From community engagement to community inclusion for socially and procedurally just flood risk governance

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Flood Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1111/jfr3.13042
Sam Watkins, Alexandra Collins
{"title":"From community engagement to community inclusion for socially and procedurally just flood risk governance","authors":"Sam Watkins,&nbsp;Alexandra Collins","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.13042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban flood risk governance (FRG) approaches increasingly seek to engage local communities—and their surrounding ecosystem in natural flood management (NFM) approaches—to co-produce socio-ecological resilience. This systematic review investigates current approaches, barriers, and enablers of community engagement in urban FRG through a flood risk justice lens. Employing a systematic search and an adapted ‘best fit’ framework synthesis methodology, and reporting results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses transparent reporting system. The central theme of <i>inclusivity</i> emerged from the synthesis, which integrated sub-themes of relationality, non-universalism, power structures, and personal paradigms in a conceptual model. Results invite FRG practitioners to reframe community <i>engagement</i> as community <i>inclusion</i> in order to respond to the procedural, social, and environmental justice concerns of urban ‘flood disadvantage’ which may be reinforced by current <i>engagement</i> approaches. Critical discussion of evidence—informed by the conceptual model—recognised five principles for realising procedurally just community <i>inclusion</i>; promoting the co-production of integrated community inclusion strategies alongside the communities themselves. The study identified a gap in the literature concerning community involvement in NFM; highlighting a priority for future research with a view to realise more <i>inclusive</i> FRG.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.13042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.13042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban flood risk governance (FRG) approaches increasingly seek to engage local communities—and their surrounding ecosystem in natural flood management (NFM) approaches—to co-produce socio-ecological resilience. This systematic review investigates current approaches, barriers, and enablers of community engagement in urban FRG through a flood risk justice lens. Employing a systematic search and an adapted ‘best fit’ framework synthesis methodology, and reporting results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses transparent reporting system. The central theme of inclusivity emerged from the synthesis, which integrated sub-themes of relationality, non-universalism, power structures, and personal paradigms in a conceptual model. Results invite FRG practitioners to reframe community engagement as community inclusion in order to respond to the procedural, social, and environmental justice concerns of urban ‘flood disadvantage’ which may be reinforced by current engagement approaches. Critical discussion of evidence—informed by the conceptual model—recognised five principles for realising procedurally just community inclusion; promoting the co-production of integrated community inclusion strategies alongside the communities themselves. The study identified a gap in the literature concerning community involvement in NFM; highlighting a priority for future research with a view to realise more inclusive FRG.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从社区参与到社区包容,以实现社会和程序上公正的洪水风险治理
城市洪水风险治理(FRG)方法越来越多地寻求让当地社区及其周围生态系统参与自然洪水管理(NFM)方法,共同产生社会生态恢复力。本系统综述从洪水风险正义的角度调查了当前城市森林治理中社区参与的方法、障碍和推动因素。采用系统搜索和“最适合”框架综合方法,并根据系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目报告结果透明报告系统。包容性的中心主题从综合中出现,它将关系、非普遍主义、权力结构和个人范式等子主题整合在一个概念模型中。结果邀请FRG实践者将社区参与重新定义为社区包容,以回应城市“洪水劣势”的程序、社会和环境正义问题,这些问题可能会通过当前的参与方法得到加强。对证据的批判性讨论-由概念模型提供信息-认识到实现程序公正社区包容的五项原则;推动与社区共同制定综合社区包容战略。该研究发现了关于社区参与NFM的文献空白;强调未来研究的优先事项,以期实现更具包容性的FRG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
期刊最新文献
Toward Sustainable Flood Resilience: Assessing Efficacy of Paddy Field Dams to Reduce Floods in Jakarta Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle-Based Multispectral Imagery for River Soil Monitoring Putting the English Flooding of 2019–2021 in the Context of Antecedent Conditions Bridge Collapse in Mutsu, Aomori Prefecture, Japan in 2021 Attribution of Flood Forecasting Errors From a Multi-Model Perspective in Milan Urbanized River Basins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1