Unveiling socioeconomic disparities in maternal smoking during pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis of rural and Appalachian areas in Virginia utilizing the multi-dimensional YOST index.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-07032-7
Asal Pilehvari, Ashley Chipoletti, Rebecca Krukowski, Melissa Little
{"title":"Unveiling socioeconomic disparities in maternal smoking during pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis of rural and Appalachian areas in Virginia utilizing the multi-dimensional YOST index.","authors":"Asal Pilehvari, Ashley Chipoletti, Rebecca Krukowski, Melissa Little","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-07032-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal smoking during pregnancy carries significant health risks for both mothers and infants, especially in vulnerable regions like rural and Appalachian areas with high smoking rates. Understanding the causes of high smoking rates in vulnerable areas is crucial for designing effective interventions to promote smoking cessation and reduce preventable health disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Virginia Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS; years 2009-2020) comprised of 7,861 women aged over 18 were used in this cross-sectional observational study. Pregnant individuals were categorized as smoking if they reported smoking during the last trimester. A multi-level logistic regression was employed to examine the association of individual sociodemographic factors, rurality, Appalachian status, and county socioeconomic status (SES) proxied by Yost Index quintiles with smoking behaviors during pregnancy. The county of residence was considered as a random factor in the analysis. Trend analysis were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the overall sample, 92.8% (n = 7,292) were non-smokers, while 7.2% (n = 569) were smokers. The multi-level logistic regression analysis showed pregnant individuals aged 18-24 had 1.06 times higher odds of smoking compared to those over 35 (95% CI [1.02-1.10]). Those with a college education or higher had significantly reduced odds (OR: 0.10, 95% CI [0.10, 0.10]), as did racially minoritized individuals (OR: 0.59, 95% CI [0.51-0.68]) and Hispanic individuals (OR: 0.14, 95% CI [0.09-0.21]). Living in rural areas was associated with a 26% higher likelihood of smoking during pregnancy compared to urban areas (OR: 1.26, 95% CI [1.21-1.31]), while residing in Appalachian regions led to a 25% higher probability of smoking. Additionally, lower SES quintiles were linked to higher odds of smoking, with the lowest quintile at OR: 2.10 (95% CI [1.67-2.65]) and the second quintile at OR: 1.64 (95% CI [1.53-1.76]) as compared with the most affluent quintile. Trend analsysis shows smoking has declined across all quintiles, but a substantial gap persists between lowest and highest SES regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking rates during pregnancy have dropped overall but remain alarmingly high in specific rural and Appalachian areas. As smoking during pregnancy poses significant health risks, targeted interventions and resources for tobacco cessation programs are needed in these highly vulnerable regions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not Applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-07032-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal smoking during pregnancy carries significant health risks for both mothers and infants, especially in vulnerable regions like rural and Appalachian areas with high smoking rates. Understanding the causes of high smoking rates in vulnerable areas is crucial for designing effective interventions to promote smoking cessation and reduce preventable health disparities.

Methods: Data from the Virginia Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS; years 2009-2020) comprised of 7,861 women aged over 18 were used in this cross-sectional observational study. Pregnant individuals were categorized as smoking if they reported smoking during the last trimester. A multi-level logistic regression was employed to examine the association of individual sociodemographic factors, rurality, Appalachian status, and county socioeconomic status (SES) proxied by Yost Index quintiles with smoking behaviors during pregnancy. The county of residence was considered as a random factor in the analysis. Trend analysis were also conducted.

