Efficient seismic fragility analysis considering uncertainties in structural systems and ground motions

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4254
Jungho Kim, Taeyong Kim
{"title":"Efficient seismic fragility analysis considering uncertainties in structural systems and ground motions","authors":"Jungho Kim,&nbsp;Taeyong Kim","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fragility plays a pivotal role in performance-based earthquake engineering, which represents the seismic performance of structural systems. To comprehensively understand the structural performance under seismic events, it is necessary to consider uncertainties in the structural model, i.e., epistemic uncertainties. However, considering such uncertainties is challenging due to computational complexity, leading most fragility analyses only to consider the chaotic behavior of ground motions on structural responses, i.e., aleatoric uncertainties. To address this challenge, this study proposes an adaptive algorithm that intertwines with the conventional fragility analysis procedures to consider both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. The algorithm introduces Gaussian process-based metamodels to efficiently consider epistemic uncertainties with a small number of time history analyses. Steel moment-resisting frame structures and a reinforced concrete building are used to demonstrate the improved efficiency and wide applicability of the proposed method. In each case, the proposed method yields fragility curves consistent with reference solutions but with substantially lower computational effort. Comprehensive discussions are provided regarding ground motion sets, structural types, and definitions of limit-states to demonstrate the robustness of the proposed approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 1","pages":"206-226"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4254","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fragility plays a pivotal role in performance-based earthquake engineering, which represents the seismic performance of structural systems. To comprehensively understand the structural performance under seismic events, it is necessary to consider uncertainties in the structural model, i.e., epistemic uncertainties. However, considering such uncertainties is challenging due to computational complexity, leading most fragility analyses only to consider the chaotic behavior of ground motions on structural responses, i.e., aleatoric uncertainties. To address this challenge, this study proposes an adaptive algorithm that intertwines with the conventional fragility analysis procedures to consider both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. The algorithm introduces Gaussian process-based metamodels to efficiently consider epistemic uncertainties with a small number of time history analyses. Steel moment-resisting frame structures and a reinforced concrete building are used to demonstrate the improved efficiency and wide applicability of the proposed method. In each case, the proposed method yields fragility curves consistent with reference solutions but with substantially lower computational effort. Comprehensive discussions are provided regarding ground motion sets, structural types, and definitions of limit-states to demonstrate the robustness of the proposed approach.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑结构体系和地震动不确定性的有效地震易损性分析
易损性在基于性能的地震工程中起着关键作用,它代表了结构体系的抗震性能。为了全面了解结构在地震作用下的性能,需要考虑结构模型中的不确定性,即认知不确定性。然而,由于计算的复杂性,考虑这些不确定性是具有挑战性的,导致大多数脆弱性分析只考虑地面运动对结构响应的混沌行为,即任意不确定性。为了应对这一挑战,本研究提出了一种自适应算法,该算法与传统的脆弱性分析程序交织在一起,以考虑任意和认知的不确定性。该算法引入基于高斯过程的元模型,通过少量的时间历史分析有效地考虑认知不确定性。以钢抗弯矩框架结构和钢筋混凝土建筑为例,验证了该方法的有效性和广泛适用性。在每种情况下,所提出的方法产生的脆弱性曲线与参考解一致,但计算量大大减少。对地震动集、结构类型和极限状态的定义进行了全面的讨论,以证明所提出方法的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of a New Separately-Anchored Self-Centering Beam-Column Connection Seismic Safety Evaluation of a Full-Size Reinforced Concrete Frame Infilled With Precast Modular Reinforced Blocks Using Pseudo-Dynamic Testing and Nonlinear Dynamic Finite Element Analysis Seismic Behavior of a Stone Curtain Wall System With Undercut Bolt Anchorage Under Various Loading Protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1