但作者没有详细说明。将种姓作为一种社会现实的缺失或许与本书的概念视角有关,这种观点被舒适地置于某种改良的新古典主义观点中,即农民是有效的行动者。在方法论个人主义的框架内,作者对农民及其决策的观点产生了非凡的见解和出色的分析叙述。正是这个框架使得这本书如此丰富,但它似乎阻碍了作者更深入地研究个人在种姓或阶级等社会结构中的社会嵌入性。Ambedkar(1917)已经写道,阶级和种姓在维达尔邦棉花种植的赌博中极大地影响了个人的选择和选择。这本书还问了为什么维达尔巴的农民没有在政治上变得更加活跃。作者指出,Vidarbha农民未能形成政治上相关的联盟,以保护“该地区农业社区的利益”(第360页),并为Vidarbha获得更大的资源份额,该地区有相当大的发展积压。虽然这本书在许多情况下确实显示了村庄内部的经济不平等,但当他们认为“大规模消费主义扭曲了村庄的集体身份,个人主义和竞争成为常态,农业社区之间的脱节得到了加强”时,他们似乎太容易掩盖了这一点。在结语部分,他们还间接指责种姓是破坏农民和地区团结的一个因素。坦率地说,甘地关于一个统一的村庄社区的概念已经被市场的意识形态和制度所超越,这在社会学和其他学科中受到了相当彻底的挑战,它在书中的出现至少可以说是不可思议的。尽管如此,这本书的结尾还是着重提出了如何改善这种状况的建议,这一点值得赞扬。这本书的这一部分是基于强烈的实证研究结果,因此特别有价值和相关。这组作者呼吁建立种子主权,对适合当地的种子进行更多的研究,对灌溉进行公共投资,以及复兴传统的以社区为基础的水管理系统。在信贷市场方面,作者说,“在高风险环境中可持续农业信贷的问题仍然没有得到解答”(第394页),信贷和保险可能需要捆绑在一起,以获得保险。然而,缺少的是更多的结构性建议。虽然作者对地方制度如何发展以及价格不确定性如何实际呈现在农民身上给出了非常深刻的理解,但对于如何调整价格和农业结构却缺乏任何建议。这很容易被原谅,因为这本书关注的是维达尔巴,而且这些政策建议含蓄地针对的是那些可能在该地区拥有权力的人,而不是在印度这个民族国家或其他地方。 棉花种植的历史告诉我们,什么样的生产资料结构或什么样的农业组织将使维达尔巴农民受益,这仍然是一个有趣的空白。这本书是一个非常有价值的贡献,在令人印象深刻的数据基础上得出发人深省的结论。Gaurav和Ranganathan还广泛地写了历史“事故”、经济和政治结构和制度是如何影响棉花种植的,这使得这本书特别值得一读。作者对Vidarbha棉花种植者的热情使读者能够细致入微地了解农民的决策,他们的风险对冲和脆弱性,包括他们的希望和绝望。这有助于更深入地了解在气候危机的热点地区,雨养农业和地下水农业可能如何发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agrarian Change is a journal of agrarian political economy. It promotes investigation of the social relations and dynamics of production, property and power in agrarian formations and their processes of change, both historical and contemporary. It encourages work within a broad interdisciplinary framework, informed by theory, and serves as a forum for serious comparative analysis and scholarly debate. Contributions are welcomed from political economists, historians, anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, economists, geographers, lawyers, and others committed to the rigorous study and analysis of agrarian structure and change, past and present, in different parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Land Grab Double Binds: Peasant Farmers and/in the Ecuadorian Mining Boom Unpacking youth engagement in agriculture: Land, labour mobility and youth livelihoods in rural Nepal Making green cocoa: Deforestation, the legacy of war, and agrarian capitalism in Côte d'Ivoire Now we are in power: The politics of passive revolution in twenty-first-century Bolivia by Angus McNelly. University of Pittsburgh Press. 2023. Pp. 268. $60 (hb). ISBN 13: 978-08229-4778-3. ISBN 10: 0-8229-4778-1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2667634
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1