Results: Out of the overall sample, 92.8% (n = 7,292) were non-smokers, while 7.2% (n = 569) were smokers. The multi-level logistic regression analysis showed pregnant individuals aged 18-24 had 1.06 times higher odds of smoking compared to those over 35 (95% CI [1.02-1.10]). Those with a college education or higher had significantly reduced odds (OR: 0.10, 95% CI [0.10, 0.10]), as did racially minoritized individuals (OR: 0.59, 95% CI [0.51-0.68]) and Hispanic individuals (OR: 0.14, 95% CI [0.09-0.21]). Living in rural areas was associated with a 26% higher likelihood of smoking during pregnancy compared to urban areas (OR: 1.26, 95% CI [1.21-1.31]), while residing in Appalachian regions led to a 25% higher probability of smoking. Additionally, lower SES quintiles were linked to higher odds of smoking, with the lowest quintile at OR: 2.10 (95% CI [1.67-2.65]) and the second quintile at OR: 1.64 (95% CI [1.53-1.76]) as compared with the most affluent quintile. Trend analsysis shows smoking has declined across all quintiles, but a substantial gap persists between lowest and highest SES regions.

Conclusions: Smoking rates during pregnancy have dropped overall but remain alarmingly high in specific rural and Appalachian areas. As smoking during pregnancy poses significant health risks, targeted interventions and resources for tobacco cessation programs are needed in these highly vulnerable regions.

Trial registration: Not Applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示孕产妇在孕期吸烟的社会经济差异:利用多维 YOST 指数对弗吉尼亚州农村和阿巴拉契亚地区进行综合分析。
背景:孕妇在怀孕期间吸烟对母亲和婴儿都有重大的健康风险,特别是在吸烟率高的农村和阿巴拉契亚地区等脆弱地区。了解脆弱地区高吸烟率的原因对于设计有效的干预措施以促进戒烟和减少可预防的健康差距至关重要。方法:来自弗吉尼亚州妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)的数据;2009-2020年)包括7861名18岁以上的女性参与了这项横断面观察性研究。怀孕的人如果在最后三个月报告吸烟,就被归类为吸烟。采用多层级logistic回归分析以约斯特指数五分位数代表的个体社会人口统计学因素、农村状况、阿巴拉契亚状况和县社会经济状况(SES)与怀孕期间吸烟行为的关系。在分析中,居住地被认为是一个随机因素。并进行趋势分析。结果:在整个样本中,92.8% (n = 7292)为非吸烟者,7.2% (n = 569)为吸烟者。多层次logistic回归分析显示,18-24岁孕妇吸烟的几率是35岁以上孕妇的1.06倍(95% CI[1.02-1.10])。受过大学及以上教育的人患乳腺癌的几率显著降低(or: 0.10, 95% CI[0.10, 0.10]),少数族裔个体(or: 0.59, 95% CI[0.51-0.68])和西班牙裔个体(or: 0.14, 95% CI[0.09-0.21])也是如此。与城市地区相比,居住在农村地区的孕妇怀孕期间吸烟的可能性高出26% (OR: 1.26, 95% CI[1.21-1.31]),而居住在阿巴拉契亚地区的孕妇吸烟的可能性高出25%。此外,较低的经济地位五分位数与较高的吸烟几率有关,与最富裕的五分位数相比,最低的五分位数的OR为2.10 (95% CI[1.67-2.65]),第二个五分位数的OR为1.64 (95% CI[1.53-1.76])。趋势分析显示,所有五分位数的吸烟率都有所下降,但经济地位最低和最高的地区之间仍存在巨大差距。结论:怀孕期间的吸烟率总体上有所下降,但在某些农村和阿巴拉契亚地区,吸烟率仍然高得惊人。由于怀孕期间吸烟会带来重大健康风险,因此在这些高度脆弱的地区需要有针对性的干预措施和戒烟计划资源。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Development of the cyberchondria severity scale in pregnancy (CSS-P). ABOVE: cerclage after caesarean: protocol for a randomised controlled trial to assess the optimal preventative management for preterm birth secondary to caesarean section damage. Elective induction versus expectant management for suspected large-for-gestational-age fetuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Measuring emotion dysregulation in pregnancy using smartphone activity: a prospective research study in the United States. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of nurses and midwives on maternity triage in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study in two urban hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1