Stigma Toward Bipolar Disorder Among Psychiatry Residents: A Pilot Study Utilizing Narrative Medicine and a Video Vignette.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Academic Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1007/s40596-024-02106-2
Marsal Sanches, Brandi Karnes, Amanda Actor, Amanda Helminiak, Vineeth P John
{"title":"Stigma Toward Bipolar Disorder Among Psychiatry Residents: A Pilot Study Utilizing Narrative Medicine and a Video Vignette.","authors":"Marsal Sanches, Brandi Karnes, Amanda Actor, Amanda Helminiak, Vineeth P John","doi":"10.1007/s40596-024-02106-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stigma toward mental illness has been extensively described among health care professionals and has important implications with respect to quality of care. Narrative medicine has the potential to bring about positive impacts on the practitioner-patient relationship and on patient outcomes. The authors carried out a pilot study investigating the impact of narrative medicine on residents' stigma toward bipolar disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychiatry residents attended four narrative medicine workshops. During the encounters, the residents watched a video vignette displaying stigma-related experiences and life challenges faced by a standardized patient with bipolar disorder and were encouraged to discuss their personal reactions, opinions, and other reflections prompted by the video vignette, as well as to write reflective pieces on the content mobilized by the discussion. Stigma toward mental illnesses was measured through the Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes Scale-Version 4 (MICA v4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 psychiatry residents attended the four narrative medicine workshops. Overall, the activity was well received by the residents. There was a small, non-significant decline in the pre- and post-activity MICA v4 scores among residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing narrative medicine workshops for psychiatry residents and highlight the need for further studies with larger samples and a control group to evaluate its impact on stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-02106-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stigma toward mental illness has been extensively described among health care professionals and has important implications with respect to quality of care. Narrative medicine has the potential to bring about positive impacts on the practitioner-patient relationship and on patient outcomes. The authors carried out a pilot study investigating the impact of narrative medicine on residents' stigma toward bipolar disorder.

Methods: Psychiatry residents attended four narrative medicine workshops. During the encounters, the residents watched a video vignette displaying stigma-related experiences and life challenges faced by a standardized patient with bipolar disorder and were encouraged to discuss their personal reactions, opinions, and other reflections prompted by the video vignette, as well as to write reflective pieces on the content mobilized by the discussion. Stigma toward mental illnesses was measured through the Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes Scale-Version 4 (MICA v4).

Results: A total of 22 psychiatry residents attended the four narrative medicine workshops. Overall, the activity was well received by the residents. There was a small, non-significant decline in the pre- and post-activity MICA v4 scores among residents.

Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing narrative medicine workshops for psychiatry residents and highlight the need for further studies with larger samples and a control group to evaluate its impact on stigma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病学住院医师对躁郁症的成见:利用叙事医学和视频短片的试点研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy. The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.
期刊最新文献
Do "Calls to Action" Lead to Action? Comment on "Applying a Competency-Based Medical Education Framework to Development of Residents' Feedback Skills". Effects of Stigmatizing Language on Trainees' Clinical Decision-Making in Substance Use Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Online Cross-Cultural Dialogue: A Pilot for Transcultural Learning in Postgraduate Psychiatry Training. Challenges Arising from Disruptions in Psychiatry Training: Implications of Residents' Mass Resignation in South Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